Marhauer^

Marhauer^ — CS2 Stats

DK76561198125455091[U:1:165189363]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,975Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,504Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,550Blue band · top ~30.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 13 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,550 -394 13 Aug22 Sept · 27 days played
13,45117,952peak 17,95213 Aug22 Sept
18,314Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-08-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,402 below peak (17,952)
  • -1,100 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 450 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches204+16
Win rate50%25%+25pp
K/D1.130.86+0.27
Headshot %37%44%−7pp

Measured 14 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; previous 10 Sep 2026 → 14 Sep 2026.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches41
Win rate41%
K/D1.08
Headshot %39%

Measured 29 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,407), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.2%42.7%43.8%5.6% short
Shot accuracy11.2%11.3%12.0%0.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.040.991.02above
Match win rate43.3%43.9%44.7%1.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMarhauer^FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,550 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning52
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateLLWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility7.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.2
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time620ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–1 · overpass, 21 Sept
40%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 18 Aug
398msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 25 Aug
13–3Biggest win · inferno, 20 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 20anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC30131743%0.02
ancientC2191243%0.03
nukeA2011955%0.02
anubisC145936%0.01
mirageC114736%-0.01
overpass110100%0.16
cache1010%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.04
dust21010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

116,034Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
6,546Matches
43.3%Match win rate
38.2%Headshot %
11.2%Shot accuracy
14,882MVPs
2,865Hours (in match)
9,756Bombs planted
1,660Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,429
AWP12,607
MAC-106,582
AUG3,576
SG 5532,599
MP92,534

Lifetime map wins

17,238nuke
15,685inferno
4,131vertigo
1,371dust2
1,044train
201cbble
171assault
141office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

21Matches
38%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno650%1.2817.8
Nuke2100%5.0016.0
Anubis10%0.254.0
Vertigo10%1.7124.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
628msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
51.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
13.15HE damage / grenade
10.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1215% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.0557% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0620%22 Sept
ancient9–130.0317%22 Sept
anubis3–00.1417%22 Sept
nuke13–70.0016%22 Sept
inferno13–80.0818%22 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0117%22 Sept
ancient10–130.039%22 Sept
anubis7–130.033%21 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0024%21 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0010%21 Sept
anubis10–130.0413%21 Sept
inferno13–40.0512%21 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0213%21 Sept
overpass9–10.164%21 Sept
inferno13–30.0415%20 Sept
inferno13–60.1523%20 Sept
ancient9–13-0.037%19 Sept
anubis9–130.019%19 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0310%19 Sept
inferno13–70.0116%17 Sept
ancient11–13-0.079%17 Sept
inferno10–13-0.039%11 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0710%11 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0416%10 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0620%10 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0114%10 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0519%9 Sept
inferno11–130.0112%9 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0613%9 Sept
inferno10–130.0317%9 Sept
cache7–130.0113%8 Sept
anubis13–60.0319%8 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0817%8 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0221%8 Sept
inferno13–100.1010%8 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0311%8 Sept
ancient13–80.0422%7 Sept
nuke13–70.0813%7 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0521%7 Sept
ancient7–130.1420%7 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0510%4 Sept
anubis13–80.0222%4 Sept
nuke13–70.0214%3 Sept
nuke10–130.0917%28 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0229%28 Aug
mirage4–130.0016%28 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0414%28 Aug
nuke12–160.0118%27 Aug
nuke8–130.0317%27 Aug
ancient13–60.1420%27 Aug
ancient13–100.026%26 Aug
inferno13–70.0217%26 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0210%26 Aug
anubis13–110.056%26 Aug
inferno13–110.0411%26 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0123%26 Aug
inferno13–90.0910%25 Aug
inferno13–50.0511%25 Aug
ancient13–7-0.025%25 Aug
mirage16–130.0216%25 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0010%25 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0417%25 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0314%25 Aug
ancient10–130.1021%25 Aug
nuke13–40.0621%24 Aug
inferno11–130.0111%24 Aug
nuke16–140.0210%24 Aug
inferno15–150.017%24 Aug
ancient13–30.1014%23 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0119%23 Aug
nuke10–130.0214%23 Aug
inferno10–130.0615%23 Aug
mirage13–50.0712%22 Aug
vertigo5–9-0.0419%22 Aug
nuke13–50.0616%20 Aug
nuke13–100.1324%20 Aug
inferno6–90.069%20 Aug
nuke3–9-0.0411%20 Aug
inferno13–80.0220%19 Aug
mirage13–90.0119%19 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0118%19 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0625%19 Aug
ancient13–110.0213%19 Aug
ancient13–100.117%19 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0840%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0216%18 Aug
ancient13–80.068%18 Aug
dust21–13-0.0727%17 Aug
inferno13–100.0427%17 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0219%17 Aug
ancient14–160.0716%16 Aug
ancient7–130.0429%16 Aug
inferno13–60.0223%16 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0716%16 Aug
nuke11–130.0028%15 Aug
nuke13–90.0117%14 Aug
nuke13–30.1115%14 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0317%14 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0110%13 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0312%13 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →