Poopburger Goyslopoff

Poopburger Goyslopoff — CS2 Stats

UA76561198193629438[U:1:233363710]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

824Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
9,015Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,670Top 5% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2972 of 224147 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,870 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 27,670 → 27,670
0Faceit ELO · 1,870 → 1,870
+22Tracked matches · now 824
0.0ppWin rate · 51.7% → 51.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 25 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,670 +2,671 14 Feb28 Aug · 8 days played
24,99927,670peak 27,67014 Feb28 Aug
27,836Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,870Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2025-12-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,870
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 131 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,670
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,330 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.2%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy18.7%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.891.061.070.18 short
Match win rate47.0%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPoopburger GoyslopoffFACEITLevel 8 · 1,870 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER27,670 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,870csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning54
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD61372Last 10061%Win rateLLLLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time546ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 8–0 · overpass, 28 Mar
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · ancient, 17 May
375msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · debris, 5 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 3 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L4Current streak
36In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 22ancientWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2215768%0.02
dust2A2113862%0.02
infernoB1910953%0.04
nukeA159660%0.03
ancientC52340%-0.03
overpassA53260%0.08
poseidon43175%0.05
anubis43175%0.02
cache220100%0.03
vertigo1010%-0.03
eldorado110100%0.14
debris1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

175,977Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
6,992Matches
47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
52.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
18.7%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 8 players
21,986MVPs
4,006Hours (in match)
8,350Bombs planted
2,476Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4759,596
AWP19,753
Knife4,130
MP94,033
MAC-103,606
P2503,286

Lifetime map wins

15,203dust2
11,026inferno
5,481train
2,830nuke
2,671vertigo
2,037cbble
134lake
70office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,310Matches
51%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
72.7ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6052%0.9414.4
Dust23339%1.0616.2
Inferno1932%0.9514.1
Ancient1759%0.9414.0
Anubis1540%0.8513.1
Nuke1346%1.0414.8
Cache1275%1.1616.8
Vertigo520%0.8314.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
556msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
54.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
12.50HE damage / grenade
7.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5477% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0217%7 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0320%7 Sept
dust211–130.0326%1 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0316%28 Aug
dust213–3-0.0219%28 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0310%28 Aug
vertigo12–16-0.0319%27 Aug
poseidon9–5-0.0310%18 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0331%18 Aug
poseidon6–9-0.0122%17 Aug
inferno9–20.0720%17 Aug
poseidon9–70.0521%14 Aug
eldorado9–30.1424%13 Aug
poseidon9–20.1828%13 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0228%13 Aug
cache13–5-0.0320%9 Aug
mirage13–110.0415%7 Aug
debris5–9-0.0017%5 Aug
nuke7–130.0824%28 Jun
dust27–13-0.0113%26 May
inferno8–13-0.0622%26 May
cache13–90.0931%17 May
mirage13–8-0.0228%17 May
dust211–13-0.0220%17 May
ancient13–50.0338%17 May
dust28–13-0.0519%3 May
mirage13–7-0.0018%27 Apr
dust214–16-0.029%26 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0116%20 Apr
inferno13–90.0218%19 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0016%10 Apr
dust213–80.0526%28 Mar
inferno9–60.1032%28 Mar
mirage15–150.0518%28 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0115%28 Mar
overpass8–00.2916%28 Mar
dust213–90.0322%28 Mar
nuke13–100.0119%28 Mar
mirage13–60.0824%28 Mar
nuke14–160.0922%28 Mar
overpass6–13-0.047%28 Mar
inferno8–80.1327%28 Mar
nuke10–130.0522%27 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0218%27 Mar
dust213–20.0830%27 Mar
overpass13–160.0920%26 Mar
mirage16–130.0816%26 Mar
inferno13–60.0115%26 Mar
dust27–130.0418%26 Mar
dust29–130.0428%26 Mar
nuke13–90.0824%26 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0518%8 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0320%8 Mar
dust213–90.0226%8 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0213%8 Mar
nuke2–13-0.0314%8 Mar
dust213–60.0215%8 Mar
mirage5–130.0323%8 Mar
mirage13–100.0315%8 Mar
mirage13–90.1028%8 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0238%8 Mar
dust213–5-0.018%7 Mar
nuke13–70.0016%7 Mar
nuke9–50.1032%7 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0221%7 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0519%22 Feb
mirage13–110.0416%22 Feb
inferno9–20.1516%22 Feb
dust213–90.0830%17 Feb
overpass13–80.0725%15 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0221%15 Feb
mirage13–60.1028%15 Feb
dust213–100.0728%15 Feb
dust213–90.0517%14 Feb
anubis13–40.0911%14 Feb
inferno9–40.1437%12 Feb
nuke13–90.0221%11 Feb
dust213–50.0131%11 Feb
mirage13–20.0519%11 Feb
dust27–13-0.014%11 Feb
mirage13–70.0728%11 Feb
dust213–50.0317%8 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0232%8 Feb
inferno13–160.0433%31 Jan
ancient5–13-0.0617%31 Jan
mirage13–70.0124%31 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0311%31 Jan
dust213–7-0.0122%24 Jan
inferno9–40.169%19 Jan
mirage7–10.0133%12 Jan
anubis13–60.0524%12 Jan
inferno9–30.0716%10 Jan
nuke13–60.0225%5 Jan
ancient13–7-0.0721%3 Jan
nuke13–1-0.0224%3 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0636%2 Jan
nuke13–60.0532%2 Jan
inferno5–9-0.0926%29 Dec
nuke9–30.0817%25 Dec
inferno9–40.1820%25 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →