ty — CS2 Stats

76561198150963920[U:1:190698192]

1,181Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,339Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,698Top 25% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#45236 of 251154 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,698 -524 8 Apr – 29 Sept · 24 days played
19,70524,538peak 24,5388 Apr29 Sept
24,912Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2026-04-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,840 below peak (24,538)
  • +2,993 over 30 days · improving
  • +537 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,302 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-25
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate34.9%44.8%45.7%10.8% short
Shot accuracy14.4%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.141.031.05above
Match win rate50.0%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtyFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,698 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning61
Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–49–5Last 10046%Win rateLLLLWWLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility7.8
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.0

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.1
Utility7.8
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time588ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 11 Sept →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 6–11 · mirage, 2 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 7 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 52% over 23mirageWeakest map · 43% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2310–1343%0.01
infernoB2312–1152%0.00
cacheC219–1243%0.01
nukeB157–847%0.01
dust2C73–443%0.04
ancient—42–250%-0.01
overpass—32–167%-0.02
anubis—20–20%-0.07
vertigo—11–0100%0.06
poseidon—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 23). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

136,625Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
6,011Matches
50.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
34.9%Headshot %
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
24,863MVPs
2,339Hours (in match)
9,558Bombs planted
4,783Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,347
AWP15,374
P908,931
Knife5,395
P2503,826
Tec-93,037

Lifetime map wins

11,393dust2
10,328inferno
3,082train
2,715nuke
1,333cbble
1,244vertigo
146lake
114safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
589msReaction time
51.5%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
15.41HE damage / grenade
14.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.0117%8 Oct →
mirage6–11-0.0337%2 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.046%2 Oct →
dust28–130.0813%2 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.029%2 Oct →
mirage13–100.0012%29 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.064%26 Sept →
ancient16–130.0114%26 Sept →
dust213–60.0525%24 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0216%24 Sept →
mirage11–130.0119%22 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0114%22 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0820%18 Sept →
cache16–140.0120%15 Sept →
inferno13–80.0713%15 Sept →
cache14–160.0120%14 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0420%14 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0319%11 Sept →
mirage13–40.1220%11 Sept →
inferno13–80.0322%8 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0622%8 Sept →
nuke13–80.0613%8 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0312%7 Sept →
inferno9–130.0426%5 Sept →
cache11–130.1115%5 Sept →
cache13–50.0112%3 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.035%3 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.049%3 Sept →
mirage16–130.0320%3 Sept →
mirage9–130.0618%3 Sept →
mirage8–130.0623%3 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.034%3 Sept →
inferno13–30.0414%3 Sept →
nuke13–20.0312%2 Sept →
mirage13–60.1119%2 Sept →
nuke13–100.0220%2 Sept →
cache13–70.0315%31 Aug →
dust213–110.0211%31 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0411%31 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.1813%31 Aug →
inferno13–100.0813%31 Aug →
nuke9–130.018%30 Aug →
inferno13–70.0726%30 Aug →
inferno10–130.0716%28 Aug →
mirage13–90.0824%28 Aug →
mirage13–80.0826%28 Aug →
nuke13–20.038%28 Aug →
cache13–90.0317%20 Aug →
mirage13–60.0215%12 Aug →
nuke8–130.0616%12 Aug →
mirage10–130.0013%21 Jul →
inferno13–50.0017%21 Jul →
cache10–130.0116%16 Jul →
vertigo9–30.0614%16 Jul →
inferno5–9-0.0819%16 Jul →
nuke9–30.105%16 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0629%8 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0811%8 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0415%6 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0610%29 Jun →
nuke13–50.0011%29 Jun →
cache13–100.0912%27 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0419%27 Jun →
cache4–13-0.0330%27 Jun →
overpass15–15-0.037%27 Jun →
poseidon5–9-0.0622%24 Jun →
inferno9–7-0.0124%24 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.078%22 Jun →
dust213–70.009%20 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0511%20 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0118%16 Jun →
cache13–90.0210%16 Jun →
inferno3–13-0.0627%16 Jun →
mirage12–120.0124%8 Jun →
inferno13–40.0925%8 Jun →
nuke11–130.0117%8 Jun →
cache13–90.0123%7 Jun →
cache12–120.0926%7 Jun →
anubis4–13-0.0818%1 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0729%1 Jun →
mirage10–130.0122%28 May →
cache10–130.0920%28 May →
cache3–13-0.117%13 May →
ancient4–13-0.0125%13 May →
cache13–80.0421%12 May →
dust25–130.0422%11 May →
cache9–130.0125%7 May →
inferno9–130.0921%24 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.0112%24 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0413%24 Apr →
inferno3–130.0116%24 Apr →
dust212–120.0826%23 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.1012%17 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0220%17 Apr →
nuke13–80.0016%17 Apr →
inferno16–140.0124%15 Apr →
inferno13–6-0.0115%15 Apr →
mirage13–60.0510%15 Apr →
overpass13–90.0013%14 Apr →
overpass13–7-0.0317%8 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.