Yamii

Yamii — CS2 Stats

DE76561198172998659[U:1:212732931]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,779Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
5,217Hours in CS89Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,865Blue band · top ~50.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,377 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,865 +988 6 Sept – 1 Oct · 10 days played
9,17910,865peak 10,8656 Sept1 Oct
10,983Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,377Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-07-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,377
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 154 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 10,865
  • +988 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,135 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,886), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate62.3%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy8.3%12.7%13.0%4.8% short
Kill/death ratio2.111.051.06above
Match win rate46.0%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGYamiiFACEITLevel 7 · 1,377 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER10,865 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,377csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning59
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY29–67–4Last 10029%Win rateLWTWWWWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility5.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.05
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time563ms−115ms
first ⅓ avg 678ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−4.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 8–13 · cache, 4 Sept →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · office, 25 Jul →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 8 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 24 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
3–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 54% over 13officeWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC197–1237%0.04
cacheD184–1422%0.02
dust2D164–1225%0.02
ancientB137–654%0.04
anubisD102–820%0.01
nukeD82–625%0.04
officeD50–50%0.04
inferno—43–175%0.08
vertigo—40–40%0.00
train—30–30%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

291,084Lifetime kills
2.11K/D · Top 5% of Level 7 players
6,594Matches
46.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
62.3%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 7 players
8.3%Shot accuracy
21,648MVPs
2,113Hours (in match)
4,899Bombs planted
2,830Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47113,879
AWP33,377
P2505,306
SSG 084,530
MP94,192
FAMAS4,134

Lifetime map wins

8,664dust2
5,730inferno
5,340vertigo
3,876nuke
2,309cbble
1,639train
265office
232lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

69Matches
62%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
76.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1968%1.1016.2
Anubis1369%1.1214.8
Cache875%0.9314.1
Inferno743%0.7211.3
Mirage475%1.7415.5
Dust2333%0.5811.0
Overpass367%0.8210.7
Train250%1.1415.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
564msReaction time
65.6%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
9.76HE damage / grenade
8.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12–160.0215%1 Oct →
ancient13–70.0617%1 Oct →
dust215–150.0821%1 Oct →
mirage13–80.0224%1 Oct →
dust213–40.0818%30 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0327%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.0817%30 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0621%25 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0225%25 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0211%25 Sept →
vertigo6–130.0222%25 Sept →
office4–130.0218%25 Sept →
nuke7–130.0816%25 Sept →
office9–130.0931%24 Sept →
nuke13–100.1317%23 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0112%23 Sept →
ancient13–60.1021%23 Sept →
mirage7–130.0816%23 Sept →
mirage11–130.0024%20 Sept →
anubis13–100.1224%20 Sept →
mirage6–130.1122%19 Sept →
mirage16–120.0325%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0326%19 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0320%19 Sept →
dust23–130.0320%19 Sept →
ancient13–60.0216%19 Sept →
mirage10–130.0626%19 Sept →
cache13–50.1021%19 Sept →
mirage7–130.0322%19 Sept →
mirage11–130.0025%13 Sept →
cache12–120.0414%13 Sept →
inferno16–120.1319%13 Sept →
cache13–160.0617%11 Sept →
nuke5–130.0216%11 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0529%11 Sept →
dust26–130.0311%11 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0022%10 Sept →
anubis7–130.1021%8 Sept →
inferno13–40.1221%8 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0217%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.1518%6 Sept →
cache13–80.0930%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0620%4 Sept →
cache8–130.1725%4 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0518%4 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0325%28 Aug →
cache9–130.0223%28 Aug →
mirage13–70.1625%28 Aug →
ancient13–100.0420%28 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0123%27 Aug →
dust29–130.0824%27 Aug →
cache7–130.0022%26 Aug →
ancient13–100.0622%26 Aug →
inferno13–10.0325%24 Aug →
dust27–130.0227%23 Aug →
mirage5–130.0120%23 Aug →
cache11–130.1437%22 Aug →
nuke9–130.1332%15 Aug →
dust213–30.0518%15 Aug →
mirage13–60.1628%15 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0536%15 Aug →
train9–130.0020%15 Aug →
ancient9–130.1230%13 Aug →
mirage14–160.0316%13 Aug →
ancient16–140.1425%13 Aug →
train9–13-0.0523%9 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0139%9 Aug →
anubis9–130.0122%9 Aug →
cache5–13-0.129%7 Aug →
office9–13-0.0229%7 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0541%7 Aug →
nuke2–130.0029%7 Aug →
ancient3–130.0111%7 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0327%6 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.1215%6 Aug →
dust213–70.0330%6 Aug →
vertigo5–130.0135%31 Jul →
vertigo3–13-0.0419%30 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0713%30 Jul →
anubis3–130.0119%30 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0522%26 Jul →
office4–13-0.0041%26 Jul →
train2–13-0.0127%26 Jul →
cache1–130.0640%26 Jul →
dust24–130.0520%26 Jul →
office5–130.1346%25 Jul →
mirage13–90.0834%25 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0021%25 Jul →
dust212–120.0824%25 Jul →
nuke13–100.0117%25 Jul →
cache13–40.0118%25 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0313%24 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0419%22 Jul →
anubis10–130.0114%22 Jul →
dust22–130.0633%12 Jul →
cache5–130.0034%12 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0322%11 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0322%11 Jul →
mirage7–130.0129%11 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0035%11 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.