Pasib

Pasib — CS2 Stats

FI76561198204396544[U:1:244130816]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,275Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,454Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,458Purple band · top ~14.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94810 of 228546 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 30 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,458 -3,223 30 Jan19 Sept · 23 days played
16,66121,822peak 21,82230 Jan19 Sept
21,822Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-01-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,364 below peak (21,822)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,542 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,658), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate44.0%42.7%43.8%meets
Shot accuracy18.5%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.871.001.020.15 short
Match win rate44.9%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPasibFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,458 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning54
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44506Last 10044%Win rateWWWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility5.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning5.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time597ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 2–0 · dust2, 27 Feb
29%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 28 Mar
219msFastest reaction time · 0–3 · mirage, 27 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 27 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 38% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C25101540%-0.01
infernoC2491538%-0.03
mirageB1910953%-0.01
ancientC1871139%-0.02
anubisS86275%-0.02
nukeC52340%-0.02
cache1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

94,978Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
3,478Matches
44.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
44.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
18.5%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 4 players
8,618MVPs
2,345Hours (in match)
3,363Bombs planted
1,109Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,820
AWP5,862
SG 5532,764
AUG2,355
MP92,300

Lifetime map wins

7,038inferno
5,208dust2
2,403nuke
1,547train
958vertigo
357cbble
27lake
16ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

705Matches
50%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
91.0ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1155%1.2717.1
Inferno743%0.9915.6
Nuke560%2.0417.0
Anubis450%0.8314.0
Ancient367%1.2516.7
Overpass250%0.7712.0
Vertigo10%1.0021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
70.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
604msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
11.25HE damage / grenade
5.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.882% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8228% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–13-0.0310%18 Sept
ancient13–30.0520%18 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0212%18 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0822%5 Sept
anubis13–90.007%5 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0416%5 Sept
dust27–13-0.089%5 Sept
anubis13–60.0324%5 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0414%5 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0811%5 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0020%28 Aug
mirage13–70.0014%28 Aug
dust27–13-0.0121%28 Aug
dust211–130.0210%28 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0510%27 Aug
mirage0–3-0.0117%27 Aug
ancient13–80.0016%27 Aug
dust213–10.0215%27 Aug
anubis16–12-0.068%27 Aug
cache3–13-0.0618%27 Aug
nuke13–40.0118%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0322%26 Aug
mirage13–70.0120%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.016%26 Aug
anubis4–13-0.058%26 Aug
ancient13–10.0312%26 Aug
ancient2–130.0011%8 Aug
mirage13–110.0122%8 Aug
inferno13–80.0427%8 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0717%3 Aug
mirage5–130.019%31 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0113%30 Jul
mirage11–130.0414%30 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0015%30 Jul
dust213–11-0.0519%28 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0612%19 Jun
inferno2–130.0416%18 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0512%18 Jun
dust210–130.0014%18 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0220%27 May
inferno13–11-0.0813%27 May
inferno13–90.0113%12 May
dust210–13-0.0417%12 May
ancient13–50.0513%12 May
inferno10–13-0.1010%8 May
ancient8–13-0.0516%8 May
dust213–8-0.0024%8 May
ancient13–3-0.0814%8 May
dust211–13-0.0116%8 May
dust213–9-0.0322%24 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0517%24 Apr
inferno12–120.0116%24 Apr
dust213–60.076%23 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0415%21 Apr
dust28–130.0218%21 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0219%21 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0727%21 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0123%20 Apr
dust27–13-0.0216%20 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0513%20 Apr
dust210–13-0.0712%30 Mar
mirage7–13-0.089%30 Mar
dust21–13-0.0729%28 Mar
mirage6–13-0.1322%28 Mar
dust22–13-0.0816%28 Mar
mirage10–13-0.058%28 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0810%28 Mar
anubis5–130.0412%21 Mar
inferno12–12-0.047%21 Mar
dust213–100.0311%17 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0316%17 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0129%17 Mar
nuke12–120.0214%14 Mar
inferno13–70.0418%14 Mar
dust213–60.0315%14 Mar
dust214–16-0.0420%13 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0817%13 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0514%13 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0518%12 Mar
dust213–60.0321%8 Mar
mirage13–9-0.009%7 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0613%27 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0615%27 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0517%27 Feb
inferno6–13-0.088%27 Feb
dust26–13-0.0215%27 Feb
dust22–00.1514%27 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0610%19 Feb
dust25–13-0.0124%19 Feb
inferno13–60.0425%19 Feb
inferno13–70.0919%13 Feb
mirage13–60.0223%13 Feb
mirage13–80.0519%13 Feb
nuke8–8-0.076%13 Feb
ancient4–130.039%31 Jan
dust28–130.0222%31 Jan
inferno13–5-0.097%30 Jan
ancient13–80.0720%30 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0019%30 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0016%30 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →