Reginald McCumbiscuit

Reginald McCumbiscuit — CS2 Stats

SO76561198203860095[U:1:243594367]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

707Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
973Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,691Top 50% of 211,308 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#89711 of 258276 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,691 +2,508 18 Jul – 22 Oct · 29 days played
17,18319,840peak 19,84018 Jul22 Oct
19,840Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-07-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 149 below peak (19,840)
  • +1,339 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,162 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 309 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate48.4%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy14.7%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.361.031.05above
Match win rate50.5%45.2%45.7%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 7 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGReginald McCumbiscuitFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,691 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning46
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateTWWLLWTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · −46ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning4.6
Utility4.3
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time549ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 22 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · inferno, 22 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 21 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 31 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8cacheWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3113–1842%0.01
cacheC187–1139%0.02
dust2A159–660%0.04
infernoB115–645%0.08
ancientB115–645%0.04
anubisA85–363%0.04
nuke—21–150%0.08
office—10–10%0.05
overpass—10–10%0.06
debris—11–0100%0.16
poseidon—11–0100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

55,681Lifetime kills
1.36K/D · Top 10% of Level 6 players
2,371Matches
50.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
48.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
7,364MVPs
973Hours (in match)
1,721Bombs planted
698Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,206dust2
3,769inferno
805nuke
792vertigo
263train
220cbble
136office
62aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

140Matches
54%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
88.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3569%1.7618.7
Ancient1267%1.4818.8
Dust21080%1.3416.8
Nuke540%1.1517.2
Inferno450%0.9412.8
Cache40%1.0215.5
Anubis367%2.0116.7
Vertigo250%1.1015.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
541msReaction time
44.2%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
7.16HE damage / grenade
17.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4094 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.9818% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0413%22 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0017%22 Oct →
inferno13–20.0115%22 Oct →
office7–130.0532%21 Oct →
overpass8–130.0613%21 Oct →
mirage13–100.0326%21 Oct →
cache15–150.0116%14 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0122%10 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0118%10 Oct →
cache13–60.0513%10 Oct →
anubis13–50.0825%7 Oct →
inferno6–130.0622%7 Oct →
cache10–130.0515%29 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0121%29 Sept →
mirage12–160.0313%23 Sept →
anubis6–130.0119%22 Sept →
inferno9–20.2818%22 Sept →
debris9–70.1611%22 Sept →
poseidon9–20.1325%22 Sept →
nuke9–40.1021%22 Sept →
inferno9–10.2435%22 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0516%21 Sept →
mirage7–130.0418%16 Sept →
mirage13–30.0010%9 Sept →
ancient12–160.0317%9 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0115%6 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.0322%4 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0413%4 Sept →
inferno13–60.0419%25 Aug →
cache3–130.0319%18 Aug →
dust216–140.0311%18 Aug →
mirage13–50.0827%18 Aug →
cache13–70.0724%18 Aug →
ancient6–130.0920%16 Aug →
anubis13–100.1323%16 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0017%15 Aug →
inferno13–160.1423%15 Aug →
dust213–30.0814%12 Aug →
dust211–130.0418%11 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0222%10 Aug →
inferno6–130.0215%10 Aug →
ancient13–90.1321%10 Aug →
anubis9–130.0511%6 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0221%6 Aug →
inferno12–160.0525%5 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0520%4 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0513%4 Aug →
dust213–40.1430%4 Aug →
mirage11–130.0010%4 Aug →
mirage10–130.0031%4 Aug →
mirage6–130.0825%4 Aug →
cache16–120.0116%4 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0118%4 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0121%4 Aug →
mirage6–130.0326%4 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0118%31 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0127%31 Jul →
cache13–110.1122%31 Jul →
ancient13–10.1020%31 Jul →
mirage13–160.0218%31 Jul →
ancient13–20.0621%31 Jul →
cache4–130.0226%31 Jul →
ancient10–130.0321%28 Jul →
cache3–130.0718%28 Jul →
dust213–60.1120%28 Jul →
dust213–60.0818%28 Jul →
mirage13–110.0219%28 Jul →
mirage13–30.0127%28 Jul →
mirage16–120.0316%25 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.048%25 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.0215%23 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0033%23 Jul →
mirage13–50.0319%22 Jul →
dust29–130.0117%22 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0113%22 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0717%22 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0615%22 Jul →
cache13–100.0722%20 Jul →
anubis13–100.1028%20 Jul →
mirage2–130.0124%20 Jul →
mirage13–40.0324%19 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0110%19 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0026%18 Jul →
mirage13–70.0219%18 Jul →
cache13–4-0.0523%18 Jul →
dust213–50.0818%13 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0520%13 Jul →
inferno13–90.0618%13 Jul →
cache10–130.0329%13 Jul →
ancient13–60.0515%13 Jul →
mirage11–130.0725%13 Jul →
cache0–13-0.040%12 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0318%12 Jul →
cache13–70.0914%12 Jul →
ancient13–90.0021%10 Jul →
mirage11–130.0617%10 Jul →
mirage13–50.0413%10 Jul →
nuke11–130.0714%10 Jul →
inferno9–130.0214%10 Jul →
dust211–130.0415%10 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.