tyzmo

tyzmo — CS2 Stats

US76561198129903338[U:1:169637610]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

320Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
820Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#57311 of 232203 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 1 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,518 +3,139 1 Aug19 May · 5 days played
18,37921,685peak 21,6851 Aug19 May
21,685Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2025-08-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate38.8%44.8%45.7%6.9% short
Shot accuracy16.4%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.081.041.05above
Match win rate46.5%45.2%45.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtyzmoFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning68
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46495Last 10046%Win rateLWWWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.2
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.8
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time593ms−96ms
first ⅓ avg 689ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 17 Sept
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 4 May
453msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 3 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 12infernoWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC28121643%0.01
dust2C167944%-0.02
infernoD1551033%-0.01
ancientS128467%0.03
mirageB126650%0.02
nukeC73443%-0.01
anubisC52340%-0.03
overpass32167%-0.02
office1010%-0.00
train110100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,875Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
1,835Matches
46.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
38.8%Headshot %
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
4,467MVPs
820Hours (in match)
1,215Bombs planted
391Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,028inferno
2,961dust2
967train
876nuke
591cbble
273vertigo
97lake
69bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

62Matches
53%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
96.6ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1145%1.7018.9
Inferno1060%1.4624.3
Dust2633%0.8714.0
Ancient667%1.3819.0
Cache5100%1.4420.6
Nuke540%1.0018.2
Overpass2100%2.0522.0
Anubis20%0.7013.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
42.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.4%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
592msReaction time
58.3%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
10.96HE damage / grenade
4.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.0514%18 Sept
ancient13–80.1010%18 Sept
cache13–10.0314%18 Sept
mirage13–80.0416%18 Sept
mirage13–160.0311%18 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0012%17 Sept
ancient13–80.1712%17 Sept
inferno11–130.0017%17 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0310%17 Sept
inferno11–130.0610%17 Sept
dust213–7-0.0025%17 Sept
ancient13–160.079%17 Sept
cache13–90.009%17 Sept
inferno16–19-0.0115%10 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0417%10 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0423%10 Sept
ancient13–70.0615%10 Sept
mirage9–130.0020%10 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0112%9 Sept
inferno19–170.0314%9 Sept
dust25–13-0.0219%9 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0411%9 Sept
mirage13–00.0824%9 Sept
ancient4–130.0110%9 Sept
nuke13–100.0420%9 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0424%8 Sept
dust213–7-0.0311%8 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0714%8 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0024%8 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0326%8 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0731%8 Sept
cache11–13-0.0318%8 Sept
inferno6–130.0823%8 Sept
dust213–9-0.0313%19 May
dust28–13-0.0115%19 May
cache3–13-0.0515%19 May
cache9–130.0117%19 May
inferno13–110.0514%19 May
cache8–13-0.0118%13 May
cache13–40.0716%13 May
cache8–130.0216%12 May
inferno13–9-0.0710%8 May
cache5–13-0.0019%8 May
anubis10–13-0.096%8 May
cache13–110.0611%8 May
cache13–50.0615%7 May
dust210–13-0.019%7 May
cache5–130.0112%7 May
office6–13-0.0016%7 May
cache12–120.0215%7 May
cache13–50.0817%7 May
mirage11–13-0.0217%7 May
nuke8–13-0.0618%6 May
dust213–9-0.0512%6 May
cache10–13-0.0314%6 May
dust210–13-0.028%6 May
overpass7–13-0.0018%6 May
cache13–4-0.0020%6 May
cache12–120.0622%6 May
anubis13–3-0.0120%5 May
cache13–90.0414%5 May
inferno12–12-0.0213%5 May
cache4–13-0.0434%5 May
inferno2–13-0.0224%5 May
cache13–60.0416%5 May
cache5–13-0.0421%5 May
dust213–70.0216%5 May
mirage5–130.0321%5 May
dust28–13-0.0521%5 May
ancient13–70.0016%5 May
cache6–13-0.0417%5 May
cache13–100.0028%5 May
cache4–13-0.0413%5 May
anubis13–10-0.0223%5 May
nuke5–13-0.0711%4 May
mirage13–50.0332%4 May
anubis8–13-0.0131%4 May
inferno15–15-0.0712%4 May
dust213–9-0.0136%4 May
dust28–13-0.0115%4 May
ancient13–70.0026%4 May
dust210–13-0.0127%4 May
ancient16–140.0117%4 May
overpass13–6-0.0811%4 May
dust29–13-0.0211%4 May
cache10–13-0.0019%29 Apr
cache9–130.0120%29 Apr
cache7–00.0910%29 Apr
dust213–7-0.029%29 Apr
mirage13–80.0320%29 Apr
cache13–2-0.0412%29 Apr
inferno12–12-0.0016%17 Dec
train13–70.1319%12 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0616%12 Aug
overpass13–60.027%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0615%6 Aug
ancient13–40.0322%4 Aug
nuke4–130.0912%3 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0222%1 Aug
nuke13–20.0423%1 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →