Branco

Branco — CS2 Stats

76561198154480341[U:1:194214613]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

837Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,872Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,122 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 62 days played since 18 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,040 -2,619 1 Mar28 Jun · 10 days played
10,58914,954peak 14,9541 Mar28 Jun
14,954Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,122Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
62Days played since 2025-12-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,122
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 79 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,045), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate38.9%43.8%44.8%5.9% short
Shot accuracy16.1%12.0%12.5%above
Kill/death ratio0.861.021.030.18 short
Match win rate35.3%44.7%45.2%9.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBrancoFACEITLevel 5 · 1,122 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,122csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning38
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41545Last 10041%Win rateLWWLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility5.1
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning3.8
Utility5.1
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time641ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 18 Jul
56%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 10 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · nuke, 24 Apr
13–3Biggest win · cache, 7 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 55% over 11infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC40152538%-0.03
nukeC24101442%-0.03
mirageA116555%-0.01
infernoD71614%-0.05
overpassC52340%-0.04
dust242250%-0.04
anubis41325%-0.04
ancient330100%0.01
vertigo110100%0.03
office1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,270Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
5,011Matches
35.3%Match win rate
38.9%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
8,863MVPs
2,872Hours (in match)
2,727Bombs planted
674Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,386
AWP8,073
Knife2,428
P902,295
SG 5531,915
AUG1,464

Lifetime map wins

4,993nuke
4,213inferno
2,670dust2
1,521vertigo
770cbble
697train
138lake
94office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

728Matches
52%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
65.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis6060%0.9013.0
Vertigo3152%0.7412.4
Inferno2846%0.8012.1
Nuke1963%0.7411.7
Mirage1354%0.6711.6
Train1258%0.7011.0
Ancient1127%0.5911.9
Overpass650%0.9712.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
635msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
43.1%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
6.64HE damage / grenade
10.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4571 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7827% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–13-0.0525%13 Sept
mirage13–90.0224%13 Sept
mirage5–10.0430%13 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0513%10 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0227%10 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0520%10 Sept
cache8–130.0413%29 Aug
cache2–13-0.0518%28 Aug
cache9–13-0.0615%27 Aug
vertigo13–90.0315%10 Aug
dust213–60.0056%10 Aug
cache3–13-0.0438%1 Aug
cache13–60.0913%18 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0919%16 Jul
cache6–130.0320%14 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0424%12 Jul
nuke16–140.0213%28 Jun
cache13–4-0.0519%28 Jun
cache13–4-0.0310%27 Jun
cache13–8-0.0323%27 Jun
nuke10–13-0.079%21 Jun
cache12–12-0.0522%21 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0019%20 Jun
dust24–13-0.0925%19 Jun
cache13–6-0.0112%19 Jun
cache13–9-0.0513%19 Jun
cache6–13-0.0322%16 Jun
inferno7–13-0.090%14 Jun
cache7–13-0.020%13 Jun
cache10–13-0.0514%12 Jun
cache13–3-0.066%7 Jun
cache7–13-0.0827%7 Jun
cache13–110.0217%6 Jun
cache12–12-0.0117%6 Jun
cache13–6-0.0215%6 Jun
cache9–13-0.0832%5 Jun
cache13–4-0.0429%5 Jun
cache6–13-0.0435%5 Jun
cache10–13-0.0114%31 May
cache12–12-0.0511%29 May
cache11–130.0219%25 May
cache5–13-0.0610%22 May
cache12–12-0.0527%22 May
cache5–13-0.0215%22 May
cache8–13-0.0310%22 May
cache3–13-0.0320%22 May
cache13–60.0424%22 May
cache11–13-0.0413%16 May
cache6–13-0.0633%15 May
cache13–40.0021%15 May
cache13–10-0.077%15 May
cache9–13-0.0120%2 May
cache13–5-0.0242%30 Apr
cache6–13-0.0123%30 Apr
cache13–3-0.0211%30 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0615%25 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0426%24 Apr
nuke13–60.0429%24 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0615%3 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0523%28 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0317%28 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0411%21 Mar
inferno7–13-0.048%14 Mar
dust213–11-0.0412%14 Mar
overpass13–7-0.0413%14 Mar
nuke8–130.0119%8 Mar
mirage13–80.0819%4 Mar
anubis2–13-0.110%4 Mar
nuke13–11-0.058%1 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0016%28 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0424%28 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0413%27 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0618%27 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0723%26 Feb
nuke5–13-0.1018%21 Feb
nuke8–130.0221%21 Feb
nuke5–13-0.108%20 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0412%15 Feb
dust29–13-0.0217%15 Feb
nuke1–10-0.060%8 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0419%6 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0832%1 Feb
ancient13–11-0.057%1 Feb
overpass13–110.0211%31 Jan
office9–13-0.0133%30 Jan
nuke13–100.0221%30 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0228%29 Jan
ancient13–60.0620%28 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0312%28 Jan
anubis13–40.0317%27 Jan
ancient13–100.0322%27 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0124%27 Jan
nuke13–80.0325%24 Jan
nuke13–80.0127%23 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0320%21 Jan
nuke3–13-0.0221%17 Jan
nuke16–120.038%10 Jan
nuke5–13-0.1015%2 Jan
nuke5–13-0.080%21 Dec
nuke12–120.0114%18 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →