᲼᲼ ᲼᲼᲼᲼ ᲼᲼

᲼᲼ ᲼᲼᲼᲼ ᲼᲼ — CS2 Stats

FI76561198144021814[U:1:183756086]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,831Tracked matches61%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,681Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate52.9%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy8.2%11.2%12.0%3.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.940.991.020.07 short
Match win rate37.9%43.9%44.7%6.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG᲼᲼ ᲼᲼᲼᲼ ᲼᲼FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning59
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–42–9Last 10049%Win rateLWWLTWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility5.8
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning5.9
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time614ms−125ms
first ⅓ avg 739ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–13 · train, 10 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 1 Nov →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · office, 29 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 10 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB2513–1252%-0.02
mirageB147–750%-0.03
officeB137–654%-0.03
vertigoC125–742%-0.02
dust2D93–633%0.02
anubisB84–450%-0.00
nukeS75–271%-0.03
trainC52–340%0.02
inferno—21–150%-0.03
italy—10–10%-0.01
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.04
boulder—11–0100%0.05
debris—10–10%-0.09
ancient—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,848Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
4,079Matches
37.9%Match win rate
52.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
8.2%Shot accuracy
7,196MVPs
1,470Hours (in match)
1,118Bombs planted
938Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,026dust2
2,794nuke
2,547inferno
2,072vertigo
1,361train
798office
239lake
106cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
50%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
74.0ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

19%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1540%0.7010.7
Nuke838%0.8412.8
Ancient650%1.1717.8
Dust2450%0.699.5
Inferno367%0.709.7
Overpass3100%1.1614.3
Anubis250%0.8214.0
Train1100%1.0520.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
71.9%Counter-strafing
12.3°Preaim
605msReaction time
53.1%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
10.9%Flash assists
8.39HE damage / grenade
20.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2942° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0743%1 Nov →
office13–5-0.0311%29 Oct →
office13–110.0233%29 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0419%24 Oct →
office12–12-0.0214%23 Oct →
cache13–7-0.049%23 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0121%21 Oct →
mirage9–5-0.1143%16 Oct →
dust213–50.0621%16 Oct →
vertigo9–13-0.0813%10 Oct →
train9–130.1317%10 Oct →
train13–8-0.0310%10 Oct →
mirage13–30.0514%30 Sept →
dust21–70.0136%30 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0716%26 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0613%23 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0139%23 Sept →
anubis13–50.1018%19 Sept →
anubis13–100.0021%16 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0516%15 Sept →
italy0–7-0.018%15 Sept →
dust212–120.0512%15 Sept →
office13–10-0.0215%15 Sept →
vertigo13–60.0221%9 Sept →
cache13–20.0123%9 Sept →
fachwerk13–9-0.0416%8 Sept →
office11–13-0.0420%8 Sept →
office13–8-0.0232%8 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0317%30 Aug →
cache7–13-0.1011%30 Aug →
cache9–130.0328%28 Aug →
cache13–3-0.0618%28 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0322%25 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0723%24 Aug →
vertigo8–130.0433%22 Aug →
nuke4–0-0.060%22 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0222%22 Aug →
dust29–130.0319%20 Aug →
nuke12–12-0.0315%20 Aug →
nuke13–1-0.0427%10 Aug →
boulder13–10.0520%30 Jul →
vertigo10–13-0.0316%30 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0430%22 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0113%22 Jul →
debris8–8-0.0915%22 Jul →
cache13–110.0426%9 Jul →
office13–6-0.0314%9 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0421%9 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0223%9 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0818%9 Jul →
mirage13–100.0219%9 Jul →
office9–130.0221%8 Jul →
cache13–6-0.015%7 Jul →
cache10–130.0112%7 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0219%6 Jul →
dust213–70.1025%6 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0521%6 Jul →
ancient12–12-0.0813%6 Jul →
vertigo13–11-0.0910%6 Jul →
cache13–1-0.0323%6 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0630%5 Jul →
dust213–80.0014%24 Jun →
vertigo9–130.0217%24 Jun →
train13–70.0111%18 Jun →
train4–130.0211%17 Jun →
train6–13-0.0512%17 Jun →
office12–12-0.0226%16 Jun →
cache12–110.0115%16 Jun →
mirage11–60.0224%16 Jun →
anubis13–30.0718%16 Jun →
office13–5-0.0521%12 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0216%12 Jun →
nuke13–70.0324%12 Jun →
nuke9–8-0.0413%12 Jun →
vertigo13–90.0416%3 Jun →
mirage13–5-0.0919%3 Jun →
vertigo6–13-0.0728%3 Jun →
anubis1–13-0.050%28 May →
anubis4–13-0.080%28 May →
cache13–4-0.0719%22 May →
cache11–13-0.0417%22 May →
cache13–60.0110%22 May →
mirage3–13-0.0331%19 May →
cache2–13-0.0528%19 May →
office12–12-0.0220%19 May →
office7–13-0.0913%14 May →
office7–1-0.0529%14 May →
cache13–5-0.0818%11 May →
cache13–11-0.0315%11 May →
dust25–130.0133%10 May →
mirage12–12-0.0536%2 May →
cache7–13-0.0718%2 May →
cache6–13-0.0223%1 May →
vertigo13–2-0.079%29 Apr →
mirage5–20.0828%29 Apr →
cache5–13-0.0415%29 Apr →
cache13–7-0.0223%29 Apr →
cache10–13-0.0120%29 Apr →
cache12–12-0.0415%29 Apr →
cache13–90.0811%29 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.