Jims the Popsicle Pariah — CS2 Stats

76561198129572539[U:1:169306811]

1,621Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,057Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,530Top 10% of 204,097 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16181 of 251169 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,530 +1,623 16 Apr – 1 Oct · 35 days played
18,53226,455peak 26,45516 Apr1 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,638 +0 29 Aug – 21 Sept · 4 observations
1,6381,638peak 1,63829 Aug21 Sept
26,455Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,638Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-04-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,638
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 113 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 925 below peak (26,455)
  • +107 over 30 days · steady
  • +6,998 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,470 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches20——
Win rate65%——
K/D1.18——
Headshot %57%——

Measured 7 Sep 2026 → 10 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,318), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate50.0%49.2%50.7%meets
Shot accuracy17.6%13.4%11.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.041.121.180.14 short
Match win rate44.1%48.5%51.9%7.8% short

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJims the Popsicle PariahPREMIER25,530 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,638csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning46
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–55–2Last 10043%Win rateLLLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · −15ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility5.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.6
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time587ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 5–6 · cache, 9 May →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · ancient, 23 Jul →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 16 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 10 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
8–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 19anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2610–1638%0.02
ancientA1912–763%0.03
nukeA1710–759%0.01
cacheC135–838%0.02
infernoD93–633%0.01
anubisD61–517%-0.02
dust2D62–433%-0.01
overpass—30–30%-0.02
rush_001—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

144,521Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
5,100Matches
44.1%Match win rate
50.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Red band
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Red band
16,756MVPs
6,105Hours (in match)
4,393Bombs planted
1,651Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4753,091
AWP15,668
MP94,313
MAC-103,370
P2502,779

Lifetime map wins

12,745dust2
8,227inferno
5,720nuke
1,611train
769vertigo
503cbble
108office
45bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

635Matches
49%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
75.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5248%0.8713.7
Ancient4949%0.8814.8
Nuke3348%0.9715.1
Anubis1533%0.7112.1
Inferno771%0.9414.9
Overpass757%0.8613.4
Dust2633%0.8013.7
Cache450%0.8015.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
581msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
9.66HE damage / grenade
9.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4821 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3355% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
rush_0014–80.0025%5 Oct →
anubis8–130.0227%1 Oct →
cache9–130.0225%1 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0121%1 Oct →
mirage11–130.0523%30 Sept →
anubis6–130.0318%30 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0513%16 Sept →
ancient13–40.1117%16 Sept →
ancient13–100.0029%13 Sept →
mirage7–130.0320%31 Aug →
cache22–190.0114%31 Aug →
ancient13–100.0114%27 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0314%27 Aug →
mirage13–40.1031%27 Aug →
ancient13–110.019%27 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0226%22 Aug →
nuke13–100.1019%20 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0326%20 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0512%6 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0328%28 Jul →
ancient2–00.09100%23 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0122%22 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0315%22 Jul →
ancient13–20.0310%22 Jul →
mirage11–130.1020%18 Jul →
cache13–160.0616%18 Jul →
nuke13–50.0510%18 Jul →
cache13–110.0220%18 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0722%10 Jul →
mirage13–80.0218%9 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0112%9 Jul →
mirage13–60.1025%9 Jul →
ancient13–40.0516%9 Jul →
cache11–130.0222%8 Jul →
nuke7–130.0229%8 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0415%26 Jun →
nuke11–130.0216%26 Jun →
nuke13–20.048%12 Jun →
mirage13–50.0527%12 Jun →
inferno8–130.0423%12 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0018%11 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0320%11 Jun →
ancient13–60.0335%11 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0412%10 Jun →
nuke13–00.0142%10 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0417%10 Jun →
mirage9–130.1018%10 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0412%9 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0418%9 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0122%9 Jun →
mirage7–130.0015%9 Jun →
nuke13–6-0.0513%6 Jun →
ancient11–130.0418%6 Jun →
mirage7–130.0517%6 Jun →
ancient13–80.0114%5 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0116%5 Jun →
mirage13–110.0014%5 Jun →
overpass15–15-0.0313%27 May →
nuke7–130.0320%27 May →
dust27–13-0.0313%27 May →
mirage10–13-0.0429%26 May →
overpass11–13-0.0317%26 May →
dust213–16-0.0111%26 May →
mirage4–13-0.0713%26 May →
mirage10–130.0217%25 May →
nuke9–13-0.028%25 May →
dust27–13-0.0311%25 May →
inferno13–70.0716%25 May →
dust213–90.0330%20 May →
ancient13–90.0515%20 May →
ancient8–130.0712%19 May →
mirage9–130.0528%19 May →
mirage13–110.0437%16 May →
mirage5–13-0.0426%16 May →
dust216–140.0324%16 May →
inferno13–5-0.0326%15 May →
cache13–60.0316%9 May →
cache5–60.3118%9 May →
cache11–13-0.0215%30 Apr →
cache12–12-0.0218%30 Apr →
ancient13–10-0.0214%29 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0535%28 Apr →
anubis6–13-0.0817%25 Apr →
ancient9–130.0421%24 Apr →
nuke13–80.1215%23 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0020%23 Apr →
inferno13–6-0.0018%22 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0622%21 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0231%21 Apr →
inferno14–160.0430%21 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0221%19 Apr →
mirage13–90.1022%19 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0317%18 Apr →
inferno10–130.0518%18 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0215%18 Apr →
nuke13–9-0.0127%16 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0114%16 Apr →
ancient14–160.0914%16 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0120%16 Apr →
mirage13–50.0419%16 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.