Ja_K1

Ja_K1 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198184328069[U:1:224062341]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,465Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
11,833Hours in CS66Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,043 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,043 → 2,043
+25Tracked matches · now 5,465
+3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,617 -930 9 Apr – 2 Sept · 12 days played
19,78721,865peak 21,8659 Apr2 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,043 +0 2 Sept – 22 Sept · 2 observations
2,0432,043peak 2,0432 Sept22 Sept
21,865Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,043Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-03-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,043
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 457 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches37——
Win rate43%——
K/D2.30——
Headshot %65%——

Measured 22 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches134——
Win rate47%——
K/D1.49——
Headshot %60%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,327), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate39.3%48.2%50.9%11.6% short
Shot accuracy15.1%13.3%13.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.071.090.08 short
Match win rate39.9%46.9%48.4%8.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJa_K1FACEITLevel 9 · 2,043 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,043csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning52
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateWWWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 458ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility5.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time525ms−78ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 22 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · cache, 17 Aug →
383msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · inferno, 7 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 17 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD3010–2033%-0.02
ancientS2215–768%-0.00
cacheB178–947%-0.01
dust2D92–722%-0.02
nukeS75–271%-0.01
overpassC73–443%-0.00
office—21–150%0.01
mirage—21–150%-0.06
anubis—21–150%0.06
vertigo—10–10%-0.07
sanctum—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

255,099Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
11,525Matches
39.9%Match win rate
39.3%Headshot %
15.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
25,828MVPs
5,358Hours (in match)
8,455Bombs planted
3,205Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4789,221
AWP32,963
Knife6,730
MP94,862
MAC-104,604
FAMAS4,326

Lifetime map wins

25,609inferno
16,275dust2
6,361nuke
2,412train
2,260vertigo
1,169cbble
119safehouse
115lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,814Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
79.0ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient72456%1.0216.2
Inferno62849%0.9915.5
Dust229549%0.9715.3
Anubis22242%0.9414.8
Nuke21145%0.8914.1
Overpass15348%1.0014.7
Mirage11036%0.9215.3
Cache7755%0.8713.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
516msReaction time
34.7%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
8.84HE damage / grenade
4.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.6661% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–5-0.015%1 Oct →
ancient13–20.0412%1 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0124%26 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0327%24 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0211%23 Sept →
ancient13–60.1321%22 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0218%20 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0517%20 Sept →
inferno13–50.015%18 Sept →
cache13–50.0421%18 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0312%13 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0721%13 Sept →
inferno10–130.0121%9 Sept →
office1–130.0117%7 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0411%7 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0414%7 Sept →
office13–70.0212%4 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0422%3 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0418%3 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0113%3 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.055%28 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0214%27 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0625%25 Aug →
ancient13–70.0225%23 Aug →
nuke13–110.0020%22 Aug →
ancient13–80.0831%20 Aug →
inferno11–130.0214%20 Aug →
cache8–13-0.1012%19 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0215%19 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.035%19 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0718%17 Aug →
cache3–13-0.080%17 Aug →
nuke13–2-0.0530%17 Aug →
inferno10–130.0016%17 Aug →
cache13–10.0650%17 Aug →
ancient13–80.0114%17 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0114%17 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0518%10 Aug →
ancient13–50.0031%10 Aug →
cache7–130.0624%10 Aug →
inferno8–130.0122%10 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0622%12 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.1017%12 Jul →
ancient13–3-0.0011%10 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0314%3 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0518%2 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0712%2 Jul →
inferno8–8-0.0826%30 Jun →
inferno9–40.0641%30 Jun →
vertigo5–9-0.0715%30 Jun →
dust216–14-0.0124%22 Jun →
overpass13–110.0521%22 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0229%22 Jun →
inferno10–130.0417%15 Jun →
nuke13–90.0315%15 Jun →
cache13–11-0.0518%15 Jun →
ancient11–130.0122%9 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0421%9 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0819%9 Jun →
cache13–40.0113%31 May →
sanctum7–9-0.0215%31 May →
inferno8–80.0016%31 May →
ancient13–20.0518%28 May →
ancient13–70.0315%28 May →
nuke17–19-0.0316%26 May →
overpass8–130.1026%26 May →
inferno13–8-0.0320%12 May →
inferno16–130.1021%12 May →
cache13–100.0017%11 May →
inferno9–13-0.0321%8 May →
cache13–9-0.0226%7 May →
cache12–120.0726%5 May →
cache8–13-0.0018%5 May →
overpass6–13-0.0616%24 Apr →
overpass9–4-0.0317%24 Apr →
inferno0–9-0.230%24 Apr →
dust211–130.0043%23 Apr →
nuke13–40.0310%23 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.069%23 Apr →
overpass6–13-0.0210%21 Apr →
dust213–110.0116%19 Apr →
overpass9–13-0.0310%17 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0229%16 Apr →
anubis3–130.0026%15 Apr →
inferno13–8-0.017%14 Apr →
dust215–150.0215%13 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0413%13 Apr →
inferno14–160.0315%13 Apr →
inferno7–130.0830%13 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0117%11 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0932%11 Apr →
ancient19–160.0518%10 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0625%9 Apr →
overpass13–10-0.0411%9 Apr →
inferno16–19-0.0220%9 Apr →
mirage16–14-0.037%8 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.027%8 Apr →
anubis13–40.1213%7 Apr →
ancient13–20.0116%1 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0717%31 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.