sqad

sqad — CS2 Stats

CX76561198198741726[U:1:238475998]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

634Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
564Hours in CS36Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating10,534Blue band · top ~52.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+741Premier CS Rating · 9,793 → 10,534

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,534 +326 31 Aug – 16 Oct · 10 days played
9,79310,534peak 10,53431 Aug16 Oct
10,534Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 10,534
  • +519 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,466 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate62.2%43.7%44.8%above
Shot accuracy0.3%12.0%12.4%12.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.021.03above
Match win rate49.0%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsqadFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER10,534 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning45
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–49–6Last 10045%Win rateWWWLLWLTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch1.2

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time605ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 16 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · inferno, 14 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 0–7 · nuke, 16 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB209–1145%-0.02
infernoC166–1038%-0.01
cacheB157–847%-0.03
mirageA149–564%-0.00
nukeC114–736%-0.02
ancientA106–460%-0.02
dust2D103–730%-0.02
rush_001—30–30%-0.04
vertigo—11–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

18,573Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
873Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
62.2%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players
0.3%Shot accuracy
1,179MVPs
847Hours (in match)
760Bombs planted
209Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

958dust2
827nuke
775inferno
28office
27vertigo
24bank
9lake
3ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

155Matches
51%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
64.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3450%1.0113.5
Anubis3441%0.7110.7
Ancient3355%0.9012.8
Cache2756%0.9112.8
Dust21369%0.8714.8
Nuke838%1.1015.4
Inferno540%0.658.6
Vertigo1100%0.738.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
88.6%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
580msReaction time
41.8%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
7.58HE damage / grenade
6.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.048%16 Oct →
inferno13–70.1127%16 Oct →
cache13–30.0811%16 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.1010%16 Oct →
nuke4–130.0239%16 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0116%16 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0610%15 Oct →
ancient12–120.0414%14 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0513%14 Oct →
mirage13–90.0120%13 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0229%13 Oct →
mirage13–60.0425%11 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0314%11 Oct →
ancient12–12-0.038%11 Oct →
anubis13–100.0111%11 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0114%11 Oct →
nuke13–60.0022%11 Oct →
mirage6–0-0.0222%11 Oct →
ancient13–60.0319%11 Oct →
ancient13–80.0222%8 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.057%3 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0813%3 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0410%2 Oct →
anubis11–130.0027%2 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0620%2 Oct →
rush_0014–80.0117%1 Oct →
inferno5–30.0525%30 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0411%30 Sept →
rush_0017–8-0.0416%30 Sept →
rush_0015–8-0.0925%30 Sept →
mirage13–60.078%28 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0317%28 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0431%28 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0420%28 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0520%28 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0310%28 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.110%28 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0614%27 Sept →
cache0–13-0.114%27 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.076%27 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.045%26 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0516%26 Sept →
anubis6–130.0314%25 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.039%24 Sept →
dust23–13-0.079%24 Sept →
anubis13–100.0920%24 Sept →
inferno4–10-0.0116%24 Sept →
dust213–70.0721%23 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0529%23 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.086%23 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.059%22 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0617%22 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0215%22 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0712%22 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.104%22 Sept →
mirage19–16-0.0317%22 Sept →
anubis10–130.1019%20 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0224%20 Sept →
inferno13–70.0216%20 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0712%20 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0714%20 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0515%18 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0312%17 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0121%17 Sept →
nuke13–90.0631%17 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0428%17 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0526%17 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0817%17 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0236%16 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0215%16 Sept →
inferno13–70.0618%16 Sept →
anubis13–90.0135%16 Sept →
nuke0–7-0.0133%16 Sept →
inferno0–4-0.08100%14 Sept →
mirage6–1-0.050%14 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.1317%14 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0411%14 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0431%13 Sept →
mirage13–110.0420%13 Sept →
nuke13–90.0324%13 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0117%11 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0225%10 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0326%10 Sept →
nuke1–11-0.0810%10 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0117%9 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0118%9 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0514%8 Sept →
mirage12–120.0324%8 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.069%8 Sept →
mirage13–60.0816%7 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0113%7 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0512%7 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0116%7 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.113%7 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0017%7 Sept →
anubis10–130.0110%6 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0013%6 Sept →
mirage13–00.1017%6 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0417%6 Sept →
ancient13–70.0420%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.