Konkeli

Konkeli — CS2 Stats

76561198129031457[U:1:168765729]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,824Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,441Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,865 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (59 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,824 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,748 +1,749 4 Jul – 6 Jul · 3 days played
24,99926,748peak 26,7484 Jul6 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,865 +0 6 Sept – 7 Sept · 2 observations
1,8651,865peak 1,8656 Sept7 Sept
26,822Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,865Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
19Days played since 2026-05-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,865
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 136 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate53.4%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy13.7%13.2%13.7%meets
Kill/death ratio1.251.071.09above
Match win rate62.4%46.9%48.4%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 10 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKonkeliFACEITLevel 9 · 1,865 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,865csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning54
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateLWWLWTWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −6.9pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time601ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 5–0 · dust2, 5 Jul →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 10–0 · mirage, 5 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · anubis, 1 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 19 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 65% over 20ancientWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2311–1248%0.01
cacheS2013–765%0.07
dust2C176–1135%0.03
nukeB105–550%0.02
anubisA95–456%0.03
infernoA85–363%0.04
ancientD81–713%0.00
overpass—31–233%0.06
vertigo—21–150%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

204,541Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
7,650Matches
62.4%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 9 players
53.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
18,004MVPs
3,441Hours (in match)
5,244Bombs planted
2,002Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4791,042
AWP16,286
P2503,531
SSG 083,411
P903,088
FAMAS3,006

Lifetime map wins

12,374dust2
10,010inferno
7,128nuke
3,410train
1,449cbble
1,328vertigo
88bank
55office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

889Matches
52%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
95.2ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient838%1.2217.5
Nuke650%1.7421.8
Mirage633%1.3416.7
Inferno560%1.3022.0
Anubis425%0.9214.0
Overpass2100%1.0519.0
Dust22100%2.0220.5
Train2100%6.2521.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
598msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
13.5%Flash assists
7.51HE damage / grenade
7.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.4576% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–16-0.0330%8 Aug →
dust213–60.0616%8 Aug →
inferno13–50.0114%8 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0320%28 Jul →
nuke13–80.0216%28 Jul →
dust212–120.0416%25 Jul →
anubis13–70.0022%25 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0422%25 Jul →
mirage13–90.0727%25 Jul →
cache13–30.0033%6 Jul →
mirage13–100.0525%6 Jul →
dust25–13-0.1026%6 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0819%6 Jul →
mirage11–130.0134%6 Jul →
nuke7–130.0125%6 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0330%6 Jul →
anubis13–40.1228%6 Jul →
cache13–30.1153%6 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0620%6 Jul →
nuke13–40.0426%6 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0519%6 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0214%6 Jul →
mirage0–7-0.070%6 Jul →
nuke13–60.0440%6 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.1017%6 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0118%6 Jul →
mirage13–70.0223%6 Jul →
ancient6–130.0424%5 Jul →
inferno6–130.0427%5 Jul →
dust212–12-0.0230%5 Jul →
mirage10–00.1457%5 Jul →
nuke12–120.0629%5 Jul →
anubis12–12-0.0514%5 Jul →
cache13–20.0320%5 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0018%5 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0911%5 Jul →
inferno13–80.0016%5 Jul →
dust25–00.2111%5 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.0017%5 Jul →
cache13–100.1016%5 Jul →
mirage13–1-0.0318%4 Jul →
inferno13–70.0222%4 Jul →
mirage11–6-0.0310%4 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0717%4 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0120%4 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0413%4 Jul →
dust213–10.0528%4 Jul →
inferno12–120.0720%1 Jul →
mirage11–130.1132%1 Jul →
cache13–40.1931%1 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0231%1 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.058%25 Jun →
overpass11–130.0317%25 Jun →
cache8–130.0319%25 Jun →
mirage13–70.129%25 Jun →
dust213–50.0111%25 Jun →
mirage13–100.1114%5 Jun →
overpass6–130.0124%1 Jun →
nuke13–60.0613%1 Jun →
anubis13–90.1028%1 Jun →
inferno13–20.0833%1 Jun →
dust29–13-0.018%1 Jun →
cache8–130.0219%1 Jun →
ancient4–130.0524%1 Jun →
mirage1–130.0017%1 Jun →
cache11–13-0.0129%31 May →
nuke10–130.0918%31 May →
vertigo13–110.1423%31 May →
cache13–110.0425%30 May →
ancient7–130.0923%29 May →
mirage10–130.0211%29 May →
mirage9–13-0.0323%28 May →
cache13–80.1222%28 May →
dust27–130.0622%28 May →
anubis13–80.1019%28 May →
cache6–130.0418%28 May →
anubis13–11-0.085%25 May →
cache8–130.0333%25 May →
vertigo11–130.0822%24 May →
dust212–120.0319%24 May →
cache13–100.0534%24 May →
cache13–110.0844%24 May →
cache13–60.1623%24 May →
dust210–130.0627%23 May →
cache10–130.0727%23 May →
ancient5–130.0217%23 May →
inferno13–70.0825%23 May →
anubis9–130.0116%23 May →
overpass13–110.1516%23 May →
mirage5–130.0817%23 May →
nuke6–130.0217%23 May →
cache13–70.1216%23 May →
dust213–10.1415%23 May →
cache7–130.0719%22 May →
mirage13–50.0314%19 May →
dust28–130.0417%19 May →
cache13–0-0.0025%19 May →
ancient10–13-0.0518%19 May →
anubis7–130.0916%19 May →
cache13–80.0823%19 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.