Leonard — CS2 Stats

76561198141174560[U:1:180908832]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,630Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.5 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,990Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#15244 of 56311 tracked

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning64

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateWWWLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression9.1

Utility6.6

Positioning6.4

Opening Duels4.5

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.4

Utility6.6

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels4.5

Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time540ms−67ms

first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms

Headshot accuracy24.4%−1.9%

first ⅓ avg 26.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — ancient 13–7

13–2Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	27	10–17	37%	0.02
nuke	A	19	11–8	58%	0.02
ancient	A	18	10–8	56%	0.05
inferno	B	15	8–7	53%	0.02
anubis	S	9	7–2	78%	0.04
cache	S	5	4–1	80%	0.05
dust2	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.01
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

281Matches

55%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

86.6ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	97	54%	1.18	17.1
Inferno	46	57%	1.36	18.5
Anubis	45	56%	1.31	17.1
Nuke	37	62%	1.31	19.2
Ancient	28	50%	1.14	16.6
Dust2	22	45%	0.96	15.7
Vertigo	2	100%	1.64	11.5
Train	2	100%	1.21	14.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy

37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

87.2%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

547msReaction time

36.3%T opening success

59.9%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

10.4%Flash assists

9.84HE damage / grenade

8.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.3054% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–6	0.08	14%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.06	19%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.02	31%	26 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.03	16%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.11	28%	25 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	22%	25 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	20%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.11	17%	25 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	24%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.09	52%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.13	32%	24 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.00	34%	24 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.06	26%	24 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	28%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.09	21%	24 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.10	33%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.10	24%	10 Aug →
mirage	12–3	0.07	18%	10 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.02	22%	10 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.02	26%	10 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	30%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.02	18%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.05	17%	5 Aug →
nuke	10–1	0.13	36%	2 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.07	27%	31 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.04	21%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	24%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.06	24%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	16%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	7%	18 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.04	19%	18 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.05	34%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.12	26%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.08	29%	18 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	18%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	30%	18 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.01	19%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	19%	15 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	15%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.06	31%	13 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.13	30%	12 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	40%	12 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.01	26%	12 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.02	20%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.08	20%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.05	24%	11 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	16%	11 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	29%	11 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	33%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	23%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	35%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	42%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.10	24%	30 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.05	16%	29 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.04	15%	29 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	4%	29 Jun →
ancient	15–15	0.03	14%	28 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.11	29%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.05	48%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.01	14%	23 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.06	27%	22 Jun →
anubis	16–12	0.06	24%	22 Jun →
ancient	3–13	0.02	23%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.12	19%	18 Jun →
inferno	16–13	0.01	35%	18 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	36%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–16	0.01	20%	16 Jun →
inferno	11–13	0.05	29%	15 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.02	29%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–5	-0.06	30%	15 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.05	23%	6 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.07	17%	6 Jun →
mirage	2–13	0.01	23%	6 Jun →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	25%	5 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.04	27%	5 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	30%	30 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	21%	30 May →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	25%	30 May →
overpass	9–13	-0.05	20%	29 May →
mirage	6–13	0.01	26%	29 May →
nuke	13–8	0.04	47%	29 May →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	14%	29 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	21%	28 May →
nuke	9–5	-0.07	17%	23 May →
inferno	9–7	0.07	50%	23 May →
poseidon	8–8	-0.04	30%	23 May →
anubis	13–6	0.04	12%	22 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	16%	22 May →
inferno	13–10	0.06	12%	22 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	16%	22 May →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	30%	22 May →
nuke	5–13	0.05	23%	22 May →
cache	13–11	0.07	29%	22 May →
nuke	10–0	0.06	33%	22 May →
mirage	2–0	0.06	100%	22 May →
ancient	10–13	0.04	20%	21 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	25%	21 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	12%	20 May →
cache	13–11	0.07	26%	20 May →
mirage	5–13	0.02	11%	20 May →