RichRichiy

RichRichiy — CS2 Stats

LV76561198139201592[U:1:178935864]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

420Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,093Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (26 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 420 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

41Days played since 2026-01-23

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches8——
Win rate63%——
K/D1.55——
Headshot %52%——

Measured 18 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate53.1%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy15.9%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.921.061.070.15 short
Match win rate45.1%46.3%46.9%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRichRichiyFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning61
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateWLLWLTLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.1
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time562ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 19 Mar →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · cache, 15 Jun →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 8 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 4 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
2–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 19mirageWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA1912–763%0.03
infernoA1810–856%0.00
cacheA169–756%0.02
dust2C146–843%0.02
mirageD134–931%-0.01
ancientC94–544%0.02
vertigoC73–443%0.03
overpass—20–20%-0.07
nuke—10–10%-0.07
train—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

106,658Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
4,496Matches
45.1%Match win rate
53.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
11,734MVPs
1,910Hours (in match)
4,045Bombs planted
1,023Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4749,075
AWP9,331
P2502,139
FAMAS2,072
Negev1,963

Lifetime map wins

7,307inferno
5,994dust2
1,190nuke
1,030vertigo
655train
398cbble
361lake
207assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

357Matches
54%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
78.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1250%1.0614.6
Mirage1242%1.0615.6
Dust21173%1.1917.6
Inferno757%1.1714.7
Ancient633%1.1519.3
Cache367%1.6413.7
Nuke2100%1.2012.5
Vertigo2100%1.7418.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
566msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
54.2%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
7.03HE damage / grenade
9.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2516% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–5-0.0119%22 Jul →
ancient9–130.0226%11 Jul →
dust25–130.0436%10 Jul →
mirage13–80.0222%10 Jul →
inferno7–130.0321%8 Jul →
inferno12–120.0912%4 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0125%4 Jul →
dust28–130.0121%4 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0313%3 Jul →
dust22–130.0038%3 Jul →
dust213–40.0220%3 Jul →
anubis13–100.0128%1 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0314%30 Jun →
mirage1–13-0.0526%29 Jun →
anubis13–30.0211%29 Jun →
cache5–13-0.0120%28 Jun →
dust213–50.0517%27 Jun →
mirage9–130.0023%24 Jun →
inferno13–100.0228%24 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0729%20 Jun →
inferno13–4-0.0321%19 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0225%19 Jun →
anubis13–50.0626%19 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0337%19 Jun →
dust213–40.0231%19 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0124%18 Jun →
cache13–90.0423%18 Jun →
dust212–12-0.0315%17 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0729%17 Jun →
anubis13–7-0.0425%15 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0223%15 Jun →
cache13–110.0139%15 Jun →
mirage7–130.0522%15 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0719%14 Jun →
dust213–70.1124%14 Jun →
overpass8–13-0.1020%14 Jun →
inferno13–80.0537%14 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.039%13 Jun →
cache13–40.0635%13 Jun →
mirage11–130.0120%13 Jun →
anubis13–40.0421%13 Jun →
cache6–13-0.0423%13 Jun →
dust213–60.0133%13 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0415%13 Jun →
cache3–13-0.0325%8 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0323%8 Jun →
anubis11–130.0619%8 Jun →
anubis13–5-0.0215%6 Jun →
dust213–30.0429%3 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0419%3 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.0325%3 Jun →
cache13–110.0829%3 Jun →
vertigo13–40.0731%3 Jun →
inferno6–130.0220%3 Jun →
dust210–130.0219%3 Jun →
anubis7–130.015%3 Jun →
dust212–12-0.0018%26 May →
train8–13-0.0226%26 May →
cache13–9-0.0128%25 May →
inferno5–13-0.0713%25 May →
ancient2–130.0124%25 May →
anubis13–100.0721%18 May →
cache12–120.0227%18 May →
dust210–130.0222%17 May →
vertigo13–100.0212%17 May →
anubis13–80.0118%17 May →
ancient3–130.019%17 May →
inferno9–13-0.0317%17 May →
cache5–130.0126%16 May →
inferno13–3-0.0019%16 May →
cache13–70.128%16 May →
anubis10–130.0222%11 May →
cache13–50.0225%11 May →
inferno13–6-0.0015%6 May →
cache12–12-0.0014%6 May →
cache13–20.1229%4 May →
cache13–100.0413%4 May →
cache12–12-0.0915%29 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0225%25 Apr →
vertigo8–13-0.0326%25 Apr →
anubis13–60.1029%24 Apr →
inferno13–70.0230%24 Apr →
anubis11–130.0326%10 Apr →
inferno13–60.0221%10 Apr →
vertigo7–130.0835%10 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0622%26 Mar →
ancient13–20.1435%19 Mar →
vertigo13–4-0.0314%19 Mar →
mirage4–130.0521%19 Mar →
anubis13–90.0220%9 Mar →
vertigo8–130.0027%9 Mar →
vertigo7–130.0623%24 Feb →
mirage13–40.0318%24 Feb →
ancient13–80.0825%24 Feb →
inferno13–90.0629%24 Feb →
anubis11–130.0125%24 Feb →
anubis13–100.0420%25 Jan →
inferno13–60.0422%25 Jan →
anubis11–130.0422%24 Jan →
anubis7–130.0423%23 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.