Schkmidt — CS2 Stats

76561198186399999[U:1:226134271]

1,393Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,170Hours in CS63Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.9 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating25,921Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2429 of 25535 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,343 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	45.8%	49.0%	52.0%	6.2% short
Shot accuracy	13.6%	13.1%	13.7%	meets
Kill/death ratio	1.40	1.08	1.08	above
Match win rate	74.3%	46.9%	48.8%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning73

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateWWLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.6

Aggression10.0

Utility6.2

Positioning7.3

Opening Duels6.2

Clutch5.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 45% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning7.3

Utility6.2

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels6.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time448ms−82ms

first ⅓ avg 530ms → last ⅓ avg 448ms

Headshot accuracy21.4%−2.0%

first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 13–2

13–1Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

W2Current streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 79% over 14nukeWeakest map · 25% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	23	12–11	52%	0.03
mirage	B	22	10–12	45%	-0.00
inferno	A	21	12–9	57%	0.02
cache	S	14	11–3	79%	0.04
nuke	D	12	3–9	25%	0.02
anubis	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.03
ancient	—	4	3–1	75%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

107,398Lifetime kills

1.40K/D · Top 10% of Level 9 players

9,814Matches

74.3%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 9 players

45.8%Headshot %

13.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players

12,906MVPs

1,931Hours (in match)

5,264Bombs planted

1,315Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,279

AWP19,863

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,087

Desert Eagle7,547

P2000 / USP-S4,348

Glock-182,493

P2502,106

P901,457

Galil AR1,399

SSG 081,158

Lifetime map wins

11,035dust2

7,362inferno

2,038nuke

937train

601vertigo

498cbble

128office

125dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

273Matches

54%Win rate

1.26Avg K/D

80.0ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	49	59%	1.27	16.9
Dust2	45	51%	1.26	14.4
Inferno	39	64%	1.30	16.7
Ancient	18	61%	1.30	15.7
Cache	17	71%	1.47	17.8
Nuke	10	60%	1.62	16.6
Anubis	6	17%	0.84	12.5
Overpass	3	33%	0.95	16.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy

35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.3%Spray accuracy

78.7%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

457msReaction time

45.3%T opening success

64.4%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

7.9%Flash assists

10.79HE damage / grenade

12.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–9	0.06	23%	29 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.05	21%	28 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.06	35%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	21%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.00	20%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.02	17%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	15%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	25%	27 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.04	15%	27 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.03	8%	27 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	29%	27 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	11%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.01	26%	26 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.03	24%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.04	15%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.09	23%	26 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.00	14%	26 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.08	16%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	17%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.09	31%	25 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.04	28%	23 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	26%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	22%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	19%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.03	23%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.04	30%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	40%	22 Aug →
inferno	0–13	-0.09	0%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	23%	21 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	14%	21 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	30%	20 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	29%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.04	16%	20 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	25%	20 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.05	28%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.04	40%	17 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	21%	17 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.11	34%	16 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.03	22%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	17%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	20%	15 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.05	22%	15 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.03	28%	12 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	11%	11 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.03	17%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.05	22%	10 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	38%	10 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	33%	10 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	13%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	18%	9 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.02	26%	9 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.05	17%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.04	41%	9 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	31%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	21%	7 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	20%	7 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.12	60%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	18%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	24%	5 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.13	26%	31 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.04	23%	29 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.00	24%	27 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	20%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	27%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	20%	26 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.03	36%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	16%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.10	22%	25 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	29%	22 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	42%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.03	40%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.03	25%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.09	13%	20 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.08	24%	19 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.04	22%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.16	17%	19 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	15%	18 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.08	25%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.00	34%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	22%	15 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	31%	14 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	17%	14 Jul →
inferno	8–8	-0.01	30%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	20%	9 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.01	23%	9 Jul →
cache	5–1	0.03	44%	9 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.11	18%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.03	27%	7 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.05	21%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.04	21%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.07	15%	5 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	17%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	8%	4 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	11%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.02	28%	4 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.04	17%	4 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	33%	4 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	23%	4 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	19%	4 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.06	25%	4 Jul →