Songhr2

Songhr2 — CS2 Stats

CN76561198159657138[U:1:199391410]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,214Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,918Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,311Top 50% of 201,197 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#75268 of 248422 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,119 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,311 +1,125 30 Jun – 2 Oct · 19 days played
17,20720,571peak 20,57130 Jun2 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,119 +0 6 Sept – 20 Sept · 4 observations
1,1191,119peak 1,1196 Sept20 Sept
20,571Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,119Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-06-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,119
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 82 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 260 below peak (20,571)
  • +2,029 over 30 days · improving
  • +704 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,689 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches42——
Win rate40%——
K/D0.92——
Headshot %50%——

Measured 6 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.1%46.8%48.2%3.1% short
Shot accuracy2.6%13.0%13.3%10.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.021.061.070.06 short
Match win rate43.4%46.3%46.9%3.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSonghr2FACEITLevel 8 · 1,119 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,311 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,119csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning65
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateLLWLTWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility5.2
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning6.5
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time574ms+22ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 18 Jul →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 9 Sept →
234msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · nuke, 3 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 61% over 38infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3823–1561%0.00
mirageB1910–953%-0.01
nukeD124–833%-0.00
ancientC114–736%-0.03
infernoD82–625%-0.02
anubisB63–350%-0.01
vertigo—32–167%0.03
cache—22–0100%-0.01
train—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

55,574Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
3,058Matches
43.4%Match win rate
45.1%Headshot %
2.6%Shot accuracy
9,021MVPs
1,135Hours (in match)
1,658Bombs planted
427Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

14,534dust2
2,315nuke
2,265inferno
1,016train
335vertigo
64office
17italy
14safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

154Matches
53%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
86.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24556%1.1616.6
Inferno3441%1.0415.6
Mirage2552%1.0616.5
Nuke1861%1.0917.4
Ancient1856%1.0916.4
Anubis956%1.0615.3
Overpass1100%1.1424.0
Cache1100%0.569.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
12.3°Preaim
571msReaction time
60.3%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
11.3%Flash assists
8.54HE damage / grenade
5.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2687° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.0820%2 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0117%2 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0410%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0615%2 Oct →
dust212–120.089%30 Sept →
dust213–60.0423%30 Sept →
nuke8–130.047%30 Sept →
anubis13–70.0527%24 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0518%23 Sept →
anubis13–70.0011%23 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0720%23 Sept →
cache13–8-0.008%23 Sept →
dust213–100.0218%20 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0022%20 Sept →
dust213–10.0715%17 Sept →
dust213–80.0017%17 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0413%16 Sept →
nuke13–100.0012%16 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0121%16 Sept →
nuke9–130.0823%11 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.017%11 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0120%11 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0413%9 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0727%9 Sept →
ancient13–110.0119%9 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0333%9 Sept →
mirage15–150.0621%9 Sept →
dust213–80.0317%9 Sept →
train11–13-0.0323%7 Sept →
dust213–70.0517%7 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0330%5 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0416%5 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0118%5 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0114%5 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0124%5 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0716%4 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0817%4 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0623%4 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0125%4 Sept →
inferno16–120.0421%4 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0223%4 Sept →
mirage13–110.0220%4 Sept →
mirage13–50.0821%4 Sept →
dust211–130.0423%3 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0716%3 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0633%3 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0218%3 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0725%2 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0315%2 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0317%31 Aug →
mirage13–40.0725%31 Aug →
mirage13–70.0215%31 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0123%30 Aug →
dust213–00.0118%30 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0515%30 Aug →
dust213–90.0317%30 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0415%30 Aug →
anubis7–130.0220%30 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.1322%29 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0112%22 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.048%22 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0720%22 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.048%22 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0019%13 Aug →
mirage6–130.0618%13 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0210%9 Aug →
dust213–90.0526%9 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0119%9 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0819%9 Aug →
vertigo12–12-0.0218%2 Aug →
vertigo13–20.0922%2 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0110%2 Aug →
ancient14–160.0114%2 Aug →
vertigo13–50.0318%1 Aug →
dust20–13-0.060%26 Jul →
dust20–13-0.060%26 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0212%26 Jul →
cache13–4-0.0112%26 Jul →
dust213–10.1219%26 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0224%26 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0113%26 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0317%25 Jul →
nuke13–30.0420%18 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0323%18 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0915%18 Jul →
dust213–10.1217%18 Jul →
ancient13–70.0211%17 Jul →
dust211–13-0.048%17 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0219%17 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.1018%17 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0612%13 Jul →
dust213–60.0214%3 Jul →
ancient13–30.0719%3 Jul →
dust213–110.0414%2 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0520%2 Jul →
dust211–130.0325%2 Jul →
dust213–80.0718%1 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.0220%1 Jul →
nuke11–130.0119%1 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0223%30 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.