meLLe

meLLe — CS2 Stats

DK76561198079177702[U:1:118911974]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

495Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,658Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.1%46.8%48.3%5.2% short
Shot accuracy17.6%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.271.061.07above
Match win rate48.4%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmeLLeFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning54
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY33386Last 7743%Win rateLWWWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 691ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 651ms

Newest first, from the last 77 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.5
Utility6.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact0.2

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time631ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−4.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 77 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–10 · cache, 16 Jun
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 2 May
406msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · nuke, 25 Feb
13–3Biggest win · cache, 9 Jun

Across the last 77 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 47% over 43infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB43202347%0.01
infernoD72529%-0.01
anubisC52340%-0.00
dust2C52340%-0.01
mirage4040%-0.02
vertigo42250%-0.01
ancient31233%-0.02
nuke32167%0.01
overpass32167%-0.01

Across the last 77 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,142Lifetime kills
1.27K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
3,518Matches
48.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
43.1%Headshot %
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
9,608MVPs
1,658Hours (in match)
2,712Bombs planted
603Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,955
AWP5,275
Molotov2,243
P2501,968
P901,878

Lifetime map wins

4,040nuke
3,090inferno
1,633dust2
1,323vertigo
367train
241cbble
142lake
69office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

456Matches
53%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
79.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo3456%1.2218.6
Anubis3361%1.2517.1
Inferno3063%1.1217.4
Ancient1443%1.0915.9
Train650%0.9216.2
Nuke617%0.8013.3
Mirage30%0.6711.0
Dust210%2.5030.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
627msReaction time
31.3%T opening success
63.7%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
9.92HE damage / grenade
6.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.3205% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–130.0618%9 Aug
cache13–60.0218%24 Jul
cache13–10-0.0615%22 Jul
cache13–80.0312%19 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0710%19 Jul
cache13–6-0.0514%18 Jul
cache13–110.0315%17 Jul
cache6–130.0217%14 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0115%12 Jul
ancient12–16-0.059%11 Jul
nuke13–70.0413%9 Jul
anubis7–130.0419%9 Jul
cache11–13-0.0716%8 Jul
cache5–13-0.0217%8 Jul
cache11–130.0713%2 Jul
cache13–90.0522%30 Jun
dust23–130.0014%30 Jun
cache4–13-0.049%29 Jun
cache12–120.0415%25 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0113%21 Jun
cache12–120.0111%21 Jun
cache4–13-0.0119%20 Jun
cache8–13-0.0517%20 Jun
overpass13–60.0315%20 Jun
cache13–9-0.0319%19 Jun
cache9–130.0122%18 Jun
vertigo7–9-0.0414%17 Jun
inferno7–9-0.040%17 Jun
cache6–130.0213%17 Jun
cache13–70.0620%17 Jun
cache10–13-0.0312%16 Jun
cache6–13-0.0714%16 Jun
cache13–40.0517%16 Jun
cache13–100.0825%16 Jun
cache12–12-0.0119%15 Jun
cache12–120.0625%14 Jun
cache13–40.0617%14 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0210%14 Jun
cache13–10-0.007%14 Jun
cache13–100.0121%13 Jun
cache11–13-0.070%13 Jun
cache12–120.039%13 Jun
cache13–60.0713%12 Jun
cache13–110.0114%12 Jun
cache10–130.0116%11 Jun
cache13–9-0.0027%11 Jun
cache6–13-0.0120%11 Jun
cache13–3-0.029%9 Jun
cache9–13-0.0218%18 May
cache12–120.018%10 May
cache11–13-0.0114%9 May
cache13–60.0517%9 May
cache13–70.0432%2 May
cache13–50.0720%30 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0518%14 Mar
dust213–11-0.0721%14 Mar
anubis13–8-0.037%13 Mar
overpass5–13-0.048%27 Feb
dust210–13-0.0216%20 Feb
dust29–13-0.0332%15 Feb
inferno13–90.0022%2 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0219%31 Jan
mirage10–130.0421%13 Nov
inferno10–60.0530%29 Oct
ancient6–13-0.0010%9 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0519%4 May
inferno9–130.0318%25 Apr
dust26–20.0815%13 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0315%13 Apr
inferno7–8-0.0115%1 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0123%25 Feb
anubis13–90.0030%22 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0121%14 Feb
anubis14–16-0.0011%12 Jan
vertigo6–13-0.0025%10 Jan
vertigo13–110.0320%6 Jan
vertigo13–11-0.0226%4 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →