amp

amp — CS2 Stats

US76561198180354687[U:1:220088959]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,786Tracked matches30%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,505Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,523Purple band · top ~14.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,222 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,786 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,523 -2,409 25 Jul – 21 Sept · 25 days played
18,52322,434peak 22,43425 Jul21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,222 +0 29 Aug – 21 Sept · 4 observations
1,2221,222peak 1,22229 Aug21 Sept
22,599Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,222Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-07-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,222
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 129 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,911 below peak (22,434)
  • -3,718 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,477 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 20 Sep 2026 and 16 Oct 2026.

Measured 20 Sep 2026 → 16 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,110), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate49.6%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy5.7%12.4%12.7%7.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.121.031.05above
Match win rate42.4%45.2%45.7%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGampFACEITLevel 6 · 1,222 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,523 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,222csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning46
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateLLWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +5.2pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 4–16 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.6
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time592ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 9 Aug →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · cache, 25 Jul →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · anubis, 15 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 22 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D206–1430%-0.02
nukeC207–1335%-0.00
ancientC208–1240%-0.01
cacheA148–657%0.03
anubisA117–464%-0.00
infernoD72–529%0.01
mirageA74–357%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

80,864Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
3,373Matches
42.4%Match win rate
49.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
5.7%Shot accuracy
7,754MVPs
1,505Hours (in match)
4,199Bombs planted
1,183Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,522
AWP7,802
MP91,862
MAC-101,361
Tec-91,168

Lifetime map wins

7,755dust2
4,147inferno
3,682nuke
1,404vertigo
814train
461cbble
36office
16italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

492Matches
53%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
78.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9162%1.0314.9
Mirage8040%0.9515.0
Anubis7655%1.0014.8
Nuke7155%1.0916.3
Dust26256%1.1714.4
Inferno3829%0.8012.2
Vertigo3551%0.9612.9
Overpass1867%1.1417.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
597msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
36.3%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
8.83HE damage / grenade
11.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2862% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–13-0.0830%18 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0710%18 Sept →
anubis13–40.018%18 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0319%18 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0420%18 Sept →
inferno13–160.0016%12 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0032%12 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.019%12 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0113%11 Sept →
nuke7–130.0120%11 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0014%11 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.079%11 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.097%11 Sept →
dust211–13-0.067%11 Sept →
dust213–70.0218%11 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0617%7 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.078%6 Sept →
nuke13–40.0221%6 Sept →
dust29–13-0.028%6 Sept →
mirage13–80.0217%6 Sept →
ancient6–130.0226%6 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0621%29 Aug →
anubis13–50.0027%29 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0410%29 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0421%29 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0219%29 Aug →
dust29–130.0017%29 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0410%25 Aug →
nuke13–20.0122%25 Aug →
cache13–110.0811%22 Aug →
cache15–150.0021%22 Aug →
inferno13–80.0512%22 Aug →
ancient13–70.0413%22 Aug →
dust213–10.0517%22 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0418%21 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0113%20 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0126%20 Aug →
cache13–60.0917%18 Aug →
anubis13–20.0913%17 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0133%17 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.0617%17 Aug →
nuke13–60.0216%17 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0418%17 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0215%16 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0220%16 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0220%16 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0320%16 Aug →
anubis13–90.0212%16 Aug →
anubis13–50.0120%15 Aug →
ancient8–130.0618%15 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.058%15 Aug →
ancient13–90.0630%14 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0015%14 Aug →
cache15–150.0119%13 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0417%13 Aug →
ancient13–110.049%13 Aug →
ancient6–130.0214%13 Aug →
dust27–130.0118%12 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.078%12 Aug →
nuke13–90.027%12 Aug →
ancient13–20.0616%12 Aug →
inferno13–110.0616%12 Aug →
cache13–100.0213%11 Aug →
cache13–10.2115%9 Aug →
cache13–4-0.026%9 Aug →
nuke7–130.0319%8 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0024%8 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0315%8 Aug →
anubis13–80.0410%8 Aug →
nuke13–80.0123%8 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0310%7 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0318%7 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0221%6 Aug →
vertigo13–100.0223%6 Aug →
nuke12–160.0413%6 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0712%5 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0412%4 Aug →
nuke11–130.0123%4 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0223%3 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0416%3 Aug →
nuke16–130.0314%1 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0414%29 Jul →
cache13–70.0424%29 Jul →
dust213–70.0016%29 Jul →
ancient13–80.0516%29 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0418%29 Jul →
dust24–130.0217%28 Jul →
inferno10–130.0316%28 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0537%27 Jul →
nuke12–120.0426%27 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0114%27 Jul →
anubis13–80.0219%27 Jul →
dust213–80.0017%27 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.056%27 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.019%27 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0118%27 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0518%25 Jul →
mirage13–20.0722%25 Jul →
cache13–10.0852%25 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0319%25 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.