Isoo Basso

Isoo Basso — CS2 Stats

76561198149096565[U:1:188830837]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,270Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,320Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53065 of 261669 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,677 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,320 +3,024 2 Sept – 14 Nov · 18 days played
19,29623,226peak 23,2262 Sept14 Nov
23,622Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,974Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • 297 below peak (1,974)
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 74 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 906 below peak (23,226)
  • +443 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,680 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIsoo BassoFACEITLevel 9 · 1,677 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,320 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,974csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning59
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateLWLLLWWTTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.9pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 6–12–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch2.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact2.6

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time535ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 6 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–9 · cache, 7 Nov →
391msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 13 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 6 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 61% over 23anubisWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2314–961%0.02
mirageC2310–1343%-0.02
nukeB147–750%-0.01
anubisC125–742%0.02
ancientC125–742%0.01
cacheB115–645%-0.00
inferno—32–167%-0.01
overpass—21–150%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

681Matches
51%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
82.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5956%1.0915.9
Dust23762%1.0614.9
Nuke2948%1.3318.2
Ancient2868%1.2016.9
Anubis2462%1.0715.3
Cache1729%0.8113.8
Inferno1450%0.8913.1
Train650%1.1115.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
539msReaction time
58.1%T opening success
48.9%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
8.82HE damage / grenade
6.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0626%14 Nov →
dust213–90.0827%14 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.0218%13 Nov →
nuke11–13-0.0512%13 Nov →
dust28–130.0417%13 Nov →
cache13–60.0612%13 Nov →
ancient13–100.029%13 Nov →
nuke15–150.0211%13 Nov →
nuke15–15-0.0421%13 Nov →
mirage13–9-0.008%10 Nov →
anubis1–13-0.0322%10 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.0213%7 Nov →
mirage13–110.1021%7 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.0311%7 Nov →
mirage14–16-0.0917%7 Nov →
ancient13–16-0.0217%7 Nov →
cache0–9-0.1050%7 Nov →
anubis13–20.0421%31 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0314%31 Oct →
ancient15–190.1024%30 Oct →
overpass6–130.0223%30 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.017%30 Oct →
dust210–130.0814%30 Oct →
overpass13–10-0.0121%30 Oct →
dust213–80.0111%25 Oct →
mirage13–100.0024%25 Oct →
ancient14–160.018%24 Oct →
cache13–100.0313%24 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0114%24 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0225%24 Oct →
dust213–70.0311%24 Oct →
mirage13–100.0210%23 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0418%23 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0421%23 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0110%23 Oct →
inferno13–100.0319%23 Oct →
anubis13–80.0320%23 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0417%23 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0120%23 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0820%18 Oct →
anubis13–50.1121%18 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0313%18 Oct →
dust213–60.0517%18 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0132%17 Oct →
mirage13–100.0422%17 Oct →
mirage13–90.019%17 Oct →
dust21–13-0.059%16 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0211%15 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0228%15 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0310%9 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0123%8 Oct →
inferno13–20.0317%8 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0222%8 Oct →
anubis8–130.0914%8 Oct →
dust29–130.0212%7 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0015%7 Oct →
cache13–90.0418%7 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0515%7 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.019%7 Oct →
ancient13–110.0216%7 Oct →
dust213–80.0524%6 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0317%6 Oct →
anubis13–10.0715%6 Oct →
cache13–30.1320%6 Oct →
dust216–120.0121%6 Oct →
dust213–60.0525%6 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0315%6 Oct →
nuke13–80.0827%6 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0213%6 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0820%6 Oct →
dust213–10.0215%5 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.075%4 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0317%4 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0120%3 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.058%3 Oct →
dust213–30.007%3 Oct →
anubis2–130.0024%3 Oct →
ancient13–80.018%3 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0226%3 Oct →
dust213–90.0216%3 Oct →
nuke13–40.0018%3 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0114%2 Oct →
mirage13–160.1222%1 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0512%1 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0419%1 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0112%1 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0220%1 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0327%1 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0416%1 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.039%1 Oct →
ancient14–160.0523%1 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0219%30 Sept →
dust213–10-0.009%30 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0426%30 Sept →
nuke10–130.0211%28 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0422%28 Sept →
dust213–30.0914%28 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0810%28 Sept →
anubis13–100.0420%27 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0110%27 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.