GiveawaySign In
๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ‘ Osama Bin Happy โ„

๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ‘ Osama Bin Happy โ„ โ€” CS2 Stats

CX76561198196713605[U:1:236447877]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

2,223Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,726Purple band ยท top ~25.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#138270 of 257496 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 ยท 1,401 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,726 -3,182 14 Jun โ€“ 16 Oct ยท 27 days played
15,72620,599peak 20,59914 Jun16 Oct
21,091Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,401Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-06-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak โ€” 1,401
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 โ€” 130 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 ยท Level 6 ยท Level 5 ยท Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,873 below peak (20,599)
  • -4,274 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 โ€” 4,274 to go
  • Reached: Pink band ยท Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDBโ€™s own observation โ€” no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ‘ Osama Bin Happy โ„FACEITLevel 7 ยท 1,401 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,726 ยท Purple bandPEAK ELO1,401csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning53
Utility24

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45โ€“50โ€“5Last 10045%Win rateLLWWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’10pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.02 avg rating ยท +1.6pp headshot accuracy ยท +23ms reaction

Win rate โˆ’10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” within the normal variation of a 10-match window (ยฑ20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2โ€“3 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Last 10

  • 3โ€“7 ยท 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 7โ€“13 ยท 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility2.4
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 โ€” the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points โ€” deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.3
Utility2.4
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00โˆ’0.01
first โ…“ avg 0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.00
Reaction time546msโˆ’13ms
first โ…“ avg 559ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy32.8%โˆ’1.1%
first โ…“ avg 33.9% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 32.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating ยท 8โ€“13 ยท cache, 2 Sept โ†’
59%Best headshot accuracy ยท 7โ€“13 ยท dust2, 11 Oct โ†’
391msFastest reaction time ยท 13โ€“11 ยท mirage, 4 Oct โ†’
13โ€“3Biggest win ยท cache, 15 Jul โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8โ€“8In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map ยท 54% over 24nukeWeakest map ยท 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2413โ€“1154%0.02
infernoC188โ€“1044%0.01
cacheB147โ€“750%0.01
ancientC135โ€“838%-0.00
anubisB115โ€“645%0.01
nukeD103โ€“730%-0.00
dust2C94โ€“544%0.02
vertigoโ€”10โ€“10%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

695Matches
52%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
82.1ADR
64%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9258%1.1716.9
Inferno5448%1.2517.8
Anubis5157%1.1616.4
Ancient3441%1.1717.5
Cache2330%1.0316.3
Nuke2255%1.1918.7
Vertigo1331%1.0615.5
Overpass714%0.8615.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

32.6%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.4%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
8.5ยฐPreaim
549msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
40.4%CT opening success
0.28Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
8.89HE damage / grenade
0.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2791 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9927% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy โ†’Nuke grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16โ€“190.0434%18 Oct โ†’
nuke9โ€“13-0.0628%18 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0420%16 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0356%14 Oct โ†’
nuke2โ€“13-0.0918%14 Oct โ†’
cache6โ€“13-0.0426%12 Oct โ†’
dust27โ€“13-0.0059%11 Oct โ†’
inferno4โ€“90.0225%6 Oct โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.0131%5 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0031%4 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“80.0123%2 Oct โ†’
cache5โ€“13-0.0348%1 Oct โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0333%1 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“40.0733%20 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“8-0.0330%19 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“11-0.0322%18 Sept โ†’
anubis7โ€“13-0.0224%18 Sept โ†’
vertigo10โ€“130.0524%4 Sept โ†’
dust26โ€“130.0630%4 Sept โ†’
mirage4โ€“130.0142%4 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“40.0349%4 Sept โ†’
inferno14โ€“160.0430%2 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“13-0.0023%2 Sept โ†’
cache8โ€“130.1243%2 Sept โ†’
cache6โ€“13-0.0329%2 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“50.0540%31 Aug โ†’
inferno6โ€“13-0.0436%31 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0027%31 Aug โ†’
ancient10โ€“13-0.0528%27 Aug โ†’
cache14โ€“16-0.0637%25 Aug โ†’
mirage8โ€“130.0631%23 Aug โ†’
ancient3โ€“13-0.0739%22 Aug โ†’
cache4โ€“130.0332%10 Aug โ†’
cache9โ€“13-0.0623%5 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“40.1126%5 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“40.0836%5 Aug โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0241%4 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“110.0428%4 Aug โ†’
ancient11โ€“13-0.0217%3 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0438%3 Aug โ†’
inferno10โ€“130.0337%2 Aug โ†’
ancient6โ€“13-0.0324%2 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“60.0128%2 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“50.1031%2 Aug โ†’
nuke15โ€“15-0.0240%2 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0636%26 Jul โ†’
dust214โ€“160.0126%26 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“90.0643%26 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0326%26 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0436%26 Jul โ†’
ancient1โ€“13-0.0936%25 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“100.0136%25 Jul โ†’
dust216โ€“14-0.0135%24 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0633%23 Jul โ†’
nuke15โ€“150.0139%23 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“16-0.0420%21 Jul โ†’
dust27โ€“13-0.0022%21 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“40.0026%21 Jul โ†’
mirage3โ€“130.0226%20 Jul โ†’
mirage2โ€“13-0.0329%15 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.0828%15 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“30.1046%15 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“60.0638%15 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“8-0.0224%15 Jul โ†’
anubis11โ€“130.0240%13 Jul โ†’
ancient7โ€“13-0.0133%13 Jul โ†’
mirage9โ€“130.0835%13 Jul โ†’
inferno9โ€“13-0.0740%13 Jul โ†’
inferno16โ€“130.0336%11 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.0332%10 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0428%10 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“8-0.0346%10 Jul โ†’
mirage2โ€“13-0.0827%10 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“40.0242%10 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“5-0.0029%10 Jul โ†’
ancient8โ€“130.0433%9 Jul โ†’
inferno8โ€“13-0.0035%9 Jul โ†’
mirage16โ€“140.0016%9 Jul โ†’
mirage9โ€“130.0234%9 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“110.0541%9 Jul โ†’
mirage16โ€“13-0.0622%7 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0238%7 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“5-0.0333%7 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.0332%7 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0337%7 Jul โ†’
anubis15โ€“150.0229%6 Jul โ†’
nuke15โ€“150.0127%6 Jul โ†’
inferno11โ€“130.0039%6 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“100.0138%2 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“160.0122%1 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“110.0142%28 Jun โ†’
nuke7โ€“130.0628%28 Jun โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.0345%24 Jun โ†’
anubis10โ€“13-0.0049%16 Jun โ†’
inferno8โ€“130.0148%15 Jun โ†’
dust213โ€“80.0329%15 Jun โ†’
nuke15โ€“150.0429%14 Jun โ†’
inferno13โ€“10-0.0325%14 Jun โ†’
mirage10โ€“130.0932%14 Jun โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0734%11 Jun โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.

Explore CSDB.gg

Related

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other gameseDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPIcm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turnResolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutionsCrosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

CS2 Skin WordleName the skin from an extreme close-upModel AccuracyPrediction model accuracy statsTeam Head-to-HeadCompare pro team stats

Learn & Explore

CS2 vs Rainbow Six SiegeDestructibility and operators vs pure utilityCS2 Player Roles ExplainedEntry, support, AWPer, lurker, IGLCS2 Fixes & TroubleshootingStep-by-step fixes for every common CS2 problem