JakeJake — CS2 Stats
76561198168292686[U:1:208026958]✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 39.5% | 52.8% | 13.3% short |
| Shot accuracy | 11.5% | 13.7% | 2.2% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.12 | 1.08 | above |
| Match win rate | 49.4% | 49.2% | meets |
This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Sharp aimer
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 27 | 15–12 | 56% | 0.04 | |
| S | 27 | 19–8 | 70% | 0.04 | |
| S | 12 | 9–3 | 75% | 0.04 | |
| B | 10 | 5–5 | 50% | 0.04 | |
| S | 9 | 6–3 | 67% | 0.02 | |
| S | 7 | 5–2 | 71% | 0.04 | |
| D | 6 | 2–4 | 33% | 0.01 | |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.01 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 63 | 54% | 1.21 | 16.7 |
| Dust2 | 57 | 53% | 1.16 | 18.1 |
| Ancient | 29 | 59% | 1.16 | 17.4 |
| Inferno | 25 | 60% | 1.20 | 18.0 |
| Anubis | 20 | 70% | 1.45 | 17.5 |
| Nuke | 17 | 53% | 1.03 | 17.4 |
| Cache | 13 | 46% | 0.91 | 14.9 |
| Overpass | 6 | 33% | 1.37 | 20.2 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.6402% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 13% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.12 | 25% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.03 | 14% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.14 | 19% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 13% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 16% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 0–5 | -0.04 | 56% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.04 | 20% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 27% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.03 | 16% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.02 | 26% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 24% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.11 | 21% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.02 | 36% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.04 | 19% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.05 | 20% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.01 | 25% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 23% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.12 | 22% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.03 | 17% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.03 | 15% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.03 | 15% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.02 | 7% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.02 | 15% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.02 | 18% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.08 | 29% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.08 | 14% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.05 | 0% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.06 | 13% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.17 | 14% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 0–7 | -0.00 | 33% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 15% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.04 | 8% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.08 | 22% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 8% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 0–8 | -0.02 | 6% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.05 | 26% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.07 | 10% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.04 | 27% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.13 | 19% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.06 | 18% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 14% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 25% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 22% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.03 | 22% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 7% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 11% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.07 | 17% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.12 | 14% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.03 | 10% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 23% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 20% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.11 | 11% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 7–2 | 0.24 | 11% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 21% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 13% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.03 | 19% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.09 | 6% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.02 | 26% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.07 | 18% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 14% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 17% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 33% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.06 | 21% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 19% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 16% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 13% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 17% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 15% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.00 | 23% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 23% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 17% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.09 | 11% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 5% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.05 | 15% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 13% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 22% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.05 | 26% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 21% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.02 | 13% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.11 | 18% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 24% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.18 | 29% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.01 | 28% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.15 | 25% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.13 | 24% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.11 | 30% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.04 | 32% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.00 | 16% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.11 | 29% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 18% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.06 | 26% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.07 | 15% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.01 | 10% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.05 | 21% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 20 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.