Bruno

Bruno — CS2 Stats

CH76561198139393901[U:1:179128173]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,055Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
4,043Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,278Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40641 of 260000 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,278 -2,243 11 Aug – 1 Nov · 33 days played
22,66526,906peak 26,90611 Aug1 Nov
27,136Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-08-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,628 below peak (26,906)
  • +613 over 30 days · improving
  • -2,243 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,722 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate50.8%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy13.1%13.0%13.2%meets
Kill/death ratio1.081.061.07meets
Match win rate42.0%46.3%46.9%4.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBrunoFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,278 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning48
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateWLLLLLLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +7.5pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time616ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy26.8%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 29.7% → last ⅓ avg 26.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 8–13 · vertigo, 5 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–6 · anubis, 23 Aug →
414msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · ancient, 31 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 12mirageWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2412–1250%-0.01
cacheC219–1243%-0.01
infernoA159–660%0.00
anubisS129–375%-0.01
ancientD93–633%-0.03
mirageD81–713%0.00
nukeC52–340%-0.05
vertigo—21–150%0.07
poseidon—11–0100%0.08
overpass—10–10%0.00
eldorado—11–0100%0.04
debris—11–0100%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

151,107Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
5,557Matches
42.0%Match win rate
50.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
13.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
14,993MVPs
2,596Hours (in match)
7,167Bombs planted
2,361Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,572
AWP18,861
P2502,700
Tec-92,632
Knife2,314

Lifetime map wins

12,032inferno
6,742dust2
2,159nuke
1,947vertigo
1,819train
1,064cbble
73italy
50lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

319Matches
54%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
76.5ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6659%1.2116.2
Mirage5056%1.0214.5
Anubis4945%0.9714.7
Dust23256%1.0517.3
Ancient1850%1.0315.1
Vertigo1547%1.4719.3
Overpass786%1.9919.0
Nuke650%0.8412.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.2%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.2%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
613msReaction time
29.2%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
11.77HE damage / grenade
10.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.2% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–6-0.0344%1 Nov →
nuke9–13-0.0135%31 Oct →
mirage10–130.0029%31 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0235%31 Oct →
ancient0–13-0.1217%31 Oct →
mirage10–130.0330%30 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0535%30 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0335%27 Oct →
dust210–130.0235%27 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0321%27 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0811%24 Oct →
mirage7–130.0223%24 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0313%24 Oct →
inferno13–60.0726%23 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.1133%23 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0425%23 Oct →
cache13–7-0.079%23 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0425%23 Oct →
poseidon9–50.0853%19 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0123%19 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0229%19 Oct →
overpass3–90.0022%19 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0124%15 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0229%15 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0618%14 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0127%11 Oct →
inferno13–90.0341%11 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0819%11 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0218%11 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0214%7 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0336%7 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0020%6 Oct →
dust213–80.0129%6 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0133%6 Oct →
eldorado9–70.0426%6 Oct →
debris9–5-0.0824%6 Oct →
inferno13–30.0234%3 Oct →
dust213–20.0224%3 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0124%3 Oct →
dust213–10.0640%3 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0813%2 Oct →
ancient16–130.0524%2 Oct →
inferno13–110.0131%30 Sept →
ancient10–130.0246%30 Sept →
inferno14–160.0132%29 Sept →
mirage10–130.0021%26 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0226%26 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0029%26 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0424%26 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0726%25 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0813%25 Sept →
dust211–130.0423%25 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0120%25 Sept →
cache13–50.0215%24 Sept →
mirage13–70.0519%24 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0014%24 Sept →
anubis11–130.0325%23 Sept →
cache13–70.0137%23 Sept →
inferno13–90.0118%23 Sept →
cache8–130.0440%21 Sept →
inferno13–110.0116%21 Sept →
dust29–130.0122%13 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0029%13 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0347%5 Sept →
vertigo8–130.1229%5 Sept →
anubis9–20.0316%5 Sept →
dust29–10.0838%5 Sept →
cache13–00.0632%5 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0126%30 Aug →
dust216–140.0439%30 Aug →
inferno13–110.0138%28 Aug →
dust210–130.0229%28 Aug →
inferno4–130.0242%25 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0362%23 Aug →
anubis0–6-0.0767%23 Aug →
anubis13–60.0428%23 Aug →
cache12–16-0.0530%22 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0636%22 Aug →
cache13–50.0623%20 Aug →
cache8–130.0443%20 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0226%20 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0218%18 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0716%18 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0225%16 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0319%16 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0134%16 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0731%15 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0529%15 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0125%15 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0525%15 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0313%15 Aug →
anubis13–10.0015%15 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0916%14 Aug →
vertigo13–110.0226%14 Aug →
anubis13–110.0421%12 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0225%12 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0025%12 Aug →
dust213–90.0238%12 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0038%12 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0624%11 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.