ULTRAAA91 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198142072935[U:1:181807207]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,243Tracked matches58%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,911Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6274 of 19360 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74

Positioning53

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–46–9Last 10045%Win rateLWWWWWLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4

Aggression6.7

Utility4.5

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4

Positioning5.3

Utility4.5

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact7.6

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time636ms+2ms

first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms

Headshot accuracy19.7%−1.0%

first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — boulder 13–5

13–1Biggest win — warden

5Longest win streak

10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

boulderBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	30	15–15	50%	-0.01
dust2	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.01
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.00
inferno	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.01
nuke	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.02
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	0.00
boulder	S	6	5–1	83%	0.05
mirage	D	5	1–4	20%	0.02
overpass	—	4	4–0	100%	0.02
fachwerk	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.04
shelter	—	2	0–2	0%	0.02
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.16
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,208Matches

49%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

87.8ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

100%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	2	50%	1.07	10.5
Overpass	1	0%	0.73	19.0
Vertigo	1	0%	0.87	13.0
Anubis	1	0%	1.18	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy

36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.6%Spray accuracy

82.7%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

636msReaction time

36.8%T opening success

43.4%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

8.3%Flash assists

7.59HE damage / grenade

5.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.423 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.8345% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
fachwerk	8–13	-0.07	25%	28 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.03	28%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.03	16%	26 Aug →
boulder	13–11	0.06	27%	26 Aug →
boulder	13–5	0.15	31%	25 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.00	26%	25 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.10	12%	24 Aug →
shelter	12–12	0.02	21%	20 Aug →
fachwerk	8–13	-0.03	19%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.00	22%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.08	29%	16 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.07	15%	15 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	19%	15 Aug →
boulder	13–11	0.13	35%	14 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	8%	14 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	24%	13 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.05	26%	12 Aug →
boulder	13–7	0.02	20%	12 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.06	22%	11 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	14%	11 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	11%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	10%	6 Aug →
italy	11–13	-0.06	18%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	24%	4 Aug →
poseidon	2–9	-0.16	16%	3 Aug →
debris	8–8	0.01	9%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	18%	3 Aug →
inferno	0–8	-0.07	0%	31 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.03	11%	31 Jul →
shelter	12–12	0.03	21%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.05	15%	28 Jul →
train	2–13	-0.06	47%	27 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	-0.02	13%	27 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	20%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	21%	24 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.05	20%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	12%	23 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	18%	23 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	17%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.02	22%	22 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	6%	22 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.03	6%	21 Jul →
inferno	16–12	0.06	23%	21 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.05	13%	20 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	22%	20 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	21%	19 Jul →
boulder	13–11	-0.05	18%	19 Jul →
fachwerk	13–7	-0.03	18%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.02	17%	13 Jul →
boulder	1–7	0.00	0%	13 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	7%	6 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	25%	5 Jul →
overpass	13–10	0.02	23%	5 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.04	20%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	16%	5 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	20%	4 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	31%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	10%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.00	13%	3 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.08	20%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.12	23%	3 Jul →
train	13–6	0.09	18%	2 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.04	17%	2 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	16%	1 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	14%	1 Jul →
overpass	16–14	0.01	24%	30 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.00	14%	19 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	17%	19 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.01	9%	18 Jun →
cache	13–2	0.04	24%	18 Jun →
ancient	2–13	-0.06	12%	17 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.07	17%	17 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.02	22%	16 Jun →
cache	3–13	-0.06	9%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.06	21%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.05	21%	15 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.00	30%	13 Jun →
cache	13–6	-0.01	28%	13 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.01	10%	12 Jun →
cache	13–6	-0.03	17%	11 Jun →
nuke	5–13	0.01	12%	11 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	18%	10 Jun →
warden	13–1	0.02	15%	9 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.04	25%	9 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.01	13%	8 Jun →
cache	13–9	-0.03	19%	5 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.01	18%	5 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.01	21%	3 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.03	13%	3 Jun →
cache	5–13	-0.01	28%	1 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.00	20%	1 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.05	26%	31 May →
cache	9–13	0.01	28%	31 May →
overpass	13–8	0.02	20%	29 May →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	19%	29 May →
cache	3–13	-0.12	16%	28 May →
mirage	8–13	0.09	28%	27 May →
cache	13–11	-0.04	23%	27 May →
cache	13–8	0.02	22%	26 May →
cache	3–13	0.04	67%	22 May →