RageDogDS

RageDogDS — CS2 Stats

DK76561198127597170[U:1:167331442]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,812Tracked matches52%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,915Purple band · top ~24.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,915 +2,204 31 Aug – 30 Sept · 20 days played
13,47816,719peak 16,71931 Aug30 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,030 +0 31 Aug – 2 Sept · 2 observations
1,0301,030peak 1,03031 Aug2 Sept
16,719Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,030Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 804 below peak (16,719)
  • +2,204 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,085 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRageDogDSFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,915 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,030csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning47
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateWLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −124ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility5.5
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning4.7
Utility5.5
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time610ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · train, 31 Aug →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · office, 16 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · italy, 31 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2010–1050%-0.02
cacheB178–947%-0.04
mirageB168–850%-0.00
anubisC145–936%-0.02
nukeA148–657%-0.03
ancientA85–363%-0.00
dust2—42–250%-0.06
office—42–250%-0.00
rush_001—10–10%-0.09
train—11–0100%0.11
italy—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

175Matches
51%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
65.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4452%0.6710.9
Inferno3765%0.8012.4
Ancient3244%0.8012.2
Nuke2171%0.8812.1
Train1833%0.8514.1
Overpass1533%0.6812.0
Dust2633%0.549.7
Anubis20%0.549.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.3%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
67.7%Counter-strafing
12.7°Preaim
613msReaction time
48.3%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
13.06HE damage / grenade
6.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.7071° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2993% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.474 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–11-0.0613%25 Oct →
rush_0015–8-0.0911%23 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.019%16 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0411%16 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0115%30 Sept →
ancient13–60.0011%30 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0514%30 Sept →
inferno16–130.0024%30 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0511%30 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0117%26 Sept →
cache15–150.0124%26 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0412%26 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0614%25 Sept →
dust213–100.0016%25 Sept →
mirage8–130.0120%24 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0511%24 Sept →
dust26–13-0.1413%24 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0221%23 Sept →
cache13–30.0825%23 Sept →
inferno6–130.0010%22 Sept →
mirage15–150.0318%22 Sept →
nuke13–90.0113%22 Sept →
cache8–13-0.108%22 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0614%21 Sept →
anubis13–80.0110%21 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0312%21 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0710%20 Sept →
anubis13–100.0117%20 Sept →
cache13–7-0.055%20 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.068%19 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0312%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.0016%19 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.1015%19 Sept →
ancient11–130.0814%19 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0513%19 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0512%19 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0614%19 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0421%16 Sept →
nuke13–60.0213%16 Sept →
office13–10-0.0438%16 Sept →
mirage13–10.0620%16 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0112%16 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0313%15 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0311%9 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.049%9 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.048%9 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0410%8 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.056%8 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.077%8 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0113%8 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.035%8 Sept →
mirage4–130.0418%8 Sept →
anubis13–60.0110%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.0618%8 Sept →
office13–20.065%8 Sept →
office6–13-0.0716%8 Sept →
office7–130.0420%8 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0120%7 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0322%7 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.035%7 Sept →
cache13–60.0017%7 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.074%7 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.074%7 Sept →
inferno13–70.073%7 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.074%6 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.038%6 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0814%6 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0511%6 Sept →
mirage8–130.0120%6 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0611%5 Sept →
ancient13–110.0310%5 Sept →
inferno13–90.069%5 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0215%5 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.039%5 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.014%5 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0318%5 Sept →
ancient13–30.019%5 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0810%5 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0113%5 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0421%5 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0519%4 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0712%4 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.099%4 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0126%4 Sept →
inferno13–80.008%2 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0216%2 Sept →
cache13–30.0013%2 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0813%2 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0324%2 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0013%1 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0313%1 Sept →
mirage13–90.0521%1 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.012%1 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0618%1 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.019%31 Aug →
train13–40.1115%31 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.055%31 Aug →
italy10–13-0.0415%31 Aug →
anubis12–12-0.0014%31 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0617%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.