Tajwan — CS2 Stats

BS76561198189559313[U:1:229293585]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,410Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,724Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAll-Rounder

Premier CS Rating21,715Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#52307 of 219961 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 25 days played since 11 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,715 -3,417 11 Jun – 10 Sept · 25 days played

28,262Peak Premier in tracked matches

25Days played since 2026-06-11

Premier CS Rating

6,532 below peak (28,247)
-3,417 over 90 days
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,285 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	36.2%	46.8%	48.3%	12.1% short
Shot accuracy	15.7%	13.0%	13.2%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.30	1.06	1.07	above
Match win rate	52.2%	46.3%	46.9%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning61

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–40–3Last 10057%Win rateWLWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · +112ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 11%
Avg reaction 641ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 631ms

Last 20

11–9 · 55% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 11%
Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.1

Utility5.7

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels5.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning6.1

Utility5.7

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels4.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time572ms+32ms

first ⅓ avg 540ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms

Headshot accuracy12.3%−4.6%

first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 12.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 10 Jul →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · inferno, 30 Jun →

359msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · inferno, 17 Jul →

13–0Biggest win · inferno, 14 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 80% over 10cacheWeakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	23	14–9	61%	0.03
anubis	A	20	12–8	60%	0.04
ancient	B	15	7–8	47%	0.03
nuke	B	13	7–6	54%	0.03
mirage	S	10	8–2	80%	0.04
cache	D	9	3–6	33%	0.03
dust2	S	9	6–3	67%	0.03
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

172,794Lifetime kills

1.30K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players

7,107Matches

52.2%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 8 players

36.2%Headshot %

15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players

22,043MVPs

3,200Hours (in match)

5,273Bombs planted

1,739Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4758,929

M4A4 / M4A1-S33,808

AWP14,069

P2000 / USP-S7,897

Desert Eagle6,153

Glock-185,713

MP95,486

P904,468

MAC-104,462

Tec-94,424

Lifetime map wins

11,823inferno

6,035dust2

2,312train

2,078nuke

1,388cbble

670vertigo

64lake

50shorttrain

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.9%Headshot accuracy

38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.6%Spray accuracy

82.8%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

563msReaction time

37.8%T opening success

53.8%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

2.7%Flash assists

14.02HE damage / grenade

7.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.9101% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4168 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.8466% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–8	0.04	15%	10 Sept →
inferno	1–13	0.03	9%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	6%	25 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	16%	25 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.03	9%	24 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	17%	24 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	24%	24 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.05	10%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.04	9%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.03	11%	23 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	6%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.10	9%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	6%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.03	10%	20 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.02	6%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.03	10%	20 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.01	9%	20 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.01	12%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	13%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.08	5%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.04	15%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.08	29%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	24%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.06	9%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.01	11%	18 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.06	7%	18 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.04	13%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.10	10%	17 Jul →
inferno	0–13	-0.13	17%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.09	17%	17 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.08	22%	17 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	7%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.05	12%	17 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.05	22%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.01	8%	15 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.03	22%	15 Jul →
inferno	14–16	0.07	13%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.10	11%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.04	8%	13 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.01	8%	13 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	15%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.02	7%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.08	18%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.04	5%	11 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.08	8%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.05	10%	11 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	11%	11 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	14%	11 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.06	16%	11 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	15%	11 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.15	18%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.03	9%	11 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	13%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.09	16%	10 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.05	13%	10 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.02	14%	10 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.02	24%	10 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	4%	10 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.07	17%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.17	22%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.21	18%	10 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.02	25%	9 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.03	30%	9 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	17%	9 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.02	27%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.03	13%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.20	20%	9 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.00	21%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.06	18%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	22%	5 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.03	15%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	6%	5 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.00	14%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.07	34%	3 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	16%	3 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.05	11%	2 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	13%	2 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.03	20%	2 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.10	15%	2 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.04	16%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	16%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.00	15%	1 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.03	12%	30 Jun →
anubis	10–13	0.05	16%	30 Jun →
inferno	3–0	0.01	50%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.11	18%	18 Jun →
anubis	13–2	0.14	16%	18 Jun →
overpass	0–13	-0.02	29%	17 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.04	13%	16 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.01	14%	16 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.08	21%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.05	12%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.11	20%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.17	15%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–0	0.04	11%	14 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.06	13%	14 Jun →
dust2	16–13	0.06	15%	13 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	12%	13 Jun →
ancient	1–5	0.00	0%	13 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.01	17%	11 Jun →