Timmy

Timmy — CS2 Stats

AU76561198157094184[U:1:196828456]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

561Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,515Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,940Top 5% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7131 of 261628 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,940 +1,940 31 Aug – 28 Oct · 28 days played
25,00028,201peak 28,20131 Aug28 Oct
28,441Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,261 below peak (28,201)
  • -104 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,060 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches14——
Win rate29%——
K/D1.00——
Headshot %45%——

Measured 19 Oct 2026 → 15 Nov 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate38.0%41.8%42.7%4.7% short
Shot accuracy16.0%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.060.980.99above
Match win rate44.5%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTimmyFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER26,940 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning55
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD58–37–5Last 10058%Win rateWLTWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −67ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 403ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 437ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility6.3
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.5
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact1.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time484ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 531ms → last ⅓ avg 484ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–11 · dust2, 9 Sept →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · inferno, 25 Sept →
297msFastest reaction time · 2–6 · inferno, 8 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S3122–971%0.04
mirageB179–853%0.03
nukeS1510–567%0.06
infernoD124–833%-0.00
ancientB115–645%0.02
cacheC83–538%0.03
anubisS65–183%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,892Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
2,201Matches
44.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
38.0%Headshot %
16.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
4,836MVPs
869Hours (in match)
1,902Bombs planted
485Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,983dust2
2,734inferno
1,277nuke
675train
311cbble
254vertigo
77office
72lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

21Matches
43%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
—ADR
21%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
474msReaction time
57.2%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
12.55HE damage / grenade
14.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.497% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.0518%28 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0328%28 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.019%25 Oct →
dust213–30.0417%25 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0216%25 Oct →
cache11–130.0518%25 Oct →
cache13–20.0222%25 Oct →
ancient4–130.0114%25 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0122%25 Oct →
ancient9–130.0318%25 Oct →
cache11–130.0321%23 Oct →
anubis13–2-0.0320%23 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0426%23 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0016%23 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0218%20 Oct →
mirage4–130.1623%18 Oct →
mirage10–130.0529%18 Oct →
dust210–130.0627%18 Oct →
dust213–90.109%18 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.060%18 Oct →
inferno15–150.0123%18 Oct →
nuke13–60.0120%18 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0014%16 Oct →
dust213–70.0211%16 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0419%13 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.035%13 Oct →
nuke13–100.0126%12 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0717%12 Oct →
dust210–130.0324%1 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0222%1 Oct →
inferno13–50.1136%30 Sept →
mirage12–120.1033%30 Sept →
nuke13–70.1427%30 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0020%30 Sept →
nuke16–130.0933%29 Sept →
dust213–100.0740%29 Sept →
dust213–80.0820%29 Sept →
nuke13–50.0910%28 Sept →
mirage13–60.077%28 Sept →
ancient13–100.0418%27 Sept →
inferno13–40.0524%27 Sept →
dust213–90.0320%26 Sept →
dust213–90.0914%26 Sept →
cache11–130.0119%26 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0322%26 Sept →
ancient13–90.0525%26 Sept →
dust213–80.0114%25 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0631%25 Sept →
inferno9–130.0020%25 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.020%25 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0560%25 Sept →
dust213–100.0733%24 Sept →
dust28–130.0141%24 Sept →
mirage13–40.0818%21 Sept →
dust213–40.0024%21 Sept →
dust27–130.0527%21 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0132%20 Sept →
mirage13–40.0623%19 Sept →
nuke11–130.1227%19 Sept →
ancient13–40.1337%19 Sept →
inferno13–40.0621%19 Sept →
dust24–9-0.1141%19 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0227%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.0130%17 Sept →
dust213–70.0628%17 Sept →
dust213–50.0927%17 Sept →
nuke12–120.1926%16 Sept →
inferno13–30.0125%16 Sept →
dust213–40.0314%15 Sept →
mirage4–130.0119%10 Sept →
ancient13–60.0913%10 Sept →
anubis13–30.0320%10 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0330%10 Sept →
dust213–20.1123%9 Sept →
cache12–50.1721%9 Sept →
dust213–70.1333%9 Sept →
nuke13–10.0118%9 Sept →
dust213–110.2331%9 Sept →
nuke13–90.1123%9 Sept →
mirage13–40.0920%9 Sept →
dust213–100.0218%9 Sept →
nuke13–100.0423%9 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0221%9 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0112%9 Sept →
inferno2–6-0.1217%8 Sept →
dust213–50.0132%8 Sept →
cache13–100.0337%8 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0115%8 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0317%8 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0114%8 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0426%8 Sept →
dust213–110.1115%8 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0319%7 Sept →
nuke12–160.0332%7 Sept →
ancient13–10.0214%7 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0430%7 Sept →
dust211–30.1020%7 Sept →
dust212–120.0521%7 Sept →
nuke5–130.0011%6 Sept →
anubis13–160.0016%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.