JimothyPeePeeHat

JimothyPeePeeHat — CS2 Stats

NL76561198141392531[U:1:181126803]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,842Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,398Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,668 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,668 → 1,668
+2Tracked matches · now 1,842
+3.6ppWin rate · 46.4% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,679 -4,049 9 Apr – 6 Jul · 14 days played
13,67918,009peak 18,0099 Apr6 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,668 +0 28 Aug – 21 Sept · 6 observations
1,6681,668peak 1,66828 Aug21 Sept
18,258Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,668Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-04-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,668
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 83 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches12——
Win rate58%——
K/D0.83——
Headshot %35%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,875), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate38.4%44.8%45.7%7.4% short
Shot accuracy16.6%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.931.031.050.12 short
Match win rate34.1%45.2%45.7%11.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJimothyPeePeeHatFACEITLevel 6 · 1,668 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,668csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning38
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY36–60–4Last 10036%Win rateWLWWWTLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · +47ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility6.4
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch1.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning3.8
Utility6.4
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time602ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy13.8%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 16 Jun →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · ancient, 16 Jun →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · ancient, 13 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 9 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 26nukeWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2615–1158%-0.02
infernoD186–1233%-0.04
mirageD144–1029%-0.03
overpassD132–1115%-0.04
nukeD91–811%-0.04
dust2C73–443%-0.00
cacheB63–350%-0.02
anubis—41–325%-0.03
vertigo—31–233%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

93,035Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
4,537Matches
34.1%Match win rate
38.4%Headshot %
16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
9,555MVPs
2,422Hours (in match)
2,155Bombs planted
651Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,980
AWP11,706
AUG3,399
SG 5532,743
P2502,185
MP71,931

Lifetime map wins

9,802inferno
2,385dust2
2,152nuke
1,667vertigo
445train
324office
196lake
171cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

421Matches
48%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
74.5ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient11449%0.9214.7
Inferno8851%0.8313.1
Nuke5030%0.7312.6
Overpass4858%0.9615.0
Mirage2250%0.9212.1
Vertigo2157%0.9213.7
Anubis1638%0.7613.1
Dust2520%0.7914.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.8%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.6%Spray accuracy
67.0%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
600msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
13.4%Flash assists
8.17HE damage / grenade
8.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.7917% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2376% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–50.0223%23 Sept →
overpass4–130.0418%20 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0216%15 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0412%14 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0211%13 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0113%13 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0626%8 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.038%8 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0312%6 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0610%6 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0413%20 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0210%20 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0219%19 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.106%18 Aug →
ancient19–16-0.038%18 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0611%17 Aug →
ancient13–30.038%13 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0312%12 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.068%12 Aug →
ancient13–90.0112%11 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.055%11 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.045%12 Jul →
ancient13–100.039%6 Jul →
ancient13–70.0010%21 Jun →
dust212–12-0.0414%16 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0810%16 Jun →
mirage13–100.0816%16 Jun →
ancient0–20.0267%16 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.066%13 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.039%13 Jun →
inferno2–13-0.0314%7 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0217%6 Jun →
vertigo11–13-0.0415%4 Jun →
dust213–11-0.048%31 May →
mirage12–12-0.0115%31 May →
ancient9–13-0.0014%31 May →
inferno6–13-0.0112%29 May →
vertigo3–130.019%27 May →
dust21–13-0.0417%27 May →
inferno13–16-0.0112%25 May →
overpass10–13-0.0917%25 May →
nuke13–5-0.0319%24 May →
mirage3–130.0323%24 May →
dust213–40.0316%24 May →
nuke12–12-0.0217%24 May →
mirage13–6-0.0011%24 May →
dust27–13-0.0420%24 May →
overpass11–13-0.126%24 May →
inferno13–50.0525%24 May →
mirage8–13-0.069%23 May →
ancient9–13-0.028%23 May →
ancient13–90.0511%23 May →
nuke7–13-0.0613%23 May →
ancient13–9-0.0221%23 May →
ancient8–13-0.0414%23 May →
dust213–80.0711%20 May →
inferno5–13-0.0420%19 May →
cache10–13-0.089%17 May →
inferno6–13-0.1233%12 May →
overpass6–130.0320%12 May →
ancient13–3-0.0121%11 May →
nuke11–13-0.030%9 May →
cache3–13-0.0041%9 May →
cache13–5-0.0022%30 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.086%30 Apr →
overpass3–13-0.0418%30 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.0614%30 Apr →
cache13–100.0315%29 Apr →
nuke16–19-0.048%28 Apr →
ancient15–19-0.066%28 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.026%27 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.029%26 Apr →
ancient13–90.0113%26 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0510%25 Apr →
ancient13–60.0714%24 Apr →
anubis8–130.0117%23 Apr →
overpass13–7-0.047%23 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.087%22 Apr →
ancient13–10-0.0316%21 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.0317%21 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0513%19 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0415%19 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0414%19 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0412%15 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0614%14 Apr →
overpass9–13-0.0414%14 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.056%13 Apr →
anubis6–13-0.0813%12 Apr →
overpass13–5-0.038%12 Apr →
overpass14–16-0.0317%12 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0814%12 Apr →
inferno2–13-0.0724%12 Apr →
dust213–160.0417%11 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0620%11 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.0510%11 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0918%11 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.0112%10 Apr →
inferno13–90.0316%10 Apr →
overpass6–13-0.048%9 Apr →
inferno13–2-0.068%9 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.