lurifax

lurifax — CS2 Stats

SZ76561198194891907[U:1:234626179]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

717Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,034Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,553Top 50% of 210,367 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#74979 of 257496 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,494 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,553 -2,401 7 Aug – 24 Oct · 25 days played
19,64823,226peak 23,2267 Aug24 Oct
23,955Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,494Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-08-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,494
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 37 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,673 below peak (23,226)
  • -2,401 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,447 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,512), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate56.4%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy15.8%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.061.070.11 short
Match win rate44.5%46.3%46.9%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlurifaxFACEITLevel 8 · 1,494 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,553 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,494csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning73
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateLLWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +68ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.5
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels6.8
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning7.3
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels7.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time576ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy27.3%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 28.4% → last ⅓ avg 27.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 17 Oct →
51%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 23 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 12 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 16 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 77% over 13anubisWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2512–1348%0.02
infernoB199–1047%0.01
ancientB136–746%0.02
dust2S1310–377%0.03
anubisD133–1023%0.02
nukeA95–456%0.01
cacheS86–275%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,703Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
3,462Matches
44.5%Match win rate
56.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
8,330MVPs
2,034Hours (in match)
2,709Bombs planted
801Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,560
AWP10,116
SSG 081,552
P901,393
P2501,350
Knife1,157

Lifetime map wins

4,713dust2
3,283inferno
1,328nuke
256cbble
172vertigo
117train
68office
46lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

399Matches
56%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
76.3ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10458%1.1616.1
Inferno4556%1.1215.5
Dust22945%0.9715.0
Anubis2741%1.1617.5
Cache2370%1.2317.8
Ancient1942%1.0616.1
Nuke1747%1.0613.9
Overpass580%0.9113.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
84.9%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
579msReaction time
59.2%T opening success
64.0%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
8.87HE damage / grenade
8.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0224%24 Oct →
ancient7–130.0017%24 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0142%24 Oct →
mirage16–140.0433%24 Oct →
dust213–80.0931%24 Oct →
cache16–140.0020%24 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0119%24 Oct →
mirage13–160.0522%24 Oct →
mirage9–130.0021%23 Oct →
dust213–80.1051%23 Oct →
dust213–60.0835%23 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0319%23 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0128%22 Oct →
dust213–20.0446%22 Oct →
mirage11–130.0426%21 Oct →
anubis8–130.0424%20 Oct →
mirage13–30.0115%20 Oct →
mirage8–130.0026%19 Oct →
ancient13–80.0733%18 Oct →
anubis11–130.0221%18 Oct →
inferno16–190.0126%18 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0219%17 Oct →
inferno6–130.0222%17 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0424%17 Oct →
ancient13–10.2428%17 Oct →
cache15–150.0729%16 Oct →
nuke13–20.0836%16 Oct →
dust213–40.0022%16 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0129%16 Oct →
anubis16–130.0120%16 Oct →
dust211–130.0325%16 Oct →
mirage13–100.1042%16 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0229%16 Oct →
inferno13–90.0220%11 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0019%11 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0131%11 Oct →
mirage13–70.0442%11 Oct →
inferno13–60.0535%11 Oct →
dust27–130.0841%11 Oct →
mirage11–130.0238%11 Oct →
ancient9–130.0832%11 Oct →
mirage20–220.0126%9 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.1322%9 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.1026%8 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0321%7 Oct →
cache19–17-0.0324%6 Oct →
mirage13–110.0522%4 Oct →
anubis13–110.0320%4 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0419%3 Oct →
cache13–80.0633%2 Oct →
dust213–11-0.1119%2 Oct →
anubis13–10.1533%29 Sept →
anubis13–160.0133%27 Sept →
ancient3–130.0126%27 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0222%26 Sept →
inferno13–100.0526%23 Sept →
nuke13–80.0538%7 Sept →
cache13–50.0833%7 Sept →
anubis10–130.0736%7 Sept →
inferno13–80.0331%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0435%4 Sept →
inferno14–160.0329%2 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0515%31 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0235%29 Aug →
nuke11–130.0428%27 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0333%25 Aug →
mirage8–130.0035%23 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0627%22 Aug →
mirage13–100.0332%22 Aug →
cache11–130.0227%22 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0024%20 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0435%20 Aug →
cache13–50.0627%20 Aug →
dust26–130.0038%20 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0028%19 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0324%19 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.058%19 Aug →
mirage15–150.0628%19 Aug →
ancient13–80.0336%19 Aug →
inferno13–110.0430%18 Aug →
anubis11–130.0429%17 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0241%17 Aug →
mirage13–40.1528%17 Aug →
mirage13–30.0335%16 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0337%16 Aug →
nuke13–00.0229%16 Aug →
mirage6–130.0138%16 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0031%16 Aug →
inferno13–30.0437%16 Aug →
dust213–100.0636%16 Aug →
cache13–80.1531%16 Aug →
mirage13–100.0026%16 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0421%13 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0613%12 Aug →
nuke13–60.0032%12 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0129%11 Aug →
inferno13–60.0623%11 Aug →
mirage12–160.0428%9 Aug →
mirage15–150.0720%9 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0111%7 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.