♕-=w0T4n=-♕

♕-=w0T4n=-♕ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198198383230[U:1:238117502]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,149Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,225Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,092Purple band · top ~24.1% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,092 -156 1 Sept – 31 Oct · 50 days played
15,73118,486peak 18,4861 Sept31 Oct
18,486Peak Premier in tracked matches
51Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,394 below peak (18,486)
  • -585 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,908 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate40.4%44.4%46.9%6.6% short
Shot accuracy7.7%11.9%13.0%5.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.031.080.17 short
Match win rate47.9%45.2%46.7%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG♕-=w0T4n=-♕PREMIER16,092 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning69
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateLWLTLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility5.7
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.3

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning6.9
Utility5.7
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels8.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time587ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 1 Oct →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 30 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 5 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 36% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC259–1636%-0.01
infernoB2311–1248%0.01
cacheS2013–765%0.02
mirageB115–645%-0.02
dust2S108–280%0.02
ancientC73–443%0.01
nuke—42–250%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,410Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
5,511Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Purple band
40.4%Headshot %
7.7%Shot accuracy
11,599MVPs
2,572Hours (in match)
6,580Bombs planted
1,197Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,850
AWP8,948
MP75,861
P905,053
Tec-93,108

Lifetime map wins

27,250inferno
4,883dust2
4,407nuke
2,310office
2,119vertigo
708train
242cbble
81lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
65.2%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
596msReaction time
63.3%T opening success
60.3%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
9.76HE damage / grenade
12.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4516 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–16-0.029%31 Oct →
cache13–70.1212%30 Oct →
mirage6–130.0114%29 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.036%29 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0518%27 Oct →
inferno8–130.0120%25 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0515%25 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0310%23 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0313%23 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0313%22 Oct →
inferno13–60.0215%21 Oct →
cache5–130.0420%20 Oct →
inferno13–50.0719%20 Oct →
dust213–110.0011%19 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0216%19 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0217%17 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.087%15 Oct →
dust213–60.0231%14 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0413%14 Oct →
cache13–60.0012%13 Oct →
anubis13–60.1016%13 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0622%13 Oct →
dust28–130.1031%12 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0421%12 Oct →
inferno13–20.1027%11 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0110%10 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0010%9 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0212%9 Oct →
cache6–130.0013%8 Oct →
anubis13–50.1119%7 Oct →
inferno13–60.0726%7 Oct →
anubis13–100.0418%5 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0412%5 Oct →
cache13–70.0825%2 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0610%1 Oct →
nuke13–110.1420%1 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0412%1 Oct →
dust213–100.0732%30 Sept →
cache16–130.1319%28 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0413%27 Sept →
dust211–130.0219%27 Sept →
inferno13–110.0812%27 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0631%27 Sept →
inferno13–90.0917%27 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0731%26 Sept →
inferno9–130.0113%26 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0818%26 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0413%25 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0424%25 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0113%25 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0118%25 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.028%24 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.1013%24 Sept →
dust213–90.1021%24 Sept →
cache6–130.0113%23 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0410%22 Sept →
anubis13–90.0415%22 Sept →
cache13–90.0120%22 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0116%22 Sept →
cache10–130.0210%21 Sept →
inferno13–100.0524%21 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0920%21 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0314%20 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0214%20 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0313%20 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0319%19 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0618%19 Sept →
cache13–30.0524%19 Sept →
anubis15–150.0318%18 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0320%17 Sept →
nuke13–60.0015%17 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.1010%16 Sept →
cache13–80.0520%16 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0216%15 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0520%15 Sept →
ancient10–130.0217%14 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0014%13 Sept →
cache13–80.0131%12 Sept →
ancient13–80.0222%12 Sept →
mirage16–130.0121%12 Sept →
ancient13–20.0417%11 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0311%11 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0713%10 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0120%9 Sept →
anubis7–130.0217%8 Sept →
inferno13–40.1114%8 Sept →
cache13–20.0831%8 Sept →
cache13–90.0219%7 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0019%7 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0117%6 Sept →
cache13–1-0.0112%6 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0022%5 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0115%3 Sept →
ancient13–70.0821%3 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0419%3 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0213%2 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0120%2 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0214%1 Sept →
anubis16–140.0526%1 Sept →
anubis13–90.0615%1 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.