The Great Xander

The Great Xander — CS2 Stats

76561198150369927[U:1:190104199]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,417Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,981Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,779Blue band · top ~29.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,779 +1,669 19 Jul – 8 Oct · 32 days played
12,01515,352peak 15,35219 Jul8 Oct
15,473Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-07-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 573 below peak (15,352)
  • +2,623 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,669 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 221 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches47——
Win rate53%——
K/D0.82——
Headshot %43%——

Measured 18 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,247), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate41.2%42.7%43.7%2.5% short
Shot accuracy15.0%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.860.991.020.16 short
Match win rate40.5%43.9%44.7%4.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGThe Great XanderFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,779 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning55
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateWWLWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +7.9pp headshot accuracy · +47ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.0
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact9.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time527ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–7 · anubis, 19 Jul →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 28 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 19 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 1 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 16infernoWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS1611–569%-0.00
cacheA169–756%-0.03
infernoD154–1127%-0.00
ancientA149–564%0.01
dust2D144–1029%-0.02
anubisC135–838%-0.00
mirageC52–340%0.00
boulder—11–0100%0.04
train—10–10%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.01
shelter—10–10%0.03
office—10–10%-0.07
poseidon—10–10%-0.07
eldorado—11–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,947Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
4,034Matches
40.5%Match win rate
41.2%Headshot %
15.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
6,334MVPs
1,472Hours (in match)
4,420Bombs planted
782Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,766
AWP3,889
UMP-451,746
MP91,648
P2501,335

Lifetime map wins

7,299dust2
4,906inferno
1,992vertigo
1,799nuke
1,219cbble
695train
218office
63safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

205Matches
45%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
74.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke580%1.2817.8
Vertigo560%0.9515.2
Dust2520%0.6010.2
Ancient520%0.8614.6
Mirage367%1.5219.0
Inferno333%0.6210.3
Anubis367%0.7813.0
Cache250%0.8813.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
71.6%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
542msReaction time
44.1%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
12.07HE damage / grenade
10.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
boulder13–100.0420%15 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0113%15 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0431%10 Oct →
dust213–100.0015%8 Oct →
ancient13–60.0613%8 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0224%7 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0718%6 Oct →
train8–130.0328%28 Sept →
dust213–20.0936%28 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0218%26 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0114%26 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0518%26 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0318%21 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0512%20 Sept →
cache13–40.0014%20 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0717%19 Sept →
ancient13–80.0012%19 Sept →
mirage13–60.008%19 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0316%19 Sept →
anubis13–40.008%18 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0318%18 Sept →
inferno15–150.0421%16 Sept →
ancient13–100.0412%14 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0311%13 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0311%13 Sept →
nuke13–80.0614%13 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0114%7 Sept →
dust21–2-0.120%7 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.044%7 Sept →
ancient13–100.0112%7 Sept →
mirage7–10.097%7 Sept →
cache16–12-0.0224%7 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0111%7 Sept →
dust22–13-0.025%6 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0220%4 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.005%4 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.080%27 Aug →
mirage9–130.0210%27 Aug →
dust213–70.0527%27 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0611%27 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0418%26 Aug →
dust27–130.0921%23 Aug →
inferno5–130.0013%20 Aug →
ancient0–20.0833%20 Aug →
inferno11–130.0322%19 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0510%19 Aug →
inferno8–130.0217%16 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0814%15 Aug →
anubis11–130.0113%15 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0620%15 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0215%15 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0118%15 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0625%14 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0326%14 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0113%12 Aug →
ancient16–140.0533%12 Aug →
nuke13–50.1121%11 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0514%11 Aug →
inferno8–80.0016%11 Aug →
vertigo9–50.0135%11 Aug →
nuke9–7-0.0224%10 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0029%8 Aug →
anubis13–60.0231%8 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0129%8 Aug →
shelter7–130.0326%4 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0620%4 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0617%4 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0713%3 Aug →
office10–13-0.0729%2 Aug →
cache13–90.0315%2 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0410%2 Aug →
poseidon6–9-0.0728%1 Aug →
eldorado9–60.0010%1 Aug →
nuke8–8-0.1216%1 Aug →
nuke13–100.0417%1 Aug →
cache13–70.0620%1 Aug →
nuke13–50.0728%1 Aug →
inferno13–10.1027%1 Aug →
cache3–13-0.1129%1 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0724%26 Jul →
cache7–13-0.020%24 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0419%24 Jul →
ancient10–130.0115%24 Jul →
nuke13–70.0514%22 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0110%22 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0619%22 Jul →
ancient13–90.0122%22 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0414%21 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0231%20 Jul →
inferno13–80.0535%20 Jul →
nuke13–90.0327%20 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0014%20 Jul →
nuke13–80.0320%19 Jul →
anubis13–70.1113%19 Jul →
nuke0–3-0.090%19 Jul →
cache8–13-0.1018%19 Jul →
ancient14–16-0.0116%18 Jul →
anubis13–30.0816%18 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.066%18 Jul →
anubis15–150.0414%16 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.