limmy^ — CS2 Stats

76561198342541800[U:1:382276072]

2,205Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating21,365Top 50% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#62628 of 251154 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−1090Premier CS Rating · 22,455 → 21,365

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,365 +3,769 20 Aug – 9 Oct · 31 days played
17,34923,541peak 23,54120 Aug9 Oct
23,541Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-07-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,176 below peak (23,541)
  • +852 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,635 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlimmy^FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,365 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning64
Utility81

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLLLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +55ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility8.1
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels2.7

Sharp aimerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 81 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.4
Utility8.1
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time557ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 2 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · cache, 7 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · cache, 3 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L6Current streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 21dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2114–767%-0.00
infernoA1911–858%0.02
nukeC198–1142%0.01
cacheC167–944%-0.01
anubisC94–544%-0.02
dust2D72–529%-0.01
ancientC52–340%0.03
train—11–0100%-0.00
vertigo—10–10%0.08
office—10–10%-0.07
overpass—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

565Matches
54%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
—ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno540%1.2819.0
Anubis540%1.1216.8
Ancient40%0.9817.8
Mirage333%1.1819.7
Overpass333%1.0317.0
Vertigo20%0.8417.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
87.9%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
545msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
46.8%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
15.74HE damage / grenade
17.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.3361% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–130.0025%9 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0124%9 Oct →
dust24–130.0031%9 Oct →
dust23–13-0.140%8 Oct →
cache8–130.0336%7 Oct →
inferno8–130.0324%6 Oct →
mirage13–50.0114%6 Oct →
train13–9-0.0015%5 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.1417%5 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0718%5 Oct →
inferno13–70.0019%5 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0220%3 Oct →
mirage13–100.0321%29 Sept →
dust23–130.0113%29 Sept →
inferno13–80.0120%29 Sept →
cache4–80.0421%28 Sept →
nuke3–2-0.059%28 Sept →
inferno16–140.0631%28 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.0619%28 Sept →
anubis10–130.0215%26 Sept →
ancient16–130.0419%26 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0128%25 Sept →
nuke13–50.0326%25 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0823%24 Sept →
dust213–60.0329%24 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0131%24 Sept →
anubis13–100.0327%24 Sept →
inferno13–60.0321%24 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0323%22 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0721%22 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0210%20 Sept →
mirage3–130.0036%18 Sept →
nuke13–70.0022%17 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0628%16 Sept →
cache16–140.0120%15 Sept →
inferno13–80.0420%15 Sept →
office1–13-0.0711%14 Sept →
mirage13–90.0920%14 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0421%14 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0227%14 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0226%11 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0616%10 Sept →
nuke13–20.0419%10 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0014%9 Sept →
cache13–60.0624%9 Sept →
inferno13–30.159%9 Sept →
mirage3–130.0117%9 Sept →
mirage13–70.0322%8 Sept →
inferno13–80.0110%8 Sept →
nuke8–130.0223%8 Sept →
nuke13–80.094%8 Sept →
inferno13–80.0821%7 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0319%7 Sept →
anubis13–100.0218%7 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0140%7 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0025%5 Sept →
cache11–130.0421%5 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0320%3 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0311%3 Sept →
inferno7–130.0218%3 Sept →
mirage16–130.0319%3 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0412%3 Sept →
ancient6–130.0320%3 Sept →
inferno13–30.0516%3 Sept →
nuke13–20.1633%2 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0221%2 Sept →
nuke13–100.0124%2 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0124%1 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0230%1 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.2014%31 Aug →
inferno13–100.0516%31 Aug →
nuke9–130.1026%30 Aug →
inferno13–70.0215%30 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0021%28 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0318%28 Aug →
mirage13–80.0123%28 Aug →
nuke13–20.0818%28 Aug →
mirage16–12-0.0322%27 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0210%26 Aug →
mirage13–20.0617%26 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0127%20 Aug →
ancient11–130.0224%18 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0136%13 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0317%13 Aug →
ancient13–30.0818%12 Aug →
anubis13–40.0115%12 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0220%12 Aug →
mirage13–60.1126%12 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0428%12 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0512%5 Aug →
dust20–50.0222%5 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0810%4 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.029%4 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.0133%3 Aug →
cache13–70.0727%24 Jul →
dust216–140.0029%23 Jul →
overpass9–30.0119%23 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0725%22 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0919%22 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0125%21 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.