Roggan

Roggan — CS2 Stats

FI76561198150823590[U:1:190557862]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,452Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,581Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#88074 of 251978 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,627 -1,972 25 Mar – 5 Jul · 3 days played
19,62722,013peak 22,01325 Mar5 Jul
22,013Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-03-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,030), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate60.4%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy14.4%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.431.061.07above
Match win rate40.9%46.3%46.9%6.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRogganFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning56
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–32–6Last 10062%Win rateWWWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −5.8pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.6
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time567ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–5 · nuke, 9 Apr →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · mirage, 30 Sept →
367msFastest reaction time · 10–3 · nuke, 5 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 10 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 88% over 17anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA3722–1559%-0.00
mirageA3118–1358%-0.01
dust2S1715–288%-0.00
anubisD51–420%0.01
nuke—43–175%0.02
ancient—21–150%-0.00
overpass—21–150%-0.01
inferno—21–150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

237,341Lifetime kills
1.43K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
6,726Matches
40.9%Match win rate
60.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
13,017MVPs
7,581Hours (in match)
3,899Bombs planted
1,501Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4798,057
AWP29,585
SSG 083,144
AUG2,713
SG 5532,615

Lifetime map wins

5,800inferno
4,663dust2
2,881train
1,613nuke
1,005vertigo
430lake
413cbble
366safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

630Matches
53%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
69.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6455%1.1614.6
Anubis2454%1.1314.0
Nuke2055%1.3416.8
Dust21471%1.1912.2
Overpass1050%1.0016.8
Cache450%0.9612.0
Vertigo30%0.557.7
Ancient20%0.8615.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
551msReaction time
51.9%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
7.61HE damage / grenade
3.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.7276 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.6014% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–8-0.0124%14 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0118%13 Oct →
dust213–30.0616%13 Oct →
cache7–13-0.076%12 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0110%12 Oct →
mirage10–130.0114%9 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0114%9 Oct →
mirage13–20.0219%8 Oct →
cache13–7-0.007%8 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0930%7 Oct →
anubis10–130.0322%6 Oct →
dust213–80.0222%6 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0121%5 Oct →
mirage13–90.0331%5 Oct →
dust213–20.0218%4 Oct →
mirage13–90.0214%4 Oct →
ancient13–30.0126%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0119%1 Oct →
anubis8–130.0214%1 Oct →
cache13–30.0530%1 Oct →
mirage0–3-0.0167%30 Sept →
mirage6–130.0631%30 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0121%29 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0933%29 Sept →
cache13–30.0123%29 Sept →
cache4–00.0029%29 Sept →
nuke9–7-0.0832%20 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0819%18 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0512%18 Sept →
mirage13–50.0323%18 Sept →
dust213–60.0537%22 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0619%22 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0417%17 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0011%17 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.0221%2 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0126%31 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0322%31 Jul →
cache2–130.0232%31 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0113%28 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0128%28 Jul →
overpass6–13-0.0527%15 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0527%15 Jul →
cache12–120.0425%15 Jul →
anubis12–160.0320%11 Jul →
cache13–90.0016%11 Jul →
cache13–90.0625%11 Jul →
cache11–130.0218%10 Jul →
cache13–00.1116%10 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.038%10 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0615%9 Jul →
cache13–50.0216%9 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0224%9 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0312%8 Jul →
mirage13–110.0113%8 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0417%8 Jul →
nuke10–30.1121%5 Jul →
mirage11–130.0220%5 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0829%5 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0031%2 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0816%2 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0415%1 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0027%1 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0612%1 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0511%30 Jun →
cache13–60.0111%18 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0614%18 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0119%10 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0514%10 Jun →
cache13–4-0.0116%10 Jun →
dust213–10.0627%10 Jun →
inferno13–70.0411%10 Jun →
cache13–5-0.0223%8 Jun →
cache4–13-0.0416%8 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0815%31 May →
cache7–130.0128%31 May →
cache9–2-0.0324%31 May →
mirage8–13-0.0119%24 May →
cache13–90.0230%24 May →
mirage8–13-0.055%23 May →
cache6–13-0.0414%23 May →
cache13–10-0.0218%23 May →
cache13–60.0519%11 May →
dust213–80.0933%11 May →
cache13–10-0.0820%11 May →
cache13–80.1017%1 May →
cache13–8-0.0318%1 May →
cache11–13-0.0230%29 Apr →
anubis13–60.0115%24 Apr →
mirage13–110.0123%24 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0124%10 Apr →
overpass13–100.0219%10 Apr →
mirage13–60.0429%10 Apr →
dust25–1-0.0142%10 Apr →
mirage13–80.0330%10 Apr →
mirage11–00.1131%10 Apr →
nuke9–50.1314%9 Apr →
anubis12–12-0.0328%3 Apr →
mirage13–80.0019%3 Apr →
mirage10–130.0131%25 Mar →
inferno5–120.0525%25 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.