HUNDIS

HUNDIS — CS2 Stats

SE76561198149793462[U:1:189527734]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,663Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
4,537Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,833 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,833 → 1,833
+4Tracked matches · now 5,663
−1.6ppWin rate · 53.3% → 51.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 70 days played since 2 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,280 -116 2 Apr3 Apr · 2 days played
17,28017,396peak 17,3962 Apr3 Apr
17,519Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,833Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
70Days played since 2026-02-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,833
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 168 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-21
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=28,192), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate46.4%51.0%
Shot accuracy7.3%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.751.09
Match win rate49.4%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHUNDISFACEITLevel 10 · 1,833 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,833csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning54
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46531Last 10046%Win rateTLWLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.4
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time571ms−152ms
first ⅓ avg 722ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 10–1 · shelter, 11 Jul
60%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 3 Mar
375msFastest reaction time · 10–1 · shelter, 11 Jul
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 18 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC32131941%-0.01
dust2D134931%-0.02
nukeS139469%-0.01
ancientA127558%-0.02
infernoB84450%-0.01
anubisD61517%-0.03
vertigoC52340%-0.00
overpassD51420%-0.05
shelter32167%0.04
italy110100%-0.02
sanctum110100%-0.08
tuscan_d110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

142,358Lifetime kills
0.75K/D
8,513Matches
49.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
46.4%Headshot %
7.3%Shot accuracy
15,968MVPs
4,537Hours (in match)
6,720Bombs planted
2,581Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4754,026
AWP8,395
Knife5,135
MP94,397
MAC-104,133

Lifetime map wins

14,590inferno
12,521dust2
10,486vertigo
4,730nuke
2,013train
334italy
243cbble
185office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,459Matches
49%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
70.1ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage87350%0.9514.6
Ancient67453%0.9715.1
Dust255046%0.8813.8
Anubis35651%0.9214.5
Inferno33948%0.9014.2
Nuke17545%0.9013.7
Train12945%0.8714.1
Overpass11456%0.9414.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
551msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
51.0%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
5.46HE damage / grenade
10.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.46 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4093% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo12–12-0.0515%23 Sept
dust28–13-0.0118%15 Sept
mirage16–130.0122%29 Aug
dust28–13-0.0316%28 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0111%27 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0036%27 Aug
vertigo13–80.0420%26 Aug
nuke13–80.0125%26 Aug
anubis5–130.0532%14 Aug
ancient19–170.0322%13 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0423%10 Aug
nuke13–60.0220%7 Aug
mirage8–130.0131%4 Aug
mirage13–80.0019%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.0425%30 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0019%30 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0415%29 Jul
dust27–13-0.0133%28 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0628%28 Jul
italy13–4-0.0213%27 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0325%27 Jul
mirage13–40.0215%14 Jul
dust216–13-0.0135%13 Jul
shelter13–40.1140%11 Jul
shelter10–10.1116%11 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0418%10 Jul
nuke13–70.0632%10 Jul
shelter7–13-0.084%10 Jul
ancient12–160.0125%8 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0817%8 Jul
dust213–70.0229%6 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0615%1 Jul
overpass4–13-0.0825%1 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0919%26 Jun
inferno13–100.0133%26 Jun
inferno13–100.0723%24 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0028%23 Jun
mirage13–100.0931%22 Jun
mirage13–80.0237%22 Jun
ancient19–15-0.0314%22 Jun
dust213–60.0529%19 Jun
mirage4–130.0329%19 Jun
nuke13–10.0328%18 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0023%18 Jun
anubis19–22-0.0428%17 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0223%14 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0137%14 Jun
mirage13–160.0127%7 Jun
mirage13–40.0329%29 May
mirage3–13-0.0615%20 May
anubis13–10-0.0820%17 May
nuke1–13-0.0433%8 May
mirage10–13-0.0343%24 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0018%22 Apr
dust24–13-0.0230%21 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0722%20 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0221%19 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0021%18 Apr
ancient13–3-0.0319%18 Apr
mirage8–130.0225%3 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0733%2 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0219%2 Apr
inferno6–130.0320%27 Mar
vertigo6–130.0419%21 Mar
mirage13–10-0.078%20 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0315%19 Mar
dust210–13-0.0021%18 Mar
ancient13–80.0111%18 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0814%18 Mar
dust213–7-0.0424%18 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0638%17 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0233%17 Mar
mirage4–130.0319%11 Mar
sanctum9–7-0.0829%11 Mar
anubis13–16-0.0116%9 Mar
mirage13–80.0224%9 Mar
mirage13–70.0942%9 Mar
mirage15–19-0.0423%7 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0711%7 Mar
dust28–13-0.0232%6 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0720%5 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0228%4 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0560%3 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0126%2 Mar
tuscan_d13–10-0.0618%2 Mar
vertigo9–13-0.0221%2 Mar
dust20–13-0.0515%1 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0016%1 Mar
anubis13–16-0.0316%27 Feb
nuke16–13-0.0115%24 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0227%23 Feb
vertigo13–9-0.0324%22 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0823%16 Feb
nuke13–80.0832%12 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0128%11 Feb
dust29–13-0.065%11 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0314%5 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0521%4 Feb
overpass16–190.0026%3 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0329%2 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →