bonkbonkbonkbonk — CS2 Stats
76561198131603449[U:1:171337721]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- 248 below peak (1,056)
- Next: Level 4 at 901 — 93 to go
- Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
- Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28
- Level 2 first seen 2026-08-28
Premier CS Rating
- 4,415 below peak (16,952)
- Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,463 to go
- Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
- Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
- Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 4 median | Level 5 median | vs Level 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 39.1% | 42.7% | 43.8% | 4.7% short |
| Shot accuracy | 0.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | 11.9% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.73 | 0.99 | 1.02 | 0.29 short |
| Match win rate | 42.5% | 43.9% | 44.7% | 2.2% short |
This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).
Limited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like jL 88% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.
Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 73 | 47% | 0.74 | 11.8 |
| Nuke | 47 | 47% | 0.77 | 12.4 |
| Mirage | 42 | 45% | 0.69 | 11.2 |
| Overpass | 30 | 43% | 0.80 | 12.3 |
| Anubis | 27 | 41% | 0.77 | 12.2 |
| Inferno | 24 | 38% | 0.85 | 12.4 |
| Dust2 | 22 | 50% | 0.64 | 9.1 |
| Cache | 12 | 42% | 0.83 | 10.3 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 10.299% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.5534 — below the 4 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 32.3934% — below the 40% mark we flag
Milestones
This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.