Nikkilä

Nikkilä — CS2 Stats

FI76561198124614162[U:1:164348434]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

494Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,160Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,551Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79974 of 221129 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 30 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,551 +1,036 3 Jul16 Sept · 9 days played
18,51521,145peak 21,1453 Jul16 Sept
21,672Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-06-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,594 below peak (21,145)
  • -862 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 449 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches30
Win rate33%
K/D0.71
Headshot %54%

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 8 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.7%46.8%48.3%4.6% short
Shot accuracy18.7%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.061.061.07meets
Match win rate40.8%46.3%46.9%6.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNikkiläFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,551 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning35
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52462Last 10052%Win rateLWLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility4.4
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning3.5
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time592ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–3 · debris, 13 Jul
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · nuke, 3 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · vertigo, 30 Aug
12–1Biggest win · cache, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
139In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 61% over 36ancientWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA36221461%0.00
mirageA25151060%0.00
cacheC146843%-0.01
dust2B84450%-0.01
ancientD5050%-0.03
vertigo31233%-0.04
inferno2020%-0.01
anubis2020%-0.04
boulder21150%0.01
debris110100%0.21
shelter110100%0.06
fachwerk110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

75,749Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,241Matches
40.8%Match win rate
43.7%Headshot %
18.7%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 8 players
8,875MVPs
1,235Hours (in match)
3,167Bombs planted
824Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,250
AWP6,456
MP91,717
MAC-101,598
P2501,437
AUG1,161

Lifetime map wins

2,757dust2
1,920nuke
1,294inferno
1,111train
581vertigo
426lake
255cbble
136office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

343Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
83.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6949%1.2317.1
Nuke6665%1.2217.1
Ancient2438%1.0115.5
Cache2339%1.0317.8
Inferno1145%0.8914.1
Dust2978%0.9313.1
Vertigo933%0.9516.8
Overpass850%1.0514.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
586msReaction time
21.2%T opening success
27.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
7.76HE damage / grenade
5.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.1843% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0318%16 Sept
dust213–11-0.057%16 Sept
mirage8–130.0112%8 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.109%30 Aug
nuke11–130.0321%29 Aug
ancient4–130.0130%22 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0411%21 Aug
mirage10–130.0011%20 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0213%18 Aug
vertigo13–100.0419%18 Aug
cache13–110.0122%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0126%18 Aug
nuke16–140.0015%18 Aug
nuke13–80.079%18 Aug
dust29–13-0.059%17 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0513%16 Aug
cache10–13-0.0323%9 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0410%9 Aug
inferno9–130.0518%9 Aug
cache9–13-0.046%9 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0623%8 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0116%8 Aug
inferno4–13-0.080%8 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0413%8 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0814%8 Aug
cache13–70.0618%7 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0525%7 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0413%7 Aug
dust211–13-0.0125%7 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0310%7 Aug
nuke13–50.0219%7 Aug
dust27–130.0312%6 Aug
cache16–14-0.0618%6 Aug
dust213–5-0.0129%6 Aug
cache11–13-0.0213%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0116%6 Aug
mirage13–9-0.047%4 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0312%4 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0117%4 Aug
cache9–13-0.0529%3 Aug
mirage11–130.0114%3 Aug
ancient0–13-0.0930%3 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0710%3 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0511%2 Aug
nuke23–250.0012%2 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0215%2 Aug
cache12–1-0.0226%2 Aug
mirage13–80.0316%31 Jul
nuke13–110.0823%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0711%28 Jul
mirage13–30.0319%28 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0820%27 Jul
mirage16–120.0423%26 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0213%26 Jul
cache13–70.0310%26 Jul
nuke11–13-0.059%25 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0723%25 Jul
mirage13–90.0221%23 Jul
mirage10–30.0214%22 Jul
mirage11–130.0212%22 Jul
nuke13–110.0213%22 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0411%22 Jul
ancient9–130.0118%22 Jul
boulder7–13-0.0217%21 Jul
cache5–13-0.057%21 Jul
mirage13–100.0010%20 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0213%20 Jul
nuke13–80.0415%20 Jul
nuke13–30.116%19 Jul
cache13–11-0.0118%19 Jul
nuke13–30.1716%18 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0112%18 Jul
cache16–190.0111%18 Jul
mirage13–7-0.036%18 Jul
dust213–30.0329%18 Jul
mirage13–70.0626%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0512%17 Jul
nuke13–100.0124%17 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0111%16 Jul
cache7–130.0026%15 Jul
nuke13–110.0216%15 Jul
debris9–30.218%13 Jul
shelter13–30.0612%13 Jul
boulder13–110.0417%13 Jul
fachwerk13–70.0918%13 Jul
cache8–130.0519%12 Jul
mirage9–130.0015%12 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0011%5 Jul
nuke10–13-0.007%4 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0027%4 Jul
nuke13–60.0217%3 Jul
nuke13–70.0414%3 Jul
nuke9–130.0316%3 Jul
nuke13–110.0225%3 Jul
nuke13–90.0134%3 Jul
dust213–20.0626%3 Jul
mirage9–130.0316%30 Jun
nuke13–90.0217%30 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0829%30 Jun
nuke12–16-0.0720%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →