FlunderCalli

FlunderCalli — CS2 Stats

AW76561198162369338[U:1:202103610]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,806Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,729Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,982Purple band · top ~16.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#97294 of 221187 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 17 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,982 -239 17 Jun16 Sept · 31 days played
17,30419,480peak 19,48017 Jun16 Sept
19,742Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-06-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,498 below peak (19,480)
  • -985 over 30 days · declining
  • -239 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,018 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches100
Win rate60%
K/D1.04
Headshot %34%

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate34.3%44.9%45.8%11.5% short
Shot accuracy17.3%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.011.041.050.05 short
Match win rate41.7%45.3%45.7%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFlunderCalliFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,982 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning57
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateWLLWWWWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −7.3pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.9
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.7
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time601ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 29 Jul
72%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · cache, 26 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · cache, 18 Aug
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 20 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 53% over 15nukeWeakest map · 44% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC27121544%0.01
ancientB23121152%-0.00
anubisB1991047%-0.01
cacheB158753%0.03
infernoB63350%0.10
dust23030%-0.02
mirage21150%-0.02
overpass21150%0.02
debris110100%0.00
eldorado110100%-0.02
poseidon1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

138,872Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
6,081Matches
41.7%Match win rate
34.3%Headshot %
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
14,021MVPs
2,641Hours (in match)
5,544Bombs planted
1,528Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4744,500
AWP17,215
P2503,000
UMP-452,847
MAC-102,418

Lifetime map wins

8,358inferno
8,284nuke
4,381dust2
3,179train
1,595vertigo
1,141cbble
521lake
279safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

338Matches
53%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
82.4ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
39%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke7100%1.1617.6
Mirage617%0.538.8
Anubis667%0.8114.2
Ancient650%0.8616.3
Dust2333%0.8915.7
Overpass250%0.8611.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
591msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
63.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
10.69HE damage / grenade
8.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.8767% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–7-0.0213%16 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0417%16 Sept
dust25–13-0.0111%16 Sept
debris9–30.0014%16 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0010%12 Sept
ancient13–100.0213%12 Sept
cache13–90.0419%12 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0212%11 Sept
eldorado9–6-0.0211%11 Sept
poseidon8–80.0016%11 Sept
cache13–70.0712%29 Aug
ancient13–110.0210%29 Aug
cache6–13-0.0719%29 Aug
cache8–13-0.0372%26 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0233%26 Aug
nuke9–130.0311%25 Aug
inferno8–130.0910%25 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0114%25 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0110%23 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0318%19 Aug
cache15–150.059%19 Aug
nuke13–40.1922%19 Aug
cache13–100.0413%18 Aug
cache13–160.0513%18 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0113%18 Aug
cache10–130.0316%18 Aug
ancient13–90.0315%18 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0110%14 Aug
cache8–13-0.0118%14 Aug
ancient13–70.0115%14 Aug
anubis3–13-0.074%12 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0327%3 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0014%3 Aug
nuke2–13-0.099%31 Jul
mirage13–9-0.029%31 Jul
cache13–50.056%30 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0620%30 Jul
nuke9–60.0221%29 Jul
inferno9–10.349%29 Jul
nuke13–40.0922%27 Jul
inferno13–60.0913%27 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0419%27 Jul
nuke9–130.0017%27 Jul
cache13–160.0717%26 Jul
anubis8–13-0.054%26 Jul
nuke13–90.0220%26 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0919%25 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0016%24 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0716%24 Jul
anubis8–130.0211%23 Jul
cache13–110.058%23 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0714%22 Jul
anubis10–130.0010%22 Jul
ancient13–30.0217%22 Jul
ancient10–130.002%21 Jul
inferno13–20.1215%20 Jul
cache13–80.0210%20 Jul
ancient13–90.0411%20 Jul
ancient9–13-0.039%19 Jul
anubis13–110.0514%19 Jul
nuke13–20.1223%19 Jul
ancient2–130.0415%19 Jul
ancient8–130.007%18 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0424%18 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0112%18 Jul
cache13–6-0.0411%18 Jul
anubis13–70.0422%17 Jul
nuke13–40.0812%17 Jul
ancient8–13-0.037%17 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0112%16 Jul
cache13–70.0815%16 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0326%9 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0311%6 Jul
ancient10–130.0817%6 Jul
nuke13–110.0121%6 Jul
overpass13–50.0512%6 Jul
ancient13–110.047%5 Jul
anubis13–70.1218%5 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0024%5 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0320%5 Jul
nuke13–60.0612%5 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0013%3 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0419%3 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0110%2 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0116%2 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0420%2 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0211%2 Jul
nuke16–120.0513%29 Jun
ancient13–90.0119%29 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0511%29 Jun
anubis13–2-0.0212%25 Jun
ancient13–70.0414%25 Jun
nuke11–130.0319%25 Jun
anubis13–60.0318%22 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0113%22 Jun
dust28–13-0.0218%22 Jun
nuke11–13-0.029%17 Jun
dust23–13-0.0322%17 Jun
anubis7–13-0.1015%17 Jun
nuke6–130.0216%17 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →