KeKsneK

KeKsneK — CS2 Stats

NO76561198123685148[U:1:163419420]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

648Tracked matches66%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,088Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,560Top 25% of 211,494 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#48863 of 258432 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Aug 2026 (73 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,560 -1,267 22 Jun – 17 Aug · 18 days played
22,30126,341peak 26,34122 Jun17 Aug
26,341Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-06-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,781 below peak (26,341)
  • +259 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,440 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate38.5%46.8%48.2%9.7% short
Shot accuracy19.4%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.241.061.07above
Match win rate44.8%46.3%46.9%2.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKeKsneKFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,560 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning51
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–34–7Last 10059%Win rateLWWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +7.3pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility2.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.1
Utility2.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time549ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–8 · cache, 18 Jul →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · mirage, 19 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 1 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · alpine, 26 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2617–965%0.00
ancientB199–1047%0.00
dust2S1711–665%0.02
anubisA106–460%-0.00
infernoC104–640%0.01
nukeB84–450%-0.02
cacheS65–183%0.04
alpine—22–0100%0.02
overpass—21–150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

61,203Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
2,824Matches
44.8%Match win rate
38.5%Headshot %
19.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
6,556MVPs
1,088Hours (in match)
2,404Bombs planted
670Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,626
AWP9,812
P2501,550
FAMAS1,242
P901,184
Tec-91,035

Lifetime map wins

3,458inferno
2,740dust2
1,146nuke
327vertigo
189cbble
155train
104lake
67office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

97Matches
65%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
80.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2167%1.0416.2
Anubis1878%1.1815.1
Inferno743%1.0315.9
Nuke650%1.3321.3
Dust26100%1.6219.0
Ancient580%1.7019.6
Train475%1.5519.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.3%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
546msReaction time
34.1%T opening success
41.2%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
6.05HE damage / grenade
2.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3356 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1107% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis2–13-0.0728%17 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0122%17 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0026%26 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0244%26 Jul →
ancient7–130.0825%25 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0035%24 Jul →
anubis13–40.0115%24 Jul →
ancient13–40.0320%19 Jul →
mirage0–3-0.04100%19 Jul →
ancient0–13-0.030%19 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.0910%19 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0221%18 Jul →
ancient13–30.0136%18 Jul →
cache13–100.0224%18 Jul →
cache13–80.1928%18 Jul →
anubis13–80.0226%18 Jul →
inferno12–120.0231%18 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0118%17 Jul →
ancient13–80.1019%17 Jul →
mirage13–30.1028%17 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.1027%15 Jul →
dust216–140.0925%14 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0616%14 Jul →
nuke9–130.0326%14 Jul →
ancient13–90.0715%14 Jul →
dust213–70.0817%13 Jul →
dust213–90.0112%13 Jul →
cache13–90.0027%12 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.1025%12 Jul →
anubis13–70.0323%11 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0212%11 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0411%10 Jul →
anubis15–150.038%9 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0123%9 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.058%9 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0913%9 Jul →
dust29–130.0317%9 Jul →
nuke13–70.0125%8 Jul →
mirage13–60.0619%8 Jul →
inferno1–9-0.2450%8 Jul →
inferno8–80.1224%8 Jul →
inferno9–30.1747%8 Jul →
mirage13–110.0516%7 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0032%7 Jul →
dust212–120.0849%7 Jul →
cache13–40.0316%7 Jul →
mirage12–120.0122%7 Jul →
mirage13–90.0330%6 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.045%5 Jul →
dust213–100.0510%3 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0116%2 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0540%1 Jul →
mirage13–30.0613%1 Jul →
mirage16–120.0118%1 Jul →
ancient13–60.0532%1 Jul →
inferno13–2-0.0233%1 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0121%30 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0011%30 Jun →
ancient13–30.0718%30 Jun →
mirage13–90.0117%30 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0623%29 Jun →
anubis13–80.0238%28 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.029%28 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0433%28 Jun →
ancient11–130.0019%28 Jun →
inferno15–15-0.028%28 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0233%28 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0124%27 Jun →
inferno13–50.1726%27 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0115%27 Jun →
mirage6–130.0026%27 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0421%27 Jun →
nuke13–30.0514%27 Jun →
alpine13–10.0622%26 Jun →
alpine9–1-0.0229%26 Jun →
ancient15–15-0.0314%26 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.0226%26 Jun →
ancient1–7-0.030%26 Jun →
dust213–110.0116%26 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0330%26 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.0318%26 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0419%26 Jun →
mirage13–60.0122%26 Jun →
overpass10–130.0114%25 Jun →
dust213–110.0514%25 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.049%25 Jun →
anubis5–0-0.0113%25 Jun →
dust28–130.0437%25 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0020%25 Jun →
mirage16–14-0.0114%24 Jun →
mirage13–100.0115%24 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0822%24 Jun →
anubis13–90.0420%24 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0129%24 Jun →
overpass13–90.0319%23 Jun →
dust213–70.0413%22 Jun →
dust216–12-0.0124%22 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0334%22 Jun →
ancient13–40.0522%22 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0219%22 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.