toob

toob — CS2 Stats

US76561198183973459[U:1:223707731]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,459Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,163Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating21,343Top 50% of 188,431 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#59734 of 233939 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,352 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−40Premier CS Rating · 21,383 → 21,343
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 25 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,343 +1,608 28 Jul21 Sept · 23 days played
19,00821,855peak 21,85528 Jul21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,352 +0 30 Aug10 Sept · 4 observations
1,3521,352peak 1,35230 Aug10 Sept
22,024Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,352Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-07-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,352
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 179 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 512 below peak (21,855)
  • -344 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,657 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,717), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate58.7%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy2.7%12.7%13.0%10.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.431.051.06above
Match win rate45.5%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtoobFACEITLevel 7 · 1,352 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,343 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,352csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning60
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53416Last 10053%Win rateWLLWTWTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 532 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.1
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.0
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact9.3

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time603ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 7–13 · dust2, 7 Aug
62%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · ancient, 1 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 4 Aug
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 15 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 47% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2011955%0.00
anubisA1810856%0.00
mirageB178947%-0.00
ancientB168850%0.01
infernoS128467%0.00
nukeB63350%-0.01
cache41325%-0.02
overpass220100%0.00
office21150%0.01
train21150%0.03
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

58,652Lifetime kills
1.43K/D · Top 10% of Level 7 players
2,336Matches
45.5%Match win rate
58.7%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 7 players
2.7%Shot accuracy
4,865MVPs
1,466Hours (in match)
2,689Bombs planted
779Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,818dust2
2,225inferno
2,098nuke
686train
484vertigo
86office
7italy
1cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

474Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
74.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10645%1.0314.0
Dust210344%0.9813.9
Ancient10358%1.1315.6
Anubis5763%1.0815.7
Nuke4260%1.1515.6
Overpass2560%1.0415.6
Inferno2232%0.8913.6
Train1173%1.2117.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.9%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
602msReaction time
24.2%T opening success
57.5%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
11.6%Flash assists
13.23HE damage / grenade
6.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.2447% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–9-0.0118%21 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0616%21 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0112%14 Sept
anubis13–110.0425%14 Sept
dust215–15-0.0319%11 Sept
ancient13–80.0318%10 Sept
cache15–15-0.0615%8 Sept
mirage13–110.009%8 Sept
ancient13–110.0522%8 Sept
cache5–130.0020%5 Sept
dust213–1-0.0328%5 Sept
dust211–130.0118%4 Sept
dust21–130.0239%4 Sept
inferno13–90.0021%1 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0215%31 Aug
anubis10–130.0220%30 Aug
overpass13–110.0219%26 Aug
office13–40.0220%26 Aug
dust26–13-0.0517%25 Aug
inferno13–90.0021%25 Aug
dust213–90.0832%20 Aug
ancient13–10.0727%20 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0824%20 Aug
mirage19–150.0316%16 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0211%16 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0216%15 Aug
overpass13–5-0.0115%15 Aug
train6–00.0132%15 Aug
office8–130.0020%15 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0331%15 Aug
nuke13–100.0319%15 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0115%15 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0618%15 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0315%15 Aug
dust213–00.0919%15 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0415%15 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0231%15 Aug
anubis13–50.0115%13 Aug
cache13–9-0.0121%13 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0513%13 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0115%13 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0712%12 Aug
ancient7–130.0325%11 Aug
dust213–80.0615%11 Aug
inferno10–130.0425%11 Aug
anubis25–230.0415%10 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0216%10 Aug
anubis13–80.0523%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0624%9 Aug
anubis13–80.0411%9 Aug
dust216–14-0.0412%9 Aug
anubis16–12-0.0210%9 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0318%8 Aug
ancient9–130.0316%8 Aug
mirage9–130.0219%8 Aug
dust27–130.159%7 Aug
dust213–8-0.0117%7 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0113%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0326%7 Aug
anubis9–130.0012%7 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0117%5 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0831%5 Aug
mirage13–30.0417%5 Aug
dust213–9-0.0515%5 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0525%5 Aug
nuke11–130.0539%5 Aug
mirage11–130.0624%5 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0018%5 Aug
dust26–13-0.0322%4 Aug
mirage13–70.0633%4 Aug
anubis13–60.0924%4 Aug
ancient13–50.1126%3 Aug
dust213–8-0.0328%3 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0115%3 Aug
inferno13–70.0818%3 Aug
anubis13–40.0410%2 Aug
dust213–100.0433%2 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0328%2 Aug
mirage12–120.0117%2 Aug
dust22–13-0.038%2 Aug
ancient0–13-0.0413%2 Aug
train9–130.0628%1 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0219%1 Aug
anubis9–13-0.1042%1 Aug
inferno6–00.0340%1 Aug
inferno2–60.0917%1 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0310%1 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0412%1 Aug
ancient8–130.0262%1 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0343%31 Jul
dust213–10-0.0327%31 Jul
dust29–130.0316%31 Jul
mirage13–70.0410%30 Jul
dust213–9-0.0112%30 Jul
dust28–13-0.039%30 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0513%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0224%28 Jul
ancient16–120.0317%28 Jul
mirage10–130.0133%28 Jul
cache6–130.0113%25 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →