Gamle

Gamle — CS2 Stats

DK76561198162491651[U:1:202225923]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,763Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,130Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating7,273Light Blue band · top ~67.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 22 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,273 +3,045 22 Jun21 Sept · 35 days played
4,2288,555peak 8,55522 Jun21 Sept
8,555Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2026-06-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,282 below peak (8,555)
  • +926 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,045 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 2,727 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,643), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate41.1%41.3%41.9%meets
Shot accuracy13.5%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.180.950.98above
Match win rate34.2%42.5%43.3%9.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGamleFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER7,273 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim38
Positioning45
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43543Last 10043%Win rateLWLTLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 709ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 695ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim3.8
Utility4.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 699ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.8
Positioning4.5
Utility4.4
Mechanics3.1
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time705ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 772ms → last ⅓ avg 705ms
Headshot accuracy10.2%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 11.3% → last ⅓ avg 10.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 26 Jul
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 23 Jul
500msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 14 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 15 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 56% over 18anubisWeakest map · 14% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB31161552%-0.03
ancientC27101737%-0.04
nukeA1810856%-0.03
anubisD1421214%-0.03
cacheD62433%-0.04
overpass330100%0.00
dust21010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

138,962Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 2 players
7,319Matches
34.2%Match win rate
41.1%Headshot %
13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
12,513MVPs
2,130Hours (in match)
5,002Bombs planted
1,500Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,234
AWP20,378
AUG6,144
Negev4,424
SG 5534,305

Lifetime map wins

10,579inferno
9,535nuke
4,462vertigo
1,417dust2
1,164train
317lake
154safehouse
147ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

98Matches
41%Win rate
0.65Avg K/D
68.6ADR
29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1275%1.0415.2
Nuke967%1.0310.4
Overpass520%1.0315.0
Anubis540%0.7613.0
Vertigo30%0.6310.0
Ancient333%0.789.7
Train250%1.1017.5
Mirage10%0.6911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.3%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
64.0%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
699msReaction time
24.9%T opening success
43.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
5.26HE damage / grenade
3.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.2602% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4788 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.9209% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–13-0.0811%21 Sept
ancient13–11-0.015%19 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0219%19 Sept
anubis15–15-0.006%19 Sept
inferno11–13-0.058%14 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0115%14 Sept
inferno10–13-0.049%12 Sept
ancient13–60.0214%9 Sept
anubis13–5-0.016%9 Sept
nuke16–13-0.0610%8 Sept
ancient13–60.0211%8 Sept
inferno13–8-0.033%8 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0210%6 Sept
nuke6–13-0.044%6 Sept
nuke10–130.029%5 Sept
inferno13–2-0.0214%29 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0412%28 Aug
ancient16–14-0.033%28 Aug
anubis4–13-0.039%26 Aug
cache2–13-0.0615%26 Aug
inferno9–13-0.042%26 Aug
anubis11–13-0.056%25 Aug
ancient11–0-0.0119%25 Aug
nuke13–40.0120%25 Aug
inferno11–13-0.086%25 Aug
nuke13–6-0.059%21 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0110%21 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0614%21 Aug
ancient13–40.0114%21 Aug
inferno16–13-0.106%19 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0512%18 Aug
inferno9–00.0510%18 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0418%17 Aug
ancient9–13-0.037%17 Aug
anubis10–130.059%17 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0310%17 Aug
inferno13–40.026%15 Aug
inferno13–0-0.046%15 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0613%14 Aug
ancient10–13-0.046%14 Aug
nuke15–150.016%14 Aug
ancient4–13-0.093%13 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0917%12 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0414%11 Aug
cache13–10-0.0310%11 Aug
ancient10–13-0.085%11 Aug
inferno13–110.016%10 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0514%6 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0511%3 Aug
cache13–9-0.0226%3 Aug
cache7–13-0.055%3 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0610%2 Aug
cache5–13-0.0717%2 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0513%2 Aug
anubis8–130.0110%1 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0215%1 Aug
anubis4–13-0.054%30 Jul
ancient13–11-0.036%27 Jul
cache15–15-0.0311%27 Jul
ancient3–13-0.1116%27 Jul
inferno13–40.0910%26 Jul
inferno0–13-0.0814%26 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0521%26 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0113%25 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0523%25 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0510%23 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0329%23 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0412%23 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0012%22 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0922%22 Jul
inferno14–160.0024%22 Jul
anubis7–13-0.083%22 Jul
nuke5–13-0.066%19 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0410%19 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0613%18 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0623%16 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0724%16 Jul
nuke13–20.0417%16 Jul
inferno7–13-0.013%13 Jul
nuke3–13-0.036%13 Jul
inferno11–130.019%13 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0515%13 Jul
anubis16–12-0.064%2 Jul
ancient9–13-0.066%2 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0712%2 Jul
inferno10–13-0.066%1 Jul
overpass13–20.056%1 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0318%1 Jul
overpass13–5-0.049%30 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0616%30 Jun
inferno5–13-0.087%30 Jun
inferno16–120.057%29 Jun
overpass13–90.0017%29 Jun
ancient13–100.016%29 Jun
nuke13–4-0.019%28 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0112%28 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0713%22 Jun
inferno4–13-0.1112%22 Jun
dust22–13-0.037%22 Jun
ancient11–13-0.036%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →