marats no b2ds

marats no b2ds — CS2 Stats

76561198140884820[U:1:180619092]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

847Tracked matches38%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,106Top 50% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#52832 of 251443 tracked
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,106 +2,899 20 May – 24 Sept · 19 days played
18,86522,826peak 22,82620 May24 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,305 +0 30 Aug – 18 Sept · 3 observations
1,3051,305peak 1,30530 Aug18 Sept
22,959Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,305Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-05-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,305
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 46 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 720 below peak (22,826)
  • +2,357 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,894 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmarats no b2dsPREMIER22,106 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,305csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning60
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39–54–7Last 10039%Win rateLLLLLTWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −62ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility4.3
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning6.0
Utility4.3
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time560ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 8–13 · anubis, 24 Sept →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · inferno, 24 May →
422msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · mirage, 15 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 14 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L5Current streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 53% over 19anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D3010–2033%-0.02
mirageB1910–953%-0.00
cacheC166–1038%-0.02
infernoC104–640%-0.05
ancientC94–544%-0.04
anubisD71–614%-0.02
nuke—42–250%-0.01
overpass—20–20%-0.04
shelter—10–10%-0.03
fachwerk—11–0100%0.00
boulder—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

538Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
76.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9957%1.0415.0
Dust27349%0.8713.5
Anubis6555%1.1515.2
Ancient5357%1.0115.0
Inferno5240%0.9613.7
Nuke2055%0.8513.6
Overpass1753%1.2016.2
Vertigo1362%0.9812.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
70.4%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
565msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
42.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
7.39HE damage / grenade
8.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.473 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9048% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–13-0.1015%24 Sept →
anubis8–130.1215%24 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0415%21 Sept →
overpass10–13-0.0128%21 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.098%19 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0715%19 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.058%19 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0512%19 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0818%19 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0612%17 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0315%17 Sept →
dust27–13-0.019%17 Sept →
mirage11–130.0137%15 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0212%15 Sept →
cache6–130.047%14 Sept →
inferno13–20.0313%14 Sept →
mirage13–110.0310%14 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0621%12 Sept →
shelter5–13-0.0314%11 Sept →
fachwerk13–50.0017%11 Sept →
boulder13–10-0.0122%11 Sept →
dust23–13-0.027%11 Sept →
anubis9–130.010%11 Sept →
cache1–130.0024%11 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0613%10 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0322%10 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0220%10 Sept →
mirage13–110.0913%3 Sept →
cache13–90.0013%3 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0630%1 Sept →
dust213–50.0117%1 Sept →
mirage13–20.0228%16 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0114%16 Aug →
cache13–60.0321%8 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0615%2 Aug →
ancient13–100.0311%2 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0226%2 Aug →
cache13–110.0318%2 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0318%2 Aug →
mirage16–140.0117%25 Jul →
anubis12–12-0.0613%19 Jul →
dust213–3-0.0432%19 Jul →
cache11–130.0225%19 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0429%19 Jul →
nuke13–60.0613%18 Jul →
dust213–70.0017%14 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0535%12 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0712%29 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0411%29 Jun →
dust28–13-0.1026%24 Jun →
ancient13–60.0219%23 Jun →
dust213–100.0217%23 Jun →
overpass8–13-0.0718%21 Jun →
mirage10–130.0220%21 Jun →
dust213–70.0121%21 Jun →
mirage13–90.0410%21 Jun →
dust213–6-0.0719%20 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0719%20 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0815%20 Jun →
mirage13–80.0319%16 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0213%16 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0236%15 Jun →
dust24–11-0.0714%15 Jun →
dust210–130.0122%15 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.109%15 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0317%14 Jun →
cache13–6-0.0721%14 Jun →
dust213–90.0826%14 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0325%10 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.0420%10 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0222%10 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0811%10 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0232%10 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0315%10 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0520%10 Jun →
mirage13–110.0024%10 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0919%9 Jun →
cache13–40.0635%9 Jun →
dust212–12-0.0225%9 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0814%9 Jun →
inferno13–5-0.0530%9 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0522%9 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0018%9 Jun →
ancient13–20.0017%8 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0218%4 Jun →
dust25–13-0.065%4 Jun →
dust213–90.1023%4 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.127%2 Jun →
cache7–13-0.0510%30 May →
nuke3–13-0.0320%30 May →
mirage2–13-0.0413%30 May →
inferno10–13-0.0339%24 May →
ancient16–12-0.0423%21 May →
mirage9–13-0.0510%20 May →
dust29–130.0237%20 May →
dust24–00.0711%20 May →
cache12–12-0.0620%12 May →
dust211–130.0023%12 May →
mirage13–20.0328%12 May →
dust211–13-0.0423%11 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.