infopeek leajo

infopeek leajo — CS2 Stats

YE76561198202144319[U:1:241878591]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,371Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,840Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,829 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,371 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 28 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,829 +0 3 Sept16 Sept · 4 observations
1,8291,829peak 1,8293 Sept16 Sept
1,829Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-04-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,829
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 172 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches53+2
Win rate60%67%−7pp
K/D0.931.01−0.08
Headshot %61%59%+1pp

Measured 11 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.1%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy17.2%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.821.061.070.25 short
Match win rate49.0%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGinfopeek leajoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,829 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,829csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning42
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateWWLLLWWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +5.6pp headshot accuracy · +88ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.7
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.2
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time569ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 15 Jul
39%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · vertigo, 25 Jun
344msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · ancient, 13 Aug
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 13 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 65% over 17dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB189950%-0.01
ancientS1711665%-0.01
anubisA148657%-0.02
mirageB147750%-0.01
nukeA127558%-0.02
dust2D113827%-0.03
infernoC83538%-0.01
vertigo21150%-0.04
overpass220100%0.03
italy1010%-0.04
warden1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

109,342Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
4,225Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
52.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
17.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
10,207MVPs
2,393Hours (in match)
3,914Bombs planted
893Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,956inferno
4,834nuke
3,474vertigo
2,874dust2
1,085train
85office
45cbble
29italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,038Matches
51%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
72.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19554%0.9114.2
Ancient18949%0.9615.2
Nuke11255%0.9915.1
Anubis10043%0.8514.5
Dust29236%0.8814.6
Vertigo4959%1.0415.6
Cache2245%0.9013.6
Inferno1464%0.8312.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.5%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
560msReaction time
18.8%T opening success
52.9%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
11.7%Flash assists
9.79HE damage / grenade
13.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.488 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.8461% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0234%15 Sept
nuke13–40.0521%15 Sept
italy6–13-0.0430%15 Sept
dust21–13-0.0533%15 Sept
anubis22–25-0.0118%4 Sept
vertigo13–11-0.0031%4 Sept
nuke13–70.0329%4 Sept
overpass13–80.0224%2 Sept
anubis12–120.0337%28 Aug
cache12–2-0.0017%28 Aug
cache9–13-0.0825%28 Aug
dust211–13-0.0327%23 Aug
cache3–13-0.0336%21 Aug
nuke19–150.0221%19 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0224%19 Aug
dust213–4-0.0121%19 Aug
ancient13–2-0.018%13 Aug
anubis13–10.0413%13 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0710%12 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0132%11 Aug
ancient13–60.0630%11 Aug
mirage17–190.0336%9 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0324%7 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0325%6 Aug
cache13–50.0326%6 Aug
cache13–60.0218%6 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0329%5 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0325%5 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0123%24 Jul
cache13–40.0125%24 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0031%24 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0522%24 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0314%22 Jul
dust24–13-0.0230%21 Jul
ancient13–40.0424%21 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0414%21 Jul
cache5–13-0.0415%19 Jul
cache5–13-0.0230%15 Jul
nuke13–40.0621%15 Jul
cache13–60.0424%15 Jul
anubis22–20-0.0525%11 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0519%11 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0715%10 Jul
mirage6–130.0235%10 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0331%10 Jul
inferno13–40.0335%10 Jul
dust21–8-0.0618%10 Jul
cache8–0-0.0030%10 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0724%30 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0225%28 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0616%26 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0322%26 Jun
dust210–13-0.0518%25 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0723%25 Jun
vertigo8–8-0.0739%25 Jun
inferno4–90.0229%25 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0923%25 Jun
cache4–13-0.0828%25 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0323%25 Jun
ancient5–130.0127%19 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0216%17 Jun
mirage16–130.0126%16 Jun
ancient16–130.0520%15 Jun
inferno0–40.0417%14 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0729%14 Jun
dust213–6-0.0116%14 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0333%14 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0329%14 Jun
anubis19–16-0.0424%5 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0318%4 Jun
ancient12–160.0124%29 May
mirage9–130.0128%29 May
anubis16–14-0.0233%28 May
ancient6–13-0.0715%28 May
anubis13–8-0.0020%27 May
dust211–13-0.0338%18 May
nuke3–13-0.1213%16 May
mirage11–130.0622%15 May
overpass13–100.0523%15 May
cache3–13-0.0224%15 May
dust213–10.0638%15 May
cache0–3-0.070%14 May
ancient13–11-0.0524%14 May
inferno13–30.0126%8 May
cache13–50.0216%8 May
nuke13–70.0521%8 May
mirage13–10-0.0116%7 May
warden9–13-0.0324%7 May
cache8–130.0119%7 May
cache13–60.0129%7 May
mirage13–4-0.0121%5 May
mirage3–13-0.0222%5 May
inferno11–13-0.0125%29 Apr
cache13–80.0518%29 Apr
dust22–13-0.0716%29 Apr
ancient12–12-0.0635%29 Apr
cache2–130.0028%29 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0020%28 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0128%28 Apr
dust27–13-0.0414%28 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →