whogotasprite

whogotasprite — CS2 Stats

76561198128050177[U:1:167784449]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

691Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,534Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,578Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#66523 of 224849 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 20 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,578 -403 20 Apr12 Sept · 19 days played
19,65322,540peak 22,54020 Apr12 Sept
22,812Peak Premier in tracked matches
50Days played since 2026-04-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,962 below peak (22,540)
  • +578 over 30 days · improving
  • -143 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,422 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches84+4
Win rate63%25%+38pp
K/D1.041.03+0.01
Headshot %46%46%−0pp

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate51.5%48.3%51.0%meets
Shot accuracy17.8%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.191.071.09above
Match win rate45.4%46.9%48.4%3.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwhogotaspriteFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,578 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning60
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43543Last 10043%Win rateLLWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.8
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.8

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.0
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time556ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 14 Jun
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 9 May
406msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 18 Jun
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 29 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 20anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2271532%-0.01
mirageC2291341%0.01
cacheA2012860%0.03
infernoB136746%0.01
ancientA127558%0.02
anubisD61517%0.00
nuke4040%-0.03
shelter110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

153,801Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
5,091Matches
45.4%Match win rate
51.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
17.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
12,039MVPs
2,909Hours (in match)
3,437Bombs planted
1,213Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4765,212
AWP13,625
P2506,416
P902,438
FAMAS2,299
Tec-91,907

Lifetime map wins

9,831dust2
5,848inferno
2,183cbble
1,923nuke
1,060train
258vertigo
128office
52italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

446Matches
56%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
93.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4156%1.4218.7
Dust23757%1.2117.4
Mirage3667%1.3319.5
Inferno1741%1.2217.2
Ancient1527%0.9515.3
Cache1080%1.9322.0
Nuke729%1.1518.0
Train771%1.5025.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
546msReaction time
36.0%T opening success
42.8%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
6.99HE damage / grenade
7.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9712% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.0814%12 Sept
cache4–130.0121%12 Sept
mirage16–130.0225%10 Sept
ancient13–40.0922%10 Sept
cache13–80.017%10 Sept
mirage13–60.1219%10 Sept
ancient12–160.0119%7 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0620%7 Sept
inferno14–160.0129%7 Sept
mirage13–90.0519%6 Sept
dust211–130.0220%6 Sept
cache13–9-0.0321%3 Sept
cache12–12-0.0110%21 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0318%18 Aug
dust28–130.0516%18 Aug
ancient13–110.0115%18 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0315%18 Aug
dust213–110.0416%13 Aug
cache13–80.1215%12 Aug
cache13–60.1321%8 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0415%6 Aug
nuke3–13-0.1211%6 Aug
dust211–130.0018%5 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0314%5 Aug
dust216–140.0320%5 Aug
ancient2–2-0.0118%5 Aug
dust24–13-0.0814%5 Aug
cache9–130.0519%5 Aug
anubis7–130.0315%4 Aug
shelter13–50.0613%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0616%31 Jul
mirage13–110.0224%31 Jul
dust24–13-0.0411%31 Jul
dust28–130.0221%30 Jul
cache13–50.0812%29 Jul
anubis13–10.059%29 Jul
inferno13–20.1118%29 Jul
dust213–80.0512%29 Jul
inferno13–80.1316%29 Jul
mirage8–100.0318%28 Jul
nuke9–130.0121%27 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0413%27 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0217%27 Jul
mirage16–140.1121%25 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0722%23 Jul
inferno13–80.0019%23 Jul
inferno6–13-0.075%21 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0119%21 Jul
ancient13–20.0718%21 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0218%21 Jul
anubis12–120.0313%19 Jul
dust213–30.0029%19 Jul
cache11–13-0.0617%19 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0210%19 Jul
dust213–70.0418%14 Jul
cache13–50.0230%13 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0215%12 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0622%9 Jul
cache13–50.0323%7 Jul
dust26–13-0.0222%5 Jul
cache13–80.0320%5 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0522%4 Jul
mirage13–160.0512%1 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0217%1 Jul
nuke4–130.0110%1 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0317%29 Jun
inferno13–100.0319%29 Jun
ancient13–80.1229%28 Jun
cache13–100.0420%27 Jun
mirage10–130.0516%27 Jun
cache4–13-0.0631%27 Jun
ancient13–60.0615%23 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0816%18 Jun
dust212–12-0.0514%18 Jun
dust22–13-0.0517%18 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0426%14 Jun
cache13–60.1515%14 Jun
mirage10–130.0231%10 Jun
dust27–110.0424%3 Jun
dust26–13-0.0320%1 Jun
cache13–5-0.0220%1 Jun
ancient13–80.0520%24 May
dust25–13-0.0419%24 May
cache6–13-0.0124%24 May
inferno7–130.0222%15 May
inferno7–13-0.0417%11 May
cache9–13-0.0114%11 May
nuke11–13-0.0312%10 May
mirage13–60.009%10 May
dust26–13-0.1118%10 May
mirage10–130.0117%9 May
mirage13–90.1025%9 May
dust213–80.0438%9 May
cache10–130.1020%5 May
inferno13–100.0222%3 May
dust213–30.0115%3 May
cache13–70.0424%1 May
dust29–13-0.0127%26 Apr
inferno5–130.0715%26 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0522%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →