Ladiesman217(washed)

Ladiesman217(washed) — CS2 Stats

76561198189606477[U:1:229340749]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,452Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,598Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating17,715Purple band · top ~17.6% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,715 +862 23 Jul17 Sept · 37 days played
16,75219,800peak 19,80023 Jul17 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-07-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,085 below peak (19,800)
  • -1,282 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,285 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches81+7
Win rate25%0%+25pp
K/D0.840.39+0.45
Headshot %54%46%+8pp

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=34,112), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate46.8%44.3%47.0%meets
Shot accuracy11.2%11.8%13.0%1.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.851.031.080.24 short
Match win rate39.2%45.2%46.7%7.5% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLadiesman217(washed)PREMIER17,715 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning47
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48493Last 10048%Win rateLLWLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.2
Utility4.4
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels3.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.7
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time537ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–11 · mirage, 14 Aug
67%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · ancient, 26 Aug
398msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 5 Aug
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 9anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA33181555%-0.01
infernoB21101148%-0.00
dust2B21101148%0.01
ancientA95456%0.00
anubisD82625%-0.02
cacheC73443%0.01
nuke1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

102,981Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
5,731Matches
39.2%Match win rate
46.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
11.2%Shot accuracy
10,636MVPs
2,598Hours (in match)
3,162Bombs planted
1,375Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,658
AWP14,420
SSG 082,705
Knife1,618
MAC-101,385
MP91,118

Lifetime map wins

12,537dust2
7,464inferno
2,747vertigo
1,194nuke
816train
126safehouse
108cbble
95ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
532msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
7.92HE damage / grenade
3.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.6601 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.755% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0625%17 Sept
inferno7–13-0.019%17 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0222%14 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0416%14 Sept
dust210–130.0625%11 Sept
dust213–10-0.0124%11 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0211%8 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0813%7 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0726%1 Sept
inferno1–13-0.1250%30 Aug
inferno13–70.0429%30 Aug
dust211–130.0230%30 Aug
inferno8–130.0214%30 Aug
ancient7–130.0019%30 Aug
dust28–13-0.0331%30 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0313%30 Aug
mirage16–130.0216%28 Aug
dust213–90.1016%28 Aug
cache4–13-0.0913%26 Aug
ancient3–0-0.0267%26 Aug
ancient13–70.0433%26 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0330%26 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0722%26 Aug
dust213–50.0615%25 Aug
cache9–130.0335%22 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0028%21 Aug
dust213–90.0623%21 Aug
mirage13–30.0127%21 Aug
nuke3–13-0.056%21 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0113%20 Aug
mirage13–90.0429%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0334%19 Aug
mirage14–160.0215%15 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0224%15 Aug
cache13–160.1010%14 Aug
inferno13–3-0.035%14 Aug
cache13–110.0327%14 Aug
mirage13–100.0117%14 Aug
ancient13–70.0325%14 Aug
inferno13–90.0034%14 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0028%14 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0113%14 Aug
mirage13–110.1114%14 Aug
dust27–13-0.0922%14 Aug
dust26–13-0.0526%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0319%12 Aug
inferno4–130.0119%12 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0228%10 Aug
mirage16–130.0315%10 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0822%10 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0719%10 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0216%10 Aug
anubis13–50.0110%10 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0016%10 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0214%10 Aug
dust216–130.0919%9 Aug
mirage13–60.0113%9 Aug
mirage13–60.0827%9 Aug
inferno12–160.0022%9 Aug
anubis7–130.0020%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0223%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0223%8 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0419%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0127%8 Aug
dust213–110.0415%7 Aug
inferno13–40.0517%7 Aug
mirage11–130.0522%7 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0027%6 Aug
inferno13–60.0312%6 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0116%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0319%5 Aug
dust25–13-0.0118%5 Aug
dust213–60.0411%5 Aug
mirage8–130.0119%5 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0410%5 Aug
dust27–13-0.0421%5 Aug
inferno13–60.0320%5 Aug
dust26–13-0.080%4 Aug
ancient13–90.0914%4 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0226%4 Aug
dust213–60.0217%3 Aug
inferno13–100.0215%2 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0331%2 Aug
inferno9–130.0324%1 Aug
inferno13–70.0523%1 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0338%31 Jul
cache15–15-0.0615%31 Jul
mirage13–50.0117%30 Jul
cache13–30.0422%30 Jul
dust24–13-0.0319%30 Jul
dust27–13-0.0118%29 Jul
dust213–7-0.0016%29 Jul
dust213–9-0.0431%29 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0216%28 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0321%28 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0623%28 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0417%27 Jul
cache16–130.0419%26 Jul
mirage13–90.0122%23 Jul
dust25–130.0221%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →