xXX_Creamy_Gamer_XXx — CS2 Stats

76561198174956890[U:1:214691162]✓ No bans

1,613Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since

2,735Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning54

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–37–9Last 10054%Win rateLWLWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2

Aggression8.0

Utility5.9

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning5.4

Utility5.9

Mechanics5.4

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time520ms−75ms

first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms

Headshot accuracy18.5%+2.3%

first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — anubis 13–10

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 42% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	22	11–11	50%	0.03
cache	B	22	11–11	50%	0.02
mirage	A	17	10–7	59%	0.01
dust2	C	12	5–7	42%	0.02
ancient	S	8	6–2	75%	0.02
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	0.03
inferno	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.03
train	—	4	3–1	75%	0.05
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.09
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,202Lifetime kills

1.06K/D · Top 50% of tracked players

2,933Matches

39.3%Match win rate

37.3%Headshot %

5.2%Shot accuracy

4,657MVPs

994Hours (in match)

3,129Bombs planted

710Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,020

M4A4 / M4A1-S9,190

AWP5,068

P2000 / USP-S2,700

Desert Eagle2,436

MP92,245

Glock-181,991

MAC-101,374

Galil AR1,313

FAMAS812

Lifetime map wins

6,594nuke

3,881dust2

2,029inferno

1,332vertigo

509train

222office

49ar_baggage

37ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches

100%Win rate

0.97Avg K/D

85.9ADR

28%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Overpass	1	100%	0.69	11.0
Mirage	1	100%	1.40	21.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy

34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.7%Spray accuracy

74.3%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

518msReaction time

31.1%T opening success

50.9%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

7.68HE damage / grenade

12.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.1023% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	3–13	-0.02	19%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.09	30%	28 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.00	11%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.12	26%	27 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	31%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.05	15%	25 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.03	22%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.09	11%	24 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	21%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.01	14%	22 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.08	25%	21 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.08	15%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	17%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.17	23%	20 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.00	15%	20 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.03	21%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	18%	18 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.01	18%	16 Aug →
train	13–11	0.01	21%	16 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.03	17%	16 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.06	34%	16 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	13%	12 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	11%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.07	14%	11 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.03	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.03	20%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.03	22%	7 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.06	12%	7 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.02	13%	6 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	16%	20 Jul →
office	2–13	-0.09	22%	20 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.03	12%	20 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	12%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.07	7%	13 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.03	15%	12 Jul →
anubis	3–13	0.00	12%	12 Jul →
train	13–3	0.05	16%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	5%	12 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.04	12%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.00	18%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	10%	12 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	30%	12 Jul →
cache	2–6	0.07	26%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.06	20%	12 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.00	10%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	14%	12 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.05	16%	12 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	20%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.00	10%	12 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	33%	12 Jul →
train	10–13	0.04	19%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.07	20%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	15%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	39%	7 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	20%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	14%	5 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	20%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.12	14%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	28%	3 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	12%	3 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	20%	2 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	20%	1 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.10	22%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	12%	30 Jun →
overpass	13–7	-0.02	15%	26 Jun →
nuke	5–13	0.04	15%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.06	27%	25 Jun →
inferno	2–5	-0.04	19%	25 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.01	10%	25 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	14%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.09	17%	25 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.02	11%	25 Jun →
nuke	12–12	-0.03	10%	24 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	19%	24 Jun →
anubis	12–12	-0.03	8%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	21%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.06	11%	23 Jun →
inferno	7–2	-0.02	21%	23 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.03	15%	23 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.00	27%	23 Jun →
cache	10–13	0.10	18%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.03	15%	23 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.03	23%	22 Jun →
anubis	16–14	-0.01	12%	22 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.06	18%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	11%	21 Jun →
train	12–4	0.09	17%	21 Jun →
dust2	6–13	0.00	16%	21 Jun →
nuke	16–13	0.08	18%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.04	23%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	22%	21 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.03	19%	17 Jun →
dust2	7–1	0.12	26%	17 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.04	11%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.09	29%	17 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	13%	15 Jun →
cache	2–13	-0.02	0%	15 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.03	6%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–3	-0.00	15%	10 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.05	18%	10 Jun →