Leif835

Leif835 — CS2 Stats

76561198073103660[U:1:112837932]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

428Tracked matches39%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#52626 of 257505 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,250 -739 13 May – 25 Sept · 27 days played
21,74823,433peak 23,43313 May25 Sept
23,698Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-05-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLeif835FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning50
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateLLWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.0
Utility4.1
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time515ms−92ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 28 Jun →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 19 Jul →
352msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 16 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 15anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2412–1250%0.01
infernoB2110–1148%-0.00
mirageC187–1139%0.00
ancientS1511–473%0.01
anubisD93–633%-0.00
cacheA74–357%0.00
dust2—41–325%-0.01
overpass—22–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

85Matches
56%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
84.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
5%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1164%1.0114.1
Nuke978%1.7121.3
Anubis838%1.6419.1
Inferno743%1.0615.4
Ancient333%1.2321.3
Overpass20%0.9021.5
Cache250%1.4515.5
Vertigo1100%2.7119.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
66.9%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
514msReaction time
23.4%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
9.65HE damage / grenade
5.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3941 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.3758% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0319%24 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0520%8 Oct →
anubis13–10.0614%29 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0319%25 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0023%12 Sept →
inferno13–100.0134%29 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0121%20 Aug →
mirage13–30.0029%16 Aug →
ancient13–110.0126%16 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0419%16 Aug →
inferno13–30.0332%16 Aug →
nuke10–130.0120%15 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0022%14 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0124%14 Aug →
inferno11–130.0625%13 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0620%12 Aug →
nuke13–60.0113%12 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0024%11 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0123%11 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0019%9 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0416%9 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0625%7 Aug →
anubis4–130.0422%7 Aug →
ancient13–90.0517%7 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0216%7 Aug →
nuke13–110.0217%7 Aug →
anubis9–130.0417%7 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0120%5 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.055%5 Aug →
inferno15–150.029%5 Aug →
ancient13–110.0610%5 Aug →
inferno11–130.0518%30 Jul →
cache13–70.0321%30 Jul →
mirage13–110.0816%27 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0617%27 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0119%24 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0221%24 Jul →
nuke14–160.0115%22 Jul →
cache13–110.0215%22 Jul →
anubis16–12-0.0317%22 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0320%22 Jul →
ancient13–100.0120%22 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.066%22 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0115%20 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0115%20 Jul →
ancient13–100.0420%20 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0734%19 Jul →
inferno13–80.0213%19 Jul →
cache13–80.0434%19 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0118%16 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0312%16 Jul →
nuke13–100.0015%2 Jul →
mirage13–100.1527%28 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0212%28 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0411%27 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0210%27 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0019%27 Jun →
inferno16–140.0128%16 Jun →
overpass13–7-0.0424%6 Jun →
ancient13–40.0824%6 Jun →
mirage8–130.0415%4 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0721%2 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0417%2 Jun →
inferno13–70.0517%2 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0218%2 Jun →
anubis6–130.0229%1 Jun →
mirage13–16-0.0217%1 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.0911%1 Jun →
nuke9–130.0020%28 May →
nuke8–13-0.0114%25 May →
ancient13–7-0.0121%25 May →
mirage13–80.0316%25 May →
cache10–13-0.0220%25 May →
mirage6–130.0020%24 May →
inferno13–70.0212%24 May →
overpass13–70.039%24 May →
nuke9–130.0412%24 May →
nuke13–80.1019%21 May →
nuke13–40.0121%20 May →
ancient7–13-0.0323%20 May →
dust22–13-0.0223%20 May →
mirage16–13-0.0321%20 May →
nuke13–20.0422%19 May →
nuke3–13-0.0914%19 May →
nuke13–80.0811%19 May →
nuke8–130.0013%16 May →
ancient13–90.0420%16 May →
mirage13–80.0333%16 May →
nuke12–12-0.0511%15 May →
mirage9–13-0.0817%15 May →
nuke7–30.0511%14 May →
nuke13–10.1117%14 May →
nuke13–20.055%13 May →
anubis10–130.0110%13 May →
ancient5–13-0.0610%13 May →
inferno11–130.0014%13 May →
mirage13–40.0320%13 May →
anubis13–2-0.0625%13 May →
ancient13–90.0216%13 May →
cache13–8-0.0116%13 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.