SeppQ

SeppQ — CS2 Stats

IE76561198175137686[U:1:214871958]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,949Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,928Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,981Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61182 of 221245 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,949 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 29 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,981 +2,044 29 Jul13 Sept · 22 days played
16,57923,583peak 23,58329 Jul13 Sept
24,288Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-07-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,602 below peak (23,583)
  • -1,808 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,019 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.9%48.3%51.0%2.1% short
Shot accuracy14.1%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.861.071.090.23 short
Match win rate45.7%46.9%48.4%2.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSeppQFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,981 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning41
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5743Last 10057%Win rateWLWLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility3.0
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.1
Utility3.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time559ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy28.7%+5.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 28.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 16 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 1 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 15 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 79% over 14anubisWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B178947%-0.03
infernoA169756%-0.02
mirageS1510567%-0.01
cacheS1411379%-0.01
anubisC146843%-0.00
nukeB137654%-0.02
ancientA116555%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

116,060Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
6,131Matches
45.7%Match win rate
48.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
13,627MVPs
3,421Hours (in match)
3,350Bombs planted
1,335Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,221
AWP17,821
P2502,734
SSG 082,712
FAMAS2,239

Lifetime map wins

10,908dust2
9,320inferno
7,321nuke
3,622train
2,322vertigo
1,006cbble
147office
24lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,254Matches
51%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
72.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3447%0.9114.4
Mirage3158%0.9014.1
Ancient2854%0.9514.8
Nuke2458%0.9615.0
Inferno2255%0.8915.1
Dust21662%1.0714.9
Overpass1258%0.9616.1
Cache944%0.9513.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.9%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
563msReaction time
22.4%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
6.09HE damage / grenade
3.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.689 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.3801% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.0622%6 Sept
cache9–13-0.0426%6 Sept
nuke13–20.0224%6 Sept
anubis7–130.0248%6 Sept
cache6–13-0.0650%1 Sept
dust25–13-0.0327%28 Aug
mirage13–00.0122%24 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0519%24 Aug
dust21–9-0.0344%16 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0319%16 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0931%16 Aug
mirage10–130.0524%16 Aug
dust27–13-0.0341%16 Aug
dust213–0-0.0229%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0824%16 Aug
ancient13–80.1033%16 Aug
dust214–16-0.0123%16 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0528%16 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0227%16 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0429%15 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0230%15 Aug
dust24–13-0.0742%15 Aug
cache16–13-0.0225%15 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0626%15 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0317%15 Aug
dust25–13-0.1021%14 Aug
nuke13–20.0330%14 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0833%14 Aug
anubis9–130.0040%14 Aug
cache13–7-0.0128%14 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0621%13 Aug
cache13–9-0.0724%13 Aug
dust213–80.0221%13 Aug
inferno13–110.0124%13 Aug
cache16–12-0.0526%13 Aug
inferno9–13-0.1114%13 Aug
anubis13–50.0512%13 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0428%13 Aug
ancient16–140.0516%13 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0616%12 Aug
cache13–50.0527%12 Aug
dust213–9-0.0533%12 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0228%12 Aug
anubis13–90.0419%11 Aug
ancient6–130.0530%11 Aug
mirage3–130.0234%11 Aug
dust213–8-0.0426%11 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0412%10 Aug
dust213–100.0323%10 Aug
nuke13–60.0727%10 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0122%10 Aug
cache16–130.0216%10 Aug
dust213–30.0219%10 Aug
inferno13–10.0114%9 Aug
nuke13–20.0420%9 Aug
mirage13–5-0.1013%9 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0426%7 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0336%7 Aug
mirage13–30.0321%7 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0241%7 Aug
cache13–9-0.0117%7 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0319%7 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0524%7 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0043%7 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0226%7 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0226%7 Aug
cache13–3-0.0020%7 Aug
inferno13–80.0524%7 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0638%6 Aug
anubis5–130.0321%6 Aug
dust29–13-0.1019%6 Aug
inferno11–130.0334%6 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0540%6 Aug
dust213–8-0.0028%5 Aug
dust213–60.0626%5 Aug
anubis9–130.1012%5 Aug
nuke8–13-0.080%5 Aug
cache13–60.0718%5 Aug
inferno3–13-0.1319%4 Aug
mirage13–70.0225%4 Aug
dust210–13-0.038%4 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0222%3 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0124%3 Aug
cache13–7-0.0327%3 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0312%3 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0317%3 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0131%2 Aug
inferno13–70.0412%2 Aug
inferno13–110.0926%2 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0222%2 Aug
cache13–90.0533%2 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0516%30 Jul
cache11–13-0.0713%30 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0136%30 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0129%30 Jul
mirage13–30.0023%29 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0121%29 Jul
nuke13–80.0136%29 Jul
ancient11–130.0415%29 Jul
dust22–12-0.1244%29 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →