*°• Dybber★LADEMAD •°*

*°• Dybber★LADEMAD •°* — CS2 Stats

PY76561198179600237[U:1:219334509]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,707Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating20,617Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#74112 of 257767 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,617 -2,100 30 Aug – 26 Oct · 21 days played
19,36422,717peak 22,71730 Aug26 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,706 +0 30 Aug – 1 Sept · 3 observations
1,7061,706peak 1,70630 Aug1 Sept
22,717Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,706Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,100 below peak (22,717)
  • +720 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,383 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG*°• Dybber★LADEMAD •°*FACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER20,617 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,706csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning68
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateLLWLWTWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility7.4
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch5.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.8
Utility7.4
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels6.9
Win Impact7.4

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time638ms+46ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 10 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · nuke, 22 Sept →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 14 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 12 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 22anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2213–959%0.03
cacheA2214–864%0.05
mirageC156–940%0.02
ancientA106–460%0.01
dust2C94–544%0.01
anubisD82–625%0.01
nukeD62–433%0.04
train—32–167%0.02
overpass—21–150%0.01
vertigo—20–20%0.08
office—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

626Matches
53%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
92.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8751%1.2518.2
Inferno7765%1.3619.3
Ancient6548%1.1817.1
Nuke3471%1.3818.1
Anubis2361%1.2017.4
Dust22143%1.0616.3
Train1724%1.1719.2
Overpass1540%1.3219.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
637msReaction time
63.8%T opening success
51.2%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
12.4%Flash assists
13.09HE damage / grenade
12.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.0324%26 Oct →
nuke13–160.0413%26 Oct →
cache13–30.0222%26 Oct →
inferno11–130.0219%23 Oct →
train13–50.0618%22 Oct →
overpass12–12-0.0017%22 Oct →
inferno13–110.0127%21 Oct →
cache13–70.0517%18 Oct →
inferno9–130.0517%17 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0212%17 Oct →
mirage5–130.1215%15 Oct →
cache9–130.1013%15 Oct →
cache13–70.0524%15 Oct →
inferno13–50.0310%14 Oct →
inferno13–30.0921%14 Oct →
cache8–130.0917%14 Oct →
inferno10–130.0524%14 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0126%14 Oct →
overpass13–50.0321%14 Oct →
cache13–20.0327%12 Oct →
inferno15–19-0.0625%11 Oct →
ancient13–60.0421%11 Oct →
cache16–140.1317%11 Oct →
cache13–110.0318%11 Oct →
nuke6–130.0119%11 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0017%10 Oct →
inferno13–90.0715%10 Oct →
cache13–20.2116%10 Oct →
vertigo7–130.1120%10 Oct →
inferno13–100.0817%10 Oct →
mirage2–130.0116%10 Oct →
train13–10-0.0112%10 Oct →
ancient5–130.0215%10 Oct →
cache7–130.0212%10 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0319%9 Oct →
nuke13–90.1029%9 Oct →
nuke12–160.0316%9 Oct →
dust213–110.1022%9 Oct →
inferno13–90.0319%7 Oct →
mirage13–70.0119%7 Oct →
mirage13–90.0917%7 Oct →
dust213–50.0316%7 Oct →
anubis16–140.0116%6 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0120%6 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0613%6 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0314%5 Oct →
ancient9–130.0020%4 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0026%4 Oct →
inferno15–150.0123%4 Oct →
mirage13–20.0824%4 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0420%3 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0517%3 Oct →
anubis4–130.0514%3 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0320%3 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.110%3 Oct →
cache13–60.0930%3 Oct →
train7–130.0222%2 Oct →
dust29–130.0024%2 Oct →
mirage8–130.1118%2 Oct →
cache10–130.0717%2 Oct →
inferno13–110.0121%1 Oct →
ancient13–70.0412%1 Oct →
cache13–80.0320%1 Oct →
mirage13–100.0212%1 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0315%30 Sept →
ancient13–60.0121%30 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0425%30 Sept →
inferno16–130.0620%30 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0422%30 Sept →
ancient13–110.0916%30 Sept →
inferno13–60.027%27 Sept →
cache13–90.0515%27 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0215%27 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0121%27 Sept →
inferno13–110.0121%27 Sept →
anubis10–130.0424%26 Sept →
anubis8–130.0114%26 Sept →
anubis13–80.0721%26 Sept →
inferno10–130.0221%26 Sept →
cache15–150.0214%26 Sept →
inferno13–110.1017%26 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0124%25 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0328%25 Sept →
dust213–80.0327%25 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0325%25 Sept →
cache13–90.0433%24 Sept →
mirage8–130.0217%24 Sept →
ancient13–70.0327%24 Sept →
dust26–130.0321%24 Sept →
office2–13-0.0127%24 Sept →
vertigo4–130.0622%24 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0024%23 Sept →
inferno13–70.1125%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0825%23 Sept →
cache13–30.1229%23 Sept →
inferno6–130.0418%22 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0016%22 Sept →
nuke13–90.0933%22 Sept →
cache8–130.0416%22 Sept →
cache13–40.0431%21 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.