Onizein オニゼイン

Onizein オニゼイン — CS2 Stats

76561198127310813[U:1:167045085]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,184Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,981Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating5,000Light Blue band · top ~78.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+109Premier CS Rating · 4,891 → 5,000

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,000 +1,407 8 Sept – 1 Oct · 14 days played
3,3165,000peak 5,0008 Sept1 Oct
5,117Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 5,000
  • +1,407 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,916), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate32.1%41.3%41.8%9.7% short
Shot accuracy15.7%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.850.950.980.13 short
Match win rate34.3%42.6%43.3%9.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOnizein オニゼインFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER5,000 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning53
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37–52–11Last 10037%Win rateTLTWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · +41ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 769ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 696ms

Last 20

  • 10–7–3 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 676ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility4.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 671ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning5.3
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact8.1

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time674ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 698ms → last ⅓ avg 674ms
Headshot accuracy11.1%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 11.7% → last ⅓ avg 11.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–10 · inferno, 11 Sept →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 7–0 · inferno, 16 Sept →
523msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · cache, 16 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 11 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 10anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC218–1338%0.02
mirageC187–1139%0.01
nukeC146–843%0.00
cacheD113–827%0.01
dust2B105–550%-0.02
anubisD81–713%-0.02
ancientB63–350%0.00
vertigoC52–340%-0.01
office—20–20%-0.04
fachwerk—21–150%0.03
boulder—11–0100%0.06
train—10–10%0.05
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

120,669Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
6,789Matches
34.3%Match win rate
32.1%Headshot %
15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
11,097MVPs
2,981Hours (in match)
7,099Bombs planted
1,169Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,512
AWP15,234
P2505,565
UMP-452,653
FAMAS2,287

Lifetime map wins

11,137dust2
8,101inferno
3,505nuke
1,390train
1,285vertigo
244cbble
198office
89italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

221Matches
45%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
70.8ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3933%0.8514.3
Mirage3749%0.9611.5
Inferno3053%0.9214.7
Cache2642%0.9215.2
Dust22548%0.8612.7
Ancient2129%0.7714.3
Anubis1963%0.9113.2
Overpass367%0.5710.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.4%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
671msReaction time
51.9%T opening success
33.3%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
7.65HE damage / grenade
6.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.3503% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4957 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.287% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust215–150.0210%1 Oct →
nuke11–130.0312%1 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.038%1 Oct →
inferno13–100.0711%1 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.048%1 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0810%30 Sept →
nuke13–110.059%30 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0716%30 Sept →
ancient13–60.0112%30 Sept →
inferno13–30.128%30 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0220%30 Sept →
inferno13–80.0410%30 Sept →
mirage15–150.0515%30 Sept →
dust216–13-0.016%30 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0312%30 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0011%30 Sept →
inferno13–60.029%30 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.028%30 Sept →
vertigo10–130.008%30 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.088%30 Sept →
inferno4–90.0811%30 Sept →
inferno6–90.0525%30 Sept →
office2–13-0.0432%30 Sept →
mirage13–50.029%29 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.006%28 Sept →
nuke13–100.075%27 Sept →
inferno13–50.0620%27 Sept →
anubis13–70.029%27 Sept →
office4–13-0.0411%27 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.107%27 Sept →
vertigo13–5-0.032%27 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.028%27 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0613%27 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0311%26 Sept →
boulder13–20.069%26 Sept →
cache8–130.019%26 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0729%26 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0324%26 Sept →
inferno9–130.0018%25 Sept →
inferno7–130.0316%25 Sept →
dust28–13-0.017%25 Sept →
cache13–50.0527%25 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0412%25 Sept →
nuke6–130.0717%25 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0317%24 Sept →
cache9–130.0415%24 Sept →
cache4–130.0916%24 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0111%22 Sept →
anubis10–130.009%22 Sept →
nuke13–40.0514%22 Sept →
dust28–3-0.0617%22 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.049%21 Sept →
anubis10–130.0110%21 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0410%21 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0321%21 Sept →
mirage12–160.0023%21 Sept →
mirage13–90.1211%21 Sept →
nuke13–60.0623%21 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0313%21 Sept →
ancient13–90.0711%21 Sept →
cache15–190.0012%17 Sept →
mirage13–160.0310%17 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0219%17 Sept →
ancient13–70.0512%17 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0516%16 Sept →
inferno7–00.0133%16 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.083%16 Sept →
inferno12–120.0323%16 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0212%16 Sept →
dust212–12-0.079%16 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0113%16 Sept →
ancient8–130.016%15 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0311%15 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0115%15 Sept →
inferno11–130.0910%13 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.044%13 Sept →
cache13–90.0416%13 Sept →
mirage6–130.0513%13 Sept →
train4–130.058%12 Sept →
fachwerk8–130.0111%12 Sept →
cache5–130.019%12 Sept →
cache12–12-0.054%12 Sept →
anubis12–120.0117%12 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.049%12 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.014%12 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0514%11 Sept →
mirage13–00.0727%11 Sept →
vertigo13–40.068%11 Sept →
mirage9–130.079%11 Sept →
inferno13–100.1416%11 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0815%11 Sept →
mirage13–110.015%8 Sept →
mirage14–160.009%8 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.044%8 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0215%8 Sept →
dust213–70.0524%8 Sept →
overpass7–13-0.0214%7 Sept →
vertigo7–13-0.105%7 Sept →
fachwerk13–60.0523%7 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.116%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.