crustbag — CS2 Stats

76561198176032253[U:1:215766525]

361Tracked matches53%Win rate2026Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 Developing

Premier CS Rating13,858Blue band · top ~34.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#32673 of 51021 tracked

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59

Positioning63

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateLWLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9

Aggression6.4

Utility3.1

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels3.7

Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9

Positioning6.3

Utility3.1

Mechanics5.7

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time589ms+14ms

first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms

Headshot accuracy16.6%−3.5%

first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — dust2 9–1

13–0Biggest win — overpass

8Longest win streak

8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 69% over 13cacheWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	21	10–11	48%	0.05
nuke	A	17	10–7	59%	0.01
vertigo	S	13	9–4	69%	0.06
inferno	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.01
cache	D	8	2–6	25%	0.02
office	B	8	4–4	50%	0.04
dust2	D	7	2–5	29%	0.04
overpass	—	3	3–0	100%	0.04
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	0.01
italy	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.05
poseidon	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.06
ancient	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.11
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches

32%Win rate

0.94Avg K/D

75.4ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win

6%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Cache	5	20%	0.85	12.2
Dust2	4	50%	1.12	18.3
Vertigo	2	100%	1.02	18.5
Mirage	2	0%	1.00	18.5
Nuke	2	0%	0.36	6.0
Ancient	2	0%	0.58	8.5
Anubis	2	50%	1.58	17.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy

32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.1%Spray accuracy

75.7%Counter-strafing

12.0°Preaim

582msReaction time

34.2%T opening success

55.6%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

3.4%Flash assists

1.90HE damage / grenade

3.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.9362 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.2394% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	6–13	0.12	14%	30 Aug →
vertigo	13–4	0.16	21%	30 Aug →
nuke	9–8	0.03	15%	30 Aug →
overpass	13–0	0.00	8%	30 Aug →
office	3–13	-0.10	14%	30 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.13	14%	29 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.02	17%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.18	19%	29 Aug →
train	9–12	-0.00	17%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.03	27%	29 Aug →
vertigo	13–1	0.09	11%	29 Aug →
italy	0–4	-0.10	0%	29 Aug →
overpass	12–5	0.07	16%	29 Aug →
overpass	13–8	0.04	12%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	28%	27 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.08	24%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.02	16%	27 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	18%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.05	12%	26 Aug →
boulder	7–13	-0.05	18%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	11%	23 Aug →
italy	6–13	0.01	22%	23 Aug →
nuke	6–9	-0.06	32%	22 Aug →
office	7–13	-0.04	32%	22 Aug →
poseidon	8–8	-0.02	11%	22 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.00	6%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.10	17%	21 Aug →
eldorado	9–5	0.11	14%	21 Aug →
inferno	6–9	-0.15	10%	21 Aug →
dust2	9–1	0.22	11%	21 Aug →
nuke	7–9	-0.04	19%	21 Aug →
nuke	4–4	-0.12	13%	20 Aug →
office	13–5	-0.00	27%	20 Aug →
nuke	6–9	0.01	18%	19 Aug →
poseidon	7–9	-0.09	22%	19 Aug →
office	6–13	0.04	32%	19 Aug →
office	7–0	0.08	23%	19 Aug →
office	13–4	0.20	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.16	12%	19 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	6%	18 Aug →
vertigo	4–13	-0.04	17%	18 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.09	13%	18 Aug →
mirage	1–6	-0.06	27%	16 Aug →
dust2	1–7	-0.12	33%	16 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.02	20%	16 Aug →
mirage	2–10	0.02	16%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.07	15%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.04	10%	16 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.06	14%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.06	12%	16 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.10	18%	15 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.09	21%	15 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	-0.02	21%	13 Aug →
inferno	1–7	-0.03	6%	13 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	11%	13 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.01	19%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.14	19%	13 Aug →
office	11–13	0.09	30%	12 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.04	14%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	16%	12 Aug →
mirage	1–13	0.02	15%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.07	11%	9 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	14%	9 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.04	17%	9 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.05	12%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	19%	8 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.05	13%	8 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.05	24%	8 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.02	31%	8 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.10	31%	8 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	16%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.07	18%	7 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.03	19%	6 Aug →
nuke	9–1	0.08	22%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.05	21%	6 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.03	20%	6 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.07	17%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.08	15%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.03	18%	6 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.05	14%	6 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	0.09	21%	6 Aug →
cache	2–13	0.02	20%	6 Aug →
mirage	3–12	0.08	26%	5 Aug →
inferno	11–0	0.06	33%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.07	14%	5 Aug →
vertigo	13–1	0.17	16%	30 Jul →
fachwerk	13–4	-0.01	18%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	0.05	10%	29 Jul →
vertigo	8–1	0.08	12%	29 Jul →
office	13–2	0.05	38%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	20%	28 Jul →
inferno	16–12	0.04	12%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.00	21%	28 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	17%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.07	16%	28 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	0.10	26%	27 Jul →
anubis	0–6	-0.01	25%	27 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.06	21%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.00	19%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	15%	27 Jul →